Business secretary Vince Cable gave an impressive speech on curbing excessive pay and reducing inequality at the Liberal Democrat party conference today.
Larissa Hansford is a campaign assistant at One Society
Vince Cable’s speech at today’s Liberal Democrat conference could be criticised for making points of principle but lacking firm commitments. Unfortunately, these points of principle still need to be made and it is a positive thing that politicians are taking the issue of excessive pay and wage inequality seriously, despite opposition from influential organisations.
Miles Templeton, head of the Institute of Directors, is a case in point. His comment on the speech was that it’s “daft” to be talking about curbing executive pay, hoping that it’s just “conference rhetoric” because it isn’t something that would help the UK economy.
It is a sad irony that many of those who argue reducing CEO pay would threaten the economy also insist that raising low pay would do the same.
In reality, there is increasing recognition that that reducing inequalities of income and rebuilding the economy go hand in hand, especially if one recognises that people other than CEOs create wealth, and that they need to be properly rewarded too.
There is widespread concern that growing pay inequality is linked to increased economic volatility, with low income households forced to increase debt levels, high pay and bonuses creating a climate of short-termist risk-taking, and stagnation of pay at a lower level reducing consumption and risking stalling economic recovery in the UK.
So it is good Cable reiterated that whilst “there is absolutely nothing wrong with generous rewards for those who build up successful businesses and create wealth and jobs”, there is a problem with:
“…executive pay which, in many cases, has lost any connection with the value of shares, let alone average employee pay.”
On a less abstract level, there are also positive signs. Vince Cable stated his intention to continue consultations on strengthening the link between pay and performance, and implied an intention to make shareholder votes on remuneration committees binding. He also talked about making details of pay within private companies more transparent, both to shareholders and the public.
We will have to wait for the details. It is disappointing so little was said about Cable’s previously stated suggestion that employees could sit on remuneration committees, and that the focus of the speech was on the weak link of high pay to company performance, rather than the negative effects of high ratios on the wider economy, and on individual companies.
Unrestrained greed, and the inequalities it creates, are not only unacceptable, but are an inefficient way of running our society and economy.
We hope those ideas will emerge from the consultations, and that Cable’s willingness to take on assertions about the principle of fair pay will also lead him to take on those who assert the solutions – such as pay ratio reporting and broadening the membership of remuneration committees – are also dangerous or unnecessary.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
11 Responses to “Cable gets it on pay and inequality – unlike the greedy IoD”
Mr. Sensible
Wonder what certain Tories will make of it…
Nice to see the Lib Dems finding their voices since the local elections…
Ash
They do seem to ‘get it’ on inequality when it comes to the gap between the rich and the rest of us, which is good. But arguably the more important gap is the gap between the poor and the rest of us – and on that front, they could not be getting it more wrong. Their policies on tax and benefits – raise the 20p threshold, raise VAT, cut benefits – seem to have been fine-tuned to benefit mainly people in the top half of the income distribution, while harming those at the very bottom (people so poor as to be reliant on benefits, and paying little or no income tax).
The Wealth Squad
Cable gets it on pay and inequality – unlike the greedy IoD: In reality, there is increasing recognition that th… http://t.co/C0DhGvEv
Gareth Jones
http://t.co/Kw6k1bCq #Cable gets it on pay and inequality #ldconf
Richard
Cable is delusional if he thinks shareholders votes’ on top pay will count for anything. On average only 15% of shareholders vote against the top salaries, with the rest of the votes being held by the institutional investors and pension fund managers who are card-carrying members of the same kleptocracy.