Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another

With the campaign to defeat independence not due to be launched formally until next Monday, the independence campaign could have used this time to its advantage.

E-mail-sign-up Donate

 

.

It’s roughly a month since Alex Salmond launched the Yes to Independence campaign in Edinburgh, with a pledge that a million Scots would sign a pledge supporting the efforts to see Scotland an independent nation.

Scotland-Yes-to-Independence-campaignWith the campaign to defeat independence not due to be launched formally until next Monday, Salmond et al should have had free reign over the past four weeks to build that treasured possession in politics, namely momentum.

Instead, we have witnessed what could possibly be the start of a new omnishambles with the campaign lurching from one problem to another, with splits across the movement.

Firstly, just days after the campaign launch, Yes Scotland was forced to make changes to its website, after it emerged that those who were merely following the campaign’s twitter feed were being listed as full blown supporters.

Then, following Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon’s assertions that Scotland would have a guaranteed voice around the Bank of England table as part of their plans to retain sterling, the Treasury made quite clear that this was a no-no, explaining in a statement:

“Scotland using the pound through a sterlingisation mechanism… would have no say over its own monetary policy as set by the Bank of England.”

This was followed soon after by the sight and sound of Scottish Green co-convenor Patrick Harvie deciding to withdraw his party from the formal Yes campaign in protest at how dominated it had all become by the first minister to the determinant of other voices.

Yesterday came the news that, and I kid you not, on the advice of someone called Claire Howell, a psychology consultant who is apparently a long-standing adviser to the SNP, Alex Salmond has urged his MSPs to stop using the term “independence” and instead speak of an “independent Scotland”, which is apparently more appealing to the voters.

 


See also:

Salmond at Leveson: Was that it? 14 Jun 2012

“Yes Scotland” campaign in chaos as fears spread of an SNP hijack 11 Jun 2012

Ed Miliband: The future of the UK is ‘too important’ to be decided only by Scotland 7 Jun 2012


 

And today comes the bizarre news that the SNP MP Angus Robertson, Campaign Director of “Yes Scotland”, has used an interview with the German magazine Weiner Zeitung to claim that he is not in fact a nationalist.

Asked whether the Queen would remain head of state over an independent Scotland, he argued:

“Yes, I think so, in the context of the Commonwealth. I believe that our overall relationship with England would be a better one: Scots are open and friendly people, we are cosmopolitans – the German translation of my party’s name makes me angry: we aren’t nationalists.”

And the results of all this? One look at the Times this morning will make grim reading for the nationalists, with polling results compiled by Ipsos Mori for the paper showing (£) that 35% said they would support independence, down 4% since January when the very same question was asked. Those favouring the status quo stood at 55%, 5% up during the same period.

What is more, although 53% of respondents said that they were still “satisfied” with the first minister, this remains 5% down from January with the level of dissatisfaction with the job Mr Salmond is doing having risen from 36% to 40% now. Whilst the Yes campaign has sought to dismiss the findings as just one of many which have shown different things, they will be acutely aware of Scottish Labour’s assertion that the more the people of Scotland hear about independence the less they like it.

As Mark Diffley, Research Director at Ipsos MORI. has said:

“This poll reinforces the task ahead for the ‘Yes’ to independence campaign. Despite a high profile launch of their campaign, the public appears unconvinced as yet and support for independence has fallen. The difficulty faced by the campaign is reinforced by the fall in the personal approval rating for the first minister.

“He remains Scotland’s most prominent politician and well liked party leader but his rating has now fallen below what we saw in the immediate aftermath of last year’s election victory and returned to the levels we were recording in 2010.”

 


Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

29 Responses to “Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another”

  1. Pulp Ark

    Salmond’s independence campaign launches from one problem to… //t.co/B5v0MKnQ #ABritainWeAllCallHome #AlexSalmond #muslim #tcot #sioa

  2. Maia Romadhoni

    Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another, writes @EdJacobs1985: //t.co/dzdyQSHS

  3. Jason Kay

    Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another //t.co/g3dXc74V

  4. Dru

    Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another //t.co/g3dXc74V

  5. Duncan Hothersall

    SNP balloon being burst and them returning to the status of underdog could be just what their #indyref campaign needs. //t.co/txVXFD88

  6. Lord Blagger

    1. Perhaps the English should get a vote on whether Scotland should have independence.

    Oh the nightmare of England saying yes, and Scotland no. Imagine the chip on the shoulder then.

    2. Perhaps the Scots should be asked if they still want devolution.

  7. Clive Burgess

    Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another, writes @EdJacobs1985: //t.co/lBwk4U2v

  8. Gary Francis

    I wonder how they’d vote if they were given a straighforward choice:

    Full independence (does exactly what it says on the tin)

    or

    Close the Scottish Parliament and return to the pre-devolution system

    and NO complaining afterwards, whichever option you choose.

  9. Anonymous

    No complaining? Ha.

  10. home rule for england

    I’d prefer England to have a vote on whether England should have independence. It’s up to the Scottish to say whether they want to leave the UK not the English. Equally it’s up to us English to say whether we wish to leave the UK.

  11. Lawrence Mills

    Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another //t.co/g3dXc74V

  12. Pat Cox

    RT @JaeKay: Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another //t.co/vivRnWys

  13. BevR

    RT @leftfootfwd: Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another //t.co/DcL9NSRq

  14. highlandcharge

    Salmond's independence campaign launches from one problem to another, writes @EdJacobs1985: //t.co/lBwk4U2v

  15. Mr. Sensible

    Reality is catching up with Mr Salmond.

  16. Wallace1297

    Get this thru your thick English skull!, it’s a Scottish referendum, not English or any of the other’s associated with the four nations of Britain!

    It seems to me you follow this rags every word, it’s BS, the truth is Scotland does support the view of Independence because the Scots have had enough of the English parliament riding roughshod over us and labour rags like this are not going to make one bit of difference, considering the BS they spout is pure labour/Unionist propaganda

    Away and have your wee vote, indeed raise an epetition, have an independent England, you’l feel better for it but stop thinking Scots will not vote for Independence!, it is not a call of Braveheart!, it is a natural progression, and the Scots do want their Freedom back!

  17. Gerard

    You are not representative of the majority of Scots. I am Scottish and will vote ‘NO’ and I have yet to speak to even a handful of people who will vote the other way.

    Your intemperate comment seems to show the frustration you feel at seeing your regressive dream dying. Also it is just a little more of that ‘progressive’ mask slipping down to show the true face of nationalism.

    I suggest you crawl back under the negative rock you wriggled free from and leave those of us who believe in co-operation to get on with making all the nations of the UK fairer and more progressive places to live without the shadow of xenophobia hanging over us.

    Solidarity NOT Separation.

  18. Gerard

    If those were the options then hardly anyone would vote. Most people in Scotland believe Devolution is the best way forward for the country.

    I believe devolution would also benefit England but it’s not up to anyone but the English to deliver devolution (whether for England or by regions of England).

  19. Frankly

    It should be borne in mind that Angus Robertson is a German Scot, formerly employed by Austrian Radio, and was interviewed in German within a German-language cultural context. Within that context there is a particular need for a distinction to be drawn between nationalism as understood in the German-speaking world and civic nationalism as it is understood in Scotland. Mr Robertson is highly qualified to do draw that distinction.

    The Scottish National Party is entitled to make the point that it is an inclusive party which does not believe in ethnic nationalism and is essentially in fact what is known in some languages as ‘independentist’ or ‘sovereignist’. All that has happened here is that Mr Robertson has legitimately sought to clear up misunderstandings which the looser term ‘nationalist’ can
    sometimes give rise to, not least in other languages and in other cultures.

    The anglo-media, on the other hand, can be relied upon, as usual, to traduce rather than to clarify. Taking perfectly reasonable statements out of context and distorting them is becoming representative of the nature of the anglo-unionist campaign and is already disreputably representative of the media in England, of course, which are not what they once were, as we should all be acutely aware by now.

    There is nothing new in independentists expressing the view that the very loose and widely misconstrued term ‘nationalist’, which has numerous connotations and denotations, is not one which on its own can be entirely relied upon in all circumstances to convey adequately the essential nature of their political convictions. As Mr Robertson makes clear, Scottish independentists, unlike many British nationalists, are cosmopolitan rather than insular and pro-European rather than anti-European.

    Incidentally, Wiener Zeitung (not “Weiner Zeitung”), is not, as its name makes clear, a “German magazine” but is an Austrian newspaper published in Vienna. The ‘Anschluss’ didn’t take! Not unlike the anglo-union in a way.

    For a more balanced and better-informed account of the pro-independence side of things:

    //rueclementmarot.blogspot.co.uk/

    To read the Walter Hämmerle article entitled We Are No Nationalists in the Wiener Zeitung of June 4th:

    //tinyurl.com/c2qnl3n

  20. Frankly

    What do you know about reality?

  21. Frankly

    Your own comment is somewhat intemperate, I venture to suggest.

  22. Alistair Darling: An independent Scotland will weaken its strength in Brussels | Left Foot Forward

    […] See also: • Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another 19 Jun […]

  23. Gerard

    I know 😀

    I wasn’t criticising that aspect of his comment, merely suggesting the cause of it’s tone.

    I guess I don’t like people calling others stupid just because of hwere they come from. Call me stupid and I’ll take it but don’t criticise me as a Scottish idiot. Why has the nationality of the person Wallace1297 disagrees with got anything to do with it?

    Is it because the nationalist face behind the slipping progressive mask?

  24. Wallace1297

    No gerard, my comment was aimed at lord blagger!.
    He continually spouts about how it would be funny if England had a vote on Scots independence and it was England that voted yes and the Scots no, how funny that would be?
    He also spouts on about how the Scots have big chips on their shoulders, when he has no clue as to what has been done to Scotlands Industrial base over the last half century to help out English based industry!

    That also appears to be your problem as well, unless that is, your in your early twenty’s, which suggests then that you have no clue as to what your on about!!

    Stronger together, fairer UK?, co-operation?, would that be the same fairness and co-operation that has seen the industrial base in Scotland hamstrung by Wastemidden?

    Nationalism?, there is nothing wrong in having pride in your country of birth, go ask the Germans, the French, English, etc, etc, if either of those nations feel any pride towards their country, then ask them the question do you feel like a nationalist, bet the answers yes but pose the question in Scotland and if you are you are xenophobic?, away pap peas at the moon nugget!

    Co-operation is it, mmm, you mean the type of co-operation that is currently screwing the planet up for profit while the indigenous people are cast off as second class citizens?

    Go ask the polish how solidarity worked out for them!

    You are not representative of many views in Scotland, and if you think your views are, you better think again!

    I suggest you crawl back under the rock you so obviously have come out from, have a wee think to yourself, look around that rock you came from and think to yourself, could this be better if we were not being drained by the leech that is wastemidden!!

  25. Wallace1297

    I have no problems with some ones nationality, i do however call a spade a spade!. Lord Blagger professes to be English, therefore using the phrase “thick English skull”, is not me having a go at his nationality but rather his rationality!

    Maybe your one of those PC Fascists eh?, oh don’t use language that is not in the PC Brigade hand book!, it’s offensive to my delicate little mind!!

    In any case, i always find that if the question or answer does not pertain to you leave it alone, it’s not your business!!

  26. Anonymous

    If social democracy is going to succeed in countering the neo-barbarism of neo-liberalism, then the Left in EWNI are going to have to so a bit more sophisticated thinking than blindly opposing the SNP and Scotland’s return to self government in order to prop up Labour in Scotland and hope to win at the next GE.

    Sometimes the ‘obvious’ thing to do is the wrong method to achieve goals. In this case the ‘obvious’ thing to do is to assume that the SNP is ‘the enemy’ because it is opposed by Labour in Scotland.

    This also assumes that opposing a national movement for self determination is a) morally justifiable, b) not a hopeless lost cause c) somehow supportive of Left ideals.

    There are such things as global historical trends, since WWII all the sizeable bits of the British Empire have become fully self governing. The UN has increased by over 120 newly self governing countries. Scotland is simply another.

    With the growth of international shared organisations, UN, EU etc, has come a matching trend for people wanting a direct say in such forums.

    The world is a much better educated place than 50 years ago. With education comes the demand for more local say and democracy. This led to the Scottish Parliament and is now leading to demand for more powers and control by the Parliament.

    International agreements and Unions have their purpose, meet needs for a given time and then fall into disuse or get scrapped. The defence, trade and other reasons for the Union (such as preserving the Protestant religion) are now simply badly outdated. Why get so wired up in defence of an outdated arrangement.

    To return to the theme of this post, the Left needs to think more long term, and more strategically. Despite the coalition unpopularity, Tory incompetence, etc, Left thinking is on the back foot at present in EWNI. In order to get in on the front foot, needs there is a massive need for strategic repositioning. Signing up to back the arch-Unionist Tories is definitely NOT going to positively reposition the Left.

    So here is an alternative scenario. Consider that the Left stay true to its support for Human Rights, including the Right to Self Determination. enshrined in the UN. Box canny and back off the trap of allying publicly and disastrously with the Tories and LibDems in support of a Union that is going to end anyway, sooner or later. Instead, start examining the already progressive social democratic legislation and administrative steps taken by the SNP. In short, take a leaf out of the Tories book. They are expert at cherry picking the best of other parties policies and adopting them. (If you are not aware how Westminster has been copycatting SNP policies then you need to catch up)

    What I advocate, is that the Left takes a ‘long shortcut’. Back off the trap of being ultra-Unionists. There are no prizes or winners in that route. Instead, watch, study, adapt and adopt the best of the pioneering methods being used in Scotland. Translate and interpret those social democratic policies for English needs and wants. In three years time, Scotland will dissolve the Union. Given the current head in sand posture of most politicians, the establishment will be in disarray. This presents the opportunity for success for the Left. If they have spent the intervening time and energy demonising and dismissing the best social democratic movement in Britain, the Left will be as unprepared as the others. If the Left has disengaged, observed, deliberated and prepared, then the Left can present clear, coherent, cogent arguments as to how the constitution and government of EWNI must be reorganised. The ‘long shortcut’ is the quick route to reform. Let Scotland reform itself its way. Get prepared to reform EWNI when the once in generations opportunity opens up.

  27. The Scottish press's verdict of the launch of the “Better Together” campaign | Left Foot Forward

    […] Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another 19 Jun […]

  28. Do the SNP see England as a foreign country already? | Left Foot Forward

    […] Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another 19 Jun […]

  29. As Yes to Independence campaign splits (again), Cameron considers taking control of Scottish referendum | Left Foot Forward

    […] Salmond’s independence campaign lurches from one problem to another 19 June […]

Leave a Reply