Shawcross: Londoners “paying more for less” under Boris

Boris Johnson claims that he has "done the impossible" by improving transport in London by "with £7.6 billion of cuts" - a far-fetched claim, explains Shamik Das.

Another day, another work of fiction from the Mayor of London in a right-wing newspaper. Fresh from his Telegraph column yesterday in which he said it was Labour’s plan “to get a load of aggressive crusties and Lefties to attack the Ritz hotel” and storm Fortnum’s, and that Ed Miliband and Ed Balls “will feel quietly satisfied by the disorder”, Boris Johnson claims on the front page of tonight’s Standard that he has “done the impossible” by improving transport “with £7.6 billion of cuts”.

However the Mayor’s business plan (pdf) – which will be put to the TfL board at City Hall tomorrow – reveals more than a third of the government’s £2.2 billion cut to London’s transport network will be passed directly to passengers, who are being hit by annual fare increases of 2 per cent above inflation for the next five years.

It also shows the bus subsidy will be cut by 40 per cent, £300 million will be cut from surface transport and £300 million from station upgrades and other capital programmes, with no reference to the Croydon tram project promised by the Mayor only last week, and no budget or timescale for Boris’s flagship Thames cable car.

Labour’s London Assembly transport spokesperson Val Shawcross told Left Foot Forward:

“Londoners reading the Standard tonight – maybe on a crowded tube – will realise that you can’t take cuts of almost £8 billion and improve the service. The idea is just ridiculous.

“The reality of the cuts Boris Johnson and the government are inflicting on London transport is that ordinary Londoners are paying more for less. Above inflation fare rises every year, job and service cuts, and fewer tube trains is the truth behind Boris’s spin.”

As Shelly Asquith said yesterday of the Mayor’s wider plans:

“Boris wants to ‘cut waste’: presumably 1,000 police officers and 800 tube staff are wasteful. Presumably, ‘investing in education’ means scrapping the Education Maintenance Allowance which saw thousands more students in London stay on in Further Education; removing 100% BSF funding, which would improve school buildings and increase intake numbers; scrapping 10 Sure Start centres in Brent, 9 in Hammersmith & Fulham, and 8 in Barnet.

“Boris has of course, stayed quiet on these proceedings, while uttering not a word on the prospect of £9,000 fees in conjunction with 80% cuts to London universities’ teaching budgets.”

And as tonight’s Standard editorial makes plain:

“…today [the Mayor] announced an additional £2.6billion of cuts in addition to £5billion already planned. He argues that these simply remove waste but, if not, any threat to service levels could end up being counter-productive. As we approach next May’s mayoral election, the stakes could not be higher…”

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

19 Responses to “Shawcross: Londoners “paying more for less” under Boris”

  1. Martin Johnston

    Boris Johnson? Oh, he's sooo funny! RT @leftfootfwd: . @ValShawcross: Londoners "paying more for less" under Boris:

  2. Finola Kerrigan

    RT @leftfootfwd: . @ValShawcross: Londoners "paying more for less" under Boris: reports @ShamikDas

  3. Northern worker

    Can someone please tell me why workers who don’t live in London are subsidising transport in London?

  4. Shelly Asquith

    Well worth a read, if only because it quotes me 😉 – Londoners 'paying more for less' under Boris (via @leftfootfwd)

  5. Eleanor Besley

    RT @leftfootfwd @ValShawcross : Shawcross: Londoners "paying more for less" under Boris

  6. Nick Theobald

    RT @leftfootfwd: . @ValShawcross: Londoners "paying more for less" under Boris: reports @ShamikDas

  7. Mr. Sensible

    Wonder what this does for the ‘Greenest Government Ever…’

  8. Len Duvall

    RT @leftfootfwd: @ValShawcross: Londoners "paying more for less" under Boris

  9. Daniel Pitt

    Londoners are paying more for less under Boris #ConDemNation

  10. salardeen

    RT @myinfamy: Londoners are paying more for less under Boris #ConDemNation

  11. Chris Hanrahan

    RT @leftfootfwd . @ValShawcross: Londoners "paying more for less" under Boris: reports @ShamikDas

  12. Chris Hanrahan

    RT @leftfootfwd . @ValShawcross: Londoners "paying more for less" under Boris: reports @ShamikDas

  13. TogetherForTransport

    RT @leftfootfwd: . @ValShawcross: Londoners "paying more for less" under Boris: reports @ShamikDas

  14. Shelly Asquith

    Boris Johnson isn't 'doing the impossible'. By cutting 1,000 livelihoods, he is simply doing the unthinkable

  15. Boris's transport boasts are pure piffle | Left Foot Forward

    […] London transport by cutting £7.6billion from Transport for London’s budget. As Left Foot Forward reported that day, his comments attracted the ridicule they […]

  16. Neil Young

    Shawcross: "ordinary Londoners r paying more 4 less"; annual above inflation fare rises, job/service cuts & fewer tubes

  17. Bitcoin Era Scammed You?

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  18. bitcoin wealth registration

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 19375 more Info on that Topic: […]

  19. cum se trateaza

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 90015 additional Info on that Topic: […]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.