Cormac Hollingsworth explains how the warning signs for Barclays’s tax-dodging were there back in 2008.
As Lord Wood said today:
“The occupy protest against corporate greed in London was disbanded on the day Barclays were revealed to have used a loophole to avoid paying £500 million tax.”
Cormac Hollingsworth explains the background behind the Barclays deal…
Bob Diamond’s Barclays Bank has been caught by the UK tax man trying to help two clients avoid tax on half a billion pounds, it was revealed by the FT yesterday (£).
The tax authorities described the schemes as “highly abusive” and HMRC are changing the law to close the loopholes exposed.
Bob Diamond, the man who a year ago told the Treasury Select Committee that “the time for banker remorse is over,” is clearly taking this beyond the boundaries of acceptability.
As Richard Murphy has blogged last night, Barclays had signed a code of conduct on taxation that these transactions explicitly looked to dodge.
But the warnings were there, back in the financial crisis.
Barclays shareholders were up in arms at the deal that Bob Diamond cut with the Qatari and Abu Dhabi states that bailed out Barclays bank to the order of £7 billion. The deal paid 14 per cent, while a comparable deal from the UK government was a 12 per cent coupon (for example, that’s what RBS had to pay).
There had to be a reason why Barclays board preferred to pay the higher coupon to avoid the UK becoming its shareholder, and that reason is now clear. With the UK government as their shareholder, their highly abusive tax deals would have been stopped.
• ECB bailing out British banks exposes coalition’s finance failure – Cormac Hollingsworth, February 27th 2012
• Transparency, accountability, responsibility: Miliband’s “one nation banking” principles – Shamik Das, February 3rd 2012
• A word for 2012: Liquidation – Cormac Hollingsworth, January 4th 2012
• Implementing Vickers won’t stop the next crisis – Josh Ryan Collins, December 20th 2011
• The challenges for Labour in developing a credible banking regulation policy – Matthew Pitt, September 2nd 2011
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.