In advance of the government launching its sustainable aviation framework consultation on Thursday, Natan Doron takes a closer look at the coalition's aviation policy.
Natan Doron is a research assistant at the Fabian Society; he has recently completed an MSc in Environment & Sustainable Development at University College London
Tornado fighter jets aside, it’s been a while since UK aviation policy has been front page material for The Times. Earlier this month, Left Foot Forward warned that aviation policy was becoming increasingly tricky. This week, in advance of the government launching its sustainable aviation framework consultation, 74 captains of industry have written (£) to the Times newspaper to complain that the coalition has no decent plans to address growing demand in the industry.
Phillip Pank, transport correspondent for The Times, writes (£) this morning that:
“A constant complaint from industry sources is that while they are clear what the government does not want – it overturned permission for a third runway at Heathrow and has ruled out new runways at Gatwick and Stansted – they have little idea of what ministers do want.”
The coalition agreement (pdf) promised no new runways at Heathrow, Gatwick or Stanstead. This promise was published under the climate change and energy section of the agreement. In theory, this implies that David Cameron and N ick Clegg think any new runway is a threat to the viability of UK climate change targets.
London Mayor Boris Johnson, meanwhile, has been warning of a new “monster” four-runway airport to be built from scratch in the Thames Estuary (no UK airport currently has more than two). This may be part of an electoral strategy that paints him as big business-friendly as well as distinct from his fellow former Bullingdon club members currently in Downing Street, but it provides a challenge to the coalition’s aviation strategy.
Today’s call from big business to accommodate expansion in the aviation industry or risk further damage to the UK’s sluggish recovery has considerably ramped up that challenge. Was the “greenest government ever” simply making symbolic gestures to the environmental lobby? Is Boris’s posturing just free-market, ‘whatever the consequences’ Tory-ism unmaksed?
There is scope for cross-party consensus to be built and agreement reached on new runways in other parts of the UK – Manchester or Birmingham perhaps – but this this is bound to stir environmental opposition. What is certain is that aviation policy is an area where Mr Cameron’s fragile coalition faces a true test of both its environmental and pro-business credentials.
Mid-term turbulence is kicking in.
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.