We need to stand up for human rights in the Indian sub-continent

Barry Gardiner MP, chair of Labour Friends of India, writes for Left Foot Forward ahead of tomorrow’s parliamentary debate on human rights in the Indian sub-continent.

Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) is the chair of Labour Friends of India

Tomorrow I will be speaking alongside other members of Labour Friends of India in a debate in Parliament on “human rights in the Indian sub-continent”. We want to take the opportunity of this debate to remind the world of how India, the world’s most populous democracy, continues to be a beacon of tolerance, peace and democracy in the face of some of the most serious security threats faced by any country in the world.

The Indian sub-continent is one of the most dangerous and unstable regions in the world. The 2011 Failed State Index from the respected ‘Foreign Policy’ magazine lists six of India’s neighbours as being amongst ’the most failed states in the world’.

Pakistan, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Bhutan all featured on the list of 60 countries.

To India’s west lies Pakistan with whom conflict has repeatedly erupted over the disputed region of Kashmir, while regional tensions in Myanmar and the horrendous civil war in Sri Lanka mean India is a unique democracy without civil repression in an area of dictatorship and state atrocities.

India suffers regular terrorist attacks on its major cities, at a frequency which should terrify the west. This year alone has seen major bombs in Mumbai, killing 26 people, and more recently in New Delhi, which killed 13 people, not to mention the smaller but more regular bombings, kidnappings and murders which kill dozens each year.

These attacks, which are a daily threat to Indians trying to go about their lives, are carried out by Islamist extremists, Kashmiri separatists and Marxist Nexalites amongst others.

The Indian Centre for Conflict Management indentifies 168 terrorist, insurgent and extremist groups currently active in India; it states:

“310 of the country’s 636 Districts are currently afflicted by varying intensities of chronic activity, including subversion, by insurgent and terrorist groupings.”

What is most staggering when you realise the full extent of the threat of terror in India is that she continues to be an intensely democratic and peaceful nation. Many other countries have been quick to limit freedoms and democracy in the face of far less demonstrable threats.

The most prominent news from India in recent months has been the success of Anna Hazare and his campaign against corruption. Mr Hazare undertook a hunger strike to protest against the weaknesses of the government’s Lokpal Bill.

The Lokpal Bill, a long-standing aim of successive Indian governments, aimed to create an Ombudsman with the power to investigate incidences of alleged corruption by senior government officials and cabinet members. Following Mr Hazare’s hunger strike, as well as protests in support of him, the government chose to expand the remit of the Lokpal Bill.

Occasions such as these illustrate the vibrancy of Indian democracy and civil society. Given the Indian people’s long history of activism, these successes do not come as a surprise.

The Indian Constitution, drawn up following a long struggle for independence, includes a bill of rights which provides for the right to equality; the right to freedom of speech and assembly; the right to freedom of conscience; and the right to education.

India takes the fulfilment of these constitutional rights incredibly seriously. In 1993, a National Human Rights Commission was established to investigate suspected violations of human rights in the country. In recent decisions the Indian Supreme Court passed orders for the right to food for all to be fulfilled, and in 2006 ordered police reform in light of response to human rights concerns.

Group rights in India are also incredibly strong. A bill providing quotas for women in Parliament has been passed, whilst in April of last year, new guidelines for maternal death investigations were put in place and a separate mechanism to track pregnancies and their outcomes introduced.

The spirit of Mahatma Ghandi, on which Indian democracy was founded and in which it still operates today, has proved to be far stronger than the threats it has faced. All friends of India hope, and indeed are confident, this will continue into the future. It is an incredible achievement, of which all Indians should be proud.

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.

8 Responses to “We need to stand up for human rights in the Indian sub-continent”

  1. Political Planet

    We need to stand up for human rights in the Indian sub-continent: Barry Gardiner MP, chair of Labour Friends of … http://t.co/FIaFPVD

  2. Brit Lefit

    Labour nonsense about 'democracy' in a land of 900 poor
    RT @leftfootfwd:human rights in the #India http://t.co/lGxR8bz writes @BarryGardiner

  3. Barry Gardiner MP

    RT @leftfootfwd: We need to stand up for human rights in the Indian sub-continent http://t.co/ha3oGUP

  4. Martin Gerdemann

    We need to stand up for human rights in the Indian sub-continent: http://t.co/nEB2ono writes @BarryGardiner

  5. Global Witness Mag

    We need to stand up for human rights in the Indian sub-continent: http://t.co/nEB2ono writes @BarryGardiner

  6. robert the crip

    India the land of poverty, it still has caste discrimination even though it was supposed to be removed in 1950. You have Police who walk around with sticks to beat you with, prostitution at age 12, you have children running the streets homeless working as slaves, you have the UK giving millions for so called poverty but it’s more then likely for buying arms.

    India is still in a total mess but hell it’s going into space.

  7. Mohan

    @Robert the crip
    India does not need your millions and did not ask for it. You can probably use it for fixing the damages caused by the riots in england!

  8. Ram Mashru

    I think it’s a waste of parliamentary time that this debate would take place. India repeatedly infringes fundamental rights in and outside the security context. Forgive me for being cynical but such debates clearly evidence the levels to which this government is prepared to pander to the ego of a government, that shows contempt for its own people, in order to maintain trade relations.

    I think a powerful argument along these lines can be found here: http://discussn.wordpress.com/2011/09/22/indias-democracy-beginning-to-ask-the-right-questions/

Leave a Reply