Changes to the student visa system will cost the economy billions during a period of sluggish growth, and will affect all regions of the country.
Awale Olad is a public affairs officer at the Migrants’ Rights Network
Today’s figures of 0.2 per cent GDP growth show the UK’s climb out of recession to be uncertain and sluggish. It seems the Home Office could not have timed worse the release of a damning new report from the home affairs committee on the consequences of the changes to student visas. It’s official: these changes are set to cost the economy £3.4 billion; a disconcerting revelation for the embattled George Osborne who also has to monitor the euro-crisis and the fiscal turmoil in Greece.
The over-arching message from today’s report is that the government needs to seriously consider the growing challenges of the UK’s economy and the impact of restricting foreign students on income generated by research and innovation in higher education – issues which it thinks have not yet been properly considered.
The UK’s economy is bolstered by the funding stream of overseas students, an industry “worth up to £40 billion” and provides a direct contribution of “up to £12.5 billion” annually to revenue. There is no denying the government faces some considerable challenges in reforming the current immigration system and trying to balance an economy in freefall.
But major restrictions on foreign student visas announced earlier this year have created real panic across the education sector about loss of income. Today’s report suggests economic contributions by foreign students will be cut drastically, producing widespread reductions in net income across the Treasury’s coffers.
These concerns are not new, but has the government taken them seriously yet? Back in March at a meeting of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Migration (APPGM), a group of MPs and experts warned that reforms of such magnitude will have a negative impact on higher education institutions and on wider economic growth.
Following the meeting, APPGM chair Jack Dromey MP, asked the home secretary whether the economic impacts of restricting international students would be considered – and received the response that the government had no intention of doing so.
It seems the dismissal of these concerns has now come back to haunt the government. In particular, the regional economic impacts of restrictions on international students look to be significant and could endanger government efforts to rebalance regional economies.
Unlike other core British industries such as manufacturing, IT and financial services – which tend to concentrate economic growth within particular regions – income from international students contributes to all the regions and devolved countries of the UK.
Many further and higher education institutions provide wider employment opportunities, generate income for local industries and the private housing sector, and offer a wider boost to local economic dynamism within their region. Education providers in the UK argue they are able to consolidate their role as hubs of innovation and economic regeneration by drawing upon international talent and revenue.
As such, regional economies are likely to be hit the hardest by restrictions on international students which are viewed as short-sighted and counter-productive. The Scottish home affairs committee sees these changes as potentially deterring “genuine, high-calibre” students from applying to study in Scotland.
The failure to ask the government’s own immigration gurus, the Migration Advisory Committee, to assess what damage will be dealt to the economy as a result of curbing overseas students displays a disregard of what immigration experts have to say on the issue.
If it had done so, these issues and potential solutions could have been provided earlier in a cost-effective way, giving the government political ownership on the matter and better planning for impacts on national and regional economic growth.
Sadly, however, this looks to have been a missed opportunity.
46 Responses to “How Tory immigration populism is costing us £3.4 billion”
Sophie Kinsella
Hello Admin,
I am Neil Williams. I am a full time blogger and content writer. I write financial articles for sites on finance niche. Today, while searching for a suitable platform, I just come across your site (No .. . .. That does not apply to financial companies of any kind until you fully understand the requirements for approval. Once two or more banks have reduced their business loan application will be very difficult to get approval from other banks. ). It’s a good site with useful and informative articles.
I wish to contribute one guest post to your wonderful site. I wonder if you can allow me to do so. My article will be on a financial topic such as on personal finance, tax money, investment, banking, economy, debt, mortgage, retirement or so (you too can suggest me a topic). Rest assured my article will be 100% original, exclusive and will be in accordance with your site’s core content.
In return, if you wish, you too can make guest posts in my blogs or sites or take suitable backlinks from the same.
To sum up, you will get a fresh relevant article to your site and a backlink to your site, if you wish so. My article will contain only one related link of my site. Rest assured of this.
Please reach me at my mail ids: sophie.kinsella61 [at] gmail [dot] com.
I will look forward to your positive reply shortly.
Thanking you,
Regards,
Sophie Kinsella
Look Left – Just when you thought hackgate couldn’t get any worse... | Left Foot Forward
[…] Awale Olad of the Migrants’ Rights Network explained on Left Foot Forward on Tuesday: “Major restrictions on foreign student visas announced earlier […]
Suzie
“it means that prices, including rents will have to come down to the price that the poorly paid britain can afford”
Is that a joke? Or have you completely missed the news that university tuition fees for British students will now be up to £9,000? The universities have to make up somehow for the loss of revenue caused by reduced numbers of high-fee paying international students, amongst other cuts, and who is paying for it? The British students.
Also, on a side note to your ridiculously prejudiced comment about international students ‘not understanding anything’; many of my ESL friends speak and understand English at a much higher level than plenty of native speakers. Stop being so narrow-minded and pigeon-holing all ‘foreigners’ as some sort of plague upon British society.
Leon Wolfson
Suzie – Yup. I’ve just had my contact hours at one university cut by 20% (which WILL mean more “self-study” weeks, on top of the existing ones which never existed when *I* went to University), and they’re getting the permanent staff to spend 70% rather than 60% of their time teaching (as opposed to research and business-related activity).
It’s slashing the future, but they genuinely have no choice with the budget cuts.
Andrew Burgess
How the Conservatives' immigration populism is costing us £3.4 billion http://t.co/PHQTpgA (via @leftfootfwd)