Willie Walsh has probably killed off the third runway at Heathrow with the admission by the British Airways (BA) chief executive that it will "never be built".
By John Stewart of AirportWatch
Willie Walsh has probably killed off the third runway at Heathrow. The admission by the British Airways (BA) chief executive, at The Times CEO Summit yesterday, that “a third runway will never be built at Heathrow” is hugely significant.
For years British Airways has been the most powerful advocate for a third runway. The airline argued it was essential to their business model which was based on large numbers of passengers interchanging at Heathrow from long-haul intercontinental flights to short-haul hops to European destinations.
Yesterday Walsh admitted that it was planning to use Madrid Airport for much more of this ‘hub’ function. BA is well-placed to do this as it recently formed an alliance with Iberian Airlines. It is this admission which has effectively killed off the third runway at Heathrow. The biggest user of the airport is now basing its business plans and projections, on life without a new runway.
There will continue to be business voices calling for a third runway but, without the backing of BA, they will diminish in significance.
Willie Walsh hinted yesterday that the UK economy would be the loser if the number of passengers interchanging at Heathrow could no longer grow. There is no hard evidence to back this up. The seminal CE Delft report – The economics of Heathrow expansion, published in 2008, (pdf) – found that, because of London’s attractiveness to international firms as a place to do business, the number of flights using Heathrow would continue to be high enough to provide excellent international connectivity without a new runway.
Furthermore, London is already the best-connected city in the world. In 2009, the last year for which full figures are available, over 130 million passengers used London’s five airports – more than any other world city. Paris was London’s closest European competitor with just under 86 million passengers using its airports.
There is no doubt the government, under pressure from some Conservatives to reconsider its decision to rule out new runways in the South East, will welcome Willie Walsh’s statement. The intriguing question is how Labour will react.
As part of its wide-ranging policy review it is, under Shadow Transport secretary Maria Eagle, asking all the right questions about aviation. My own view is that, however many fresh aviation policies Labour develops, unless it drops its support for a third runway at Heathrow, the public perception will be that nothing has changed. Willie Walsh’s statement should make it easier for Labour to say ‘no’ to a third runway.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
7 Responses to “How will Labour react to news BA have given up on third runway?”
mr. Sensible
Leon I think you’re simply quite wrong.
With HS2, it will enable us to get from 1 end of the country to another. It could, for example, compete with domestic flights between London and Manchester in terms of journey times.
And with Eurostar, at the moment you can probably get from London to Paris in about the same amount of time as going by air, if not possibly quicker if you take out the time for check in ETC.
And as for the environment, I personally think nuclear does have a role, bu we simply need to get a grip on this, and as I say getting rid of that runway was one of the few sensible decisions this government made.
Leon Wolfson
Mr. Sensible;
Which economic study are you relying on for your thinking on HS2?
Also, again, Eurostar is fine, but it’s only between limited points. The number of destinations services by air is going up, especially in Western Europe, and that’s where the flexibility is needed.
“Getting a grip” on throwing away our advantages? Er…