Vince Cable’s assertion that the Liberal Democrats are not guilty of reneging on their pre-election promises as they are simply honouring their commitment to the coalition agreement, will leave many wondering whether it is worth believing anything that the Lib Dems say - while in a revealing interview in the Total Politics December magazine, former Chief Secretary David Laws exposes just how much Nick Clegg's focus was, pre-election, on a hung parliament.
Vince Cable’s assertion that the Liberal Democrats are not guilty of reneging on their pre-election promises as they are simply honouring their commitment to the coalition agreement, will leave many wondering whether it is worth believing anything that the Lib Dems say – while in a revealing interview in the Total Politics December magazine, former Chief Secretary David Laws exposes just how much Nick Clegg’s focus was, pre-election, on a hung parliament.
Laws says:
“Nick Clegg had prepared very effectively, but very discreetly, for a hung Parliament scenario.
“We had a clear view about our policy negotiating strategy and priorities, a team established in readiness to negotiate, which had worked closely together for months, and a carefully co-ordinated process for internal party consultations.”
This puts Cable’s weekend comments into an interesting context. If they were planning to enter into some form of coalition agreement all along, the level of commitment the party had to these pre-election pledges appears questionable.
This also sheds more light on another of the Lib Dems’ broken promises, their deficit reduction plan. As Left Foot Forward has previously reported, pre-election it was made clear the Liberal Democrat plan was more closely aligned with Labour than the Conservatives. Just five days before the country went to the polls, Mr Clegg – when asked by Reuters about the Conservative party’s plans – said:
“My eight-year-old ought to be able to work this out – you shouldn’t start slamming on the brakes when the economy is barely growing. If you do that you create more joblessness, you create heavier costs on the state, the deficit goes up even further and the pain with dealing with it is even greater. So it is completely irrational.”
In light of what we have learnt from Laws, that Mr Clegg was, at the same time as he made all his promises, preparing for negotiations in a hung parliament scenario, it makes the deputy prime minister appear even more disingenuous and exposes a leader whose words are less than dependable. Cable’s eagerness to get out on a technicality, meanwhile, will only serve to anger, not repair the damage to the party’s prospects that has resulted from them breaking so many of their promises.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
24 Responses to “Laws: Clegg was preparing “very discreetly” for a hung parliament”
daniel vazquez
Laws: Clegg was preparing “very discretely” for a hung parliament: If you do that you create more joblessness, y… http://bit.ly/cMBk58
Deborah Segalini
William, if Cameron is not a tory, then what is he?
william
Deborah,it was not me that said he is not a tory.His alma mater has produced 19PMs, and his party makes Harriet Harman,Patricia Hewitt and others appear as innocents when it comes to getting rid of a certain election loser.HE is a Tory,because beneath it all, he was dead serious about getting into power,which was why ,conversely, he called himself ‘heir to Blair’.
jennifer roberts
RT @leftfootfwd: Laws: Clegg was preparing "very discreetly" for a hung parliament: http://bit.ly/djqqVF reports Rosanna Singler
Trakgalvis
Laws: Clegg was preparing "very discreetly" for a hung parliament http://tinyurl.com/35tlqav