Jenny Jones AM looks at why so many civilian jobs in the Met have been replaced by trained police officers working at desks.
By Jenny Jones AM, leader of the Green Party on the London Assembly
I was surprised to see the Met Police forecast last year to spend around £50 million to make around 900 civilian staff redundant.
I was particularly surprised because the newly formed Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime has a forecast number for March 2012 for civilian staff which they are currently over 1,500 behind.
That’s 1,500 jobs vacant that need to be filled as we head towards the Olympics.
The issue of civilian staff may not be as sexy as total police numbers but when budgets are being cut it is vital resources are being used efficiently.
It makes no financial sense to spend £50 million making hundreds of staff redundant and then start recruiting over a thousand more. This whole expensive mess is down to the Mayor, who decided the only way he can make the government cuts and keep police numbers high is by sacking civilian staff.
The result is that we have more police sitting behind desks rather than out on patrols.
We know that part of the money, around £9 million, went towards the cost of replacing traffic wardens with PCSO and police sergeants, a bad financial change as police officers cost more than civilian staff.
The Met already has one of the lowest proportions of civilian staff in its workforce compared to other police services and generally the use of a member of civilian staff is cheaper than a police officer by around £20k a year. This move allows officer numbers to stay high, but is not providing Londoners with good value for money.
I am worried that the mayor’s fixation with keeping up officer numbers means the Met will employ police officers behind desks in roles that can be done more cheaply and more effectively by police staff.
I have been given examples of backfilling already taking place:
• I am advised that in the Palace of Westminster the health and safety trainer is now a police officer rather than staff member and the staff deployment manager is now a police sergeant rather than police staff duty manager;
• I’m told that in Stoke Newington the property manager vacancy was filled by a police sergeant;
• That at the criminal justice units arrest warrants and other admin work is being undertaken by police officers;
• And that inspectors and sergeants are supervising case clerks and typists.
This is hardly the frontline policing we have been promised.
One explanation for this could be that some of the officers are on restricted duties and that is why they are doing these civilian roles.
However, if they are on restricted duties then it means they are unable to respond to public order events like the summer disturbances – the exact reason we are given for why officer numbers must remain so high even when the Met is faced with huge budget cuts. I wouldn’t want officers on restricted duties doing nothing, but it should be short term and part of the natural turnover of staff.
The Assembly’s budget committee report into front line policing found that the civilianisation of support functions is desirable because officers are generally more expensive to employ. Also for specialist support roles it’s often more useful to employ civilians with specific professional skills than officers with general skills.
There is no point in having over 32,000 police officers if they are sat behind desks covering vital back office jobs. I think the mayor should move past his obsession with police numbers and instead look at how best to use the resources available with the money at hand.
• Resources, powers and accountability – the three big issues facing the police in 2012 – Kevin Meagher, January 5th 2012
• The creeping militarisation of our police must be resisted – Kevin Meagher, December 9th 2011
• Anger with police sparked the riots – Ben Mitchell, December 4th 2011
• Cameron “ignorant or disingenuous” on frontline police cuts – Will Straw, August 11th 2011
• The map that shows the frontline of the police cuts – Dominic Browne, April 11th 2011
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.