The government’s green-wash on sustainable development

Shadow environment secretary Mary Creagh outlines the government's failures in their bid to become the "greenest government ever" - especially on sustainable development.

Mary Creagh MP is the shadow environment secretary

The Sustainable Development Commission held its final summit on Tuesday March 1st, just days before its abolition by the government. The previous day ministers put their new sustainable development strategy online – no press launch, no fanfare. Their strategy rings with ideological hollowness and demonstrates the lack of vision for sustainability in government. They have a plan for cuts but no plan for the environment.

Jonathan Porritt wrote that the new strategy was:

“…without a doubt the most disgraceful government document relating to sustainable development that I have ever seen.”

While Peter Kendall, president of the National Farmers’ Union, criticised it for ignoring the challenges of food security completely.

The Sustainable Development Commission was set up by Labour in 2000 to link environmental progress to wider social and economic goals. Its independence was a fundamental part of its ability to test and challenge government at all levels, and Labour ministers strengthened its watchdog role in 2005.

The Tories’ ideologically driven belief in the small state is having a profound impact on environmental policy. In January the cross-party Environmental Audit Committee criticised the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs for failing in its duty to promote sustainable development across government. Now DEFRA wants the Environmental Audit Committee to scrutinise its sustainable development strategy without any extra resources.

The Tories’ approach to the Sustainable Development Commission is similar to their stance on forests: they don’t think government should be involved at all. The problem for the Tories is that the public largely disagree. More than half a million people signed a petition against the forest sell-off and local groups were established across the country.

The days when sustainable development underpinned the government’s approach to the environment appear to be over. The Tory-led government (without a single Lib Dem in DEFRA) have taken an axe to the environment since coming to power last May, inflicting a 30 per cent cut in funding, the largest of any department.

In less than a year the Tories have tried to sell off our forests, cut funding by nearly a third for National Parks and tried to palm off nature reserves. We are still waiting for their waste review which was originally planned for last autumn. They have missed their own targets to “Buy British” and attracted criticism for their failure to show any leadership on food prices. Ministers appear to be on a collision course with all those who care about the countryside.

These are grim days for people who care about the environment. The reckless cuts in DEFRA matched by a drive to cut regulation threatens much of the progress Labour made over the last 13 years. The government is failing to provide the leadership or investment to protect the environment and deliver a low carbon economy Britain so badly needs.

The forests debacle has shown the public value the environment more than the government. It is up to all of us to hold ministers to account.

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.

9 Responses to “The government’s green-wash on sustainable development”

  1. GlobalZen

    – The government's green-wash on sustainable development

  2. mary creagh

    Govt doesn't get sustainable development – my latest piece for @leftfootfwd

  3. Laura E Grant

    RT @marycreagh_mp – Govt doesn't get sustainable development @leftfootfwd

  4. Dr Eoin Clarke

    RT @lgrantciwem: RT @marycreagh_mp – Govt doesn't get sustainable development @leftfootfwd

  5. Tom Chance

    Very persuasive, though Porritt has said a number of times that the Labour government also failed spectacularly on many of the points raised in this article.

    Most of his criticisms of this new document address the Government’s failure to redress the Labour government’s failures, e.g. consigning sustainable development to the Defra silo, and not getting to grips with the basically anti-green Treasury.

  6. Daniel Pitt

    The government's green-wash on sustainable development #ConDemNation

  7. Anon E Mouse

    Mary Creagh – How do you explain the fact that your government wanted a third runway at Heathrow and the Lib Dems in government ensured it was scrapped?

    This is a typical Labour attempt to rewrite history and the sooner people like you Mary, with your big government control freak ID Cards, 90 Day Detention, we know best style of leadership realise that the public are awaiting an apology for the mess you’ve left us in the better.

    Bet you didn’t vote for Ed Miliband Mary, anymore than the Labour party members did and this type of partisan, sanctimonious drivel serves only to remind people how bad the last government were.

    A bit more humility and a reminder of who pays your wages would go a long way towards redemption with the British people. This article most certainly doesn’t….

  8. Mr. Sensible

    Mr Mouse I’m afraid we’ve been there before.

    Yes they got rid of Runway 3, yes they got rid of several road widening projects (more by accident than anything else), but other than that the ‘Greenest Government Ever’ business has proved to be a load of hipe. Cameron himself admitted as much.

    Mary, was the Sustainable Development Commission one of those scrapped under the ‘Bonfire of the Quangos’, which we now know has well and truely burnt itself out?

    And this might be slightly off topic, but who decided that it was a good idea to replace a strategic approach to development in the shape of Regional Spacial Strategies with an approach like the New Homes Bonus? What sort of strategic approach is that?

  9. Anon E Mouse

    Mr.Sensible – You have indeed heard it often. That’s because it’s true.

    Anyway why is it you only answer some of my comments? I know you read my replies. What are you so scared of?

    The questions (recently) were regarding your support of the Guardian Media Group and their tax avoidance scam against Britain and the Labour councillor in Nottingham who is spending £hundreds of council taxpayers money on his pet projects whilst proposing cuts on services and finally my remarks on Labour being bust and Ed Balls fleecing his landlord an not paying his bills.

    Do you not have a single comment on those items? You raised them Mr.S not me. Well?

Leave a Reply