Tory MPs vote to discourage work and use taxes as social engineering

With hopes to enable married couples to transfer thier personal tax allowance to the higher earner, Tories have abonded key principles for the sake of moralising

When you think of Conservative party core policies, you think of encouraging growth, balanced budgets, maintaining Britain’s international competitiveness and increasing aspirations. One of the most obvious way to do that is to increase employment – which would lead to a larger economic output, higher tax receipts that can reduce the deficit, and individuals building careers that, in the long-term, can help achieve their hopes for themselves and their families.

It turns out that at least ten Conservative MPs don’t view those as front-rank priorities. According to today’s Daily Mail:

“Conservative backbenchers yesterday tried to push David Cameron into giving tax breaks to married couples. At least ten MPs backed a Commons amendment which would allow husbands and wives to share tax allowances.”

So how would this work? Currently the personal tax allowance – that amount of money an individual can earn without paying income tax is £6,475. So under the proposals, if a husband earned £20,000 but his wife was unemployed, she could ‘transfer’ that £6,475 to him, leaving him with an effective personal tax allowance to £12,950. Taken in conjuction with the Lib Dems policy of raising the threshold to £10,000, – enthusiastically embraced by the Tory right – this would essentially leave such a husband’s salary completely untouched by income tax.

The effect would be that, if the wife consequently decided to go to work, every penny of the lower earner’s salary would be effectively taxed, as the pooled personal allowance has already been ‘used up’, thereby reducing work incentives.  When the implications of national insurance, tax credits and childcare costs are taken into account, the household may even suffer a loss of income. When the idea bubbled up in 2009, the Institute for Fiscal Studies calculated the implication like this:

“IFS research models the case of a married couple with two children. In the first instance, where one partner earns £20,000 and the other does not perform any paid work, the IFS puts family income at £20,300, including tax credits. Under existing rules, if the partner who does not work then gets a job paying £10,000 a year, family income rises to just £25,425 because 46% of the partner’s income is lost in extra tax and reduced tax credits.

“The IFS has modelled what would happen in both cases if the Tories brought back the transferable personal allowance.

“If only the partner earning £20,000 worked, the combined salary would rise to £21,595. If the partner took a job earning £10,000, the combined income would remain the same, putting the marginal tax rate for the second earner at 62%.”

Of course there is also the equally important feminist point that with most two-earner households having the man as the main breadwinner, the tax change would discourage women from having an independent income – but we already know what the Tories’ opinion of the feminist movement is. And  the policy blatantly discriminates against cohabiting couples. Again, par for the course for the Conservatives.

What’s really shocking is how many Tory MPs are willing to throw out all that high-flown rhetoric about economic growth, deficit reduction, work ethic and international competitiveness, when the chance for a bit of moralising social engineering comes their  way.

17 Responses to “Tory MPs vote to discourage work and use taxes as social engineering”

  1. 13eastie

    “…at least ten Conservative MPs…”? “…really shocking…”?

    Left Foot Forward would appear to be in agreement with more than 97% of MP’s on the government benches on this, then?

  2. media man

    http://bit.ly/cH445Y Tory MPs vote to discourage work and use taxes as social engineering: What's really shockin… http://bit.ly/k2S106

  3. Leon Wolfson

    It’s never too early to stomp on Tory bad ideas, before they have a chance to destroy even more jobs.

    Oh, and that’s ignoring the way this kind of thing encourages marriages-of-convenience, which are fully legal if both are UK citizens…

  4. George McLean

    @ 1. 13eastie

    There you go again! Ten little Tories, each one with a job to do: asking us to put a foot on their lovely slippery slope.

  5. 13eastie

    @2 Leon,

    You do realise that, without exception, every Labour government we have ever had has presided over an increase in unemployment? Coincidence?

    And that unemployment is falling?

    @3 George,

    Tin-foil hat not recommended during heat-wave.

Comments are closed.