Peter Hain, speaking on Saturday, called for a transformation of the party and an increase in grassroots democracy, reports Dominic Browne.
Peter Hain spoke at the Progressive Fightback Conference this weekend, saying he chose the name “Refounding Labour” for his review of the party’s structures and processes because “that is the scale of the challenge we face”.
Hain, who chairs the national policy forum for the project, saw the review’s website launch this week, and has asked for party members to set out what they love and what they would change about the party.
The main theme of the review appears to be creating more democracy and community engagement within the party which has, in the past, been labelled as being too centralist.
He said:
“We need to transform our party… Affiliated trade unions have less reach into the community than they used to. Are there other groups that can help us reach out to the community? There are lots of Labour supporters in mumsnet, greenpeace, non-affiliated trade unions.
“On policy we have to change the whole way we create policy – how do we breathe life in the national policy forum, – creating a living and breathing process of engaging people – if we had listened more in government we would have done better on things like social housing.”
The shadow welsh secretary also commented that in today’s society joining a political party is not the norm but asked for ideas on developing links with party supporters and those sympathetic to the Labour Party’s ideas:
“We have plenty of supporters, how can we engage these supporters, how can we give them a voice?”
Talking of the importance of community politics he said:
“By operating in an entirely different way, (we can create) a better local party that is necessary to people for a change.”
Hain called it an election winning strategy citing constituencies like Edgbaston, Oxford East and Tooting – that went against the national swing in the last election. He put this down to committed and excellent local activists and organisers, who made the party relevant to voters on a local level.
In response, Sunny Hundal, editor of Liberal Conspiracy, speaking from the floor of the conference, called the Labour party structure “incomprehensible” and in need of drastic reform in order to make it more relevant.
Likewise Will Straw, writing on Labour Uncut about the review and what he would change in the party, said:
“The fixed agendas and arcane rules may provide comfort to party stalwarts, but too often our meetings resemble a Monty Python sketch.”
Mark Ferguson, editor of Labour List, seemed to strike a chord with many at the conference when he complained, from the floor, about the centralisation of information and party control, giving one example:
“Why can’t we be told who is on the long list (of candidates to stand for parliament in a constituency). Things like that which aren’t necessary for a party in the 20th century.”
Also Shamik Das, our acting editor, called for a change to the the party’s approach to door knocking, asking whether the activists’ script and pre-determined questions were not too prescriptive and missed the chance to find out more about the real issues on the doorstep.
Alongside these more general issues of party renewal came the subject of democratic primaries to elect those who will stand for parliamentary seats. Opinions appeared to be divided over the issue, with some stating it would “tear the party apart” and others stating that the party should act now on primaries before they were left behind by the Tories on this issue of grass-roots democracy.
Mr Hain stated it was an important issue for debate and commented that he believed Mr Cameron was interested in primaries but may have lost some of his enthusiasm since the election of Dr Sarah Wollaston MP, who has been “a thorn in the government’s side over the NHS, and we all wish her luck”.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
12 Responses to “Peter Hain: “We must transform the party””
Anon E Mouse
And Peter Hain now agrees with me about Labour. Another one.
I’m looking forwards to my apologies from the various delusional Labour supporters who have been telling me how wrong I’ve been on this blog for the last year.
I’m waiting…
Ed's Talking Balls
Anon E Mouse,
You don’t want to listen to Mr. Permatan on anything much.
In fairness, however, Hain’s right that Labour needs to transform. The problem is that neither he nor anyone else in his party seems to understand (at least not from what I’ve read and heard) the type and extent of change required.
This ‘progressive’ self-indulgence lately has done his party’s chances no good in the long-term, that’s for sure.
Harry Barnes
For a response from level-headed labour lefties see – http://dronfieldblather.blogspot.com/
Dave Citizen
If Labour isn’t careful it will dissapear up its own orifice. Labour in power is only what this country needs if Labour has a clear and coherent alternative to the conservative model.
Before mapping out the best way to gain power I suggest they answer some more basic questions such as:
What sort of levels of inequality does Labour think are healthy in the society Labour wants to work towards – are we talking Finland/Japan; Germany/Netherlands or Singapore/USA where we are now?
How will labour rebalance our economic incentives and land & property taxes to achieve a healthier more efficient society?
If Labour can’t answer these sort of basic questions on the balance to strike on wealth and rewards then who will?
amy dodd
"We must transform our Party" @leftfootfwd reports on Peter Hain's comments at Saturday's Fabian conference: http://bit.ly/mlSAQO