Labour’s shrinking C2 and DE vote

In his Fabian Essay, reported in this morning's Guardian, Ed Miliband has written that the loss of less-affluent voters cost Labour the general election, and said that his rejection of "New Labour nostalgia" made him the modernising candidate in the leadership election.

In his Fabian Essay, reported in this morning’s Guardian, Ed Miliband has written that the loss of less-affluent voters cost Labour the general election, and said that his rejection of “New Labour nostalgia” made him the modernising candidate in the leadership election. Mirroring analysis published by Left Foot Forward in May, Miliband backed up his point about Labour’s lost voters in a study published this afternoon.

The analysis showed:

Labour’s share of the vote amongst C2s and DEs is down considerably more between 1997 and 2010 than the party’s decline in more affluent classes (see graph below);

• Labour lost 1.6 million voters in each of the C2 and DE groups compared to 0.5 million ABs and 1.2 million C1s;

• If each party had secured the same DE vote share in 2010 as they did in 1997 the election result would have been Labour 34% (instead of 30%), Conservative 35% (37%), Liberal Democrat 23% (24%); and

• The class profile of the UK has shifted markedly from 1997 to 2010, with ABs up from 22% of the population to 27%, C1s up from 27% to 29%, C2s down from 23% to 21%, and DEs down from 29% to 23%.

David Miliband, who along with his brother are front-runners in the leadership race, has also written a Fabian Essay, in which he argues Labour’s lack of a shared ideology is a problem for the Party when opposing coalition cuts; he writes that “voters – many of them our voters – spent the election wondering whose side we were really on”.

He added that Labour needs its “own story of political economy that embraces neither the masochism of George Osborne nor the denial of economic reality”. Diane Abbott, Ed Balls and Andy Burnham have also written essays.

The latest Labour List Labour leadership survey, meanwhile, places Ed Miliband narrowly ahead among first preferences, with a 33.4% to 30.2% lead over his brother. The self-selective Labour List survey was conducted between 1.30pm on Monday 9th August and noon on Friday 13th August – 912 readers participated, 83% of whom said they were party members.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

26 Responses to “Labour’s shrinking C2 and DE vote”

  1. Jo Jordan

    Does it say something about the British mentality that we don't go from class A to B to C to D but from D to C. . . http://ow.ly/2qe0c

  2. Robert

    Who cares anymore, the next time I will vote will be a show of hands on whether I go to heaven or hell, so long as Blair goes first and then I’ll go the other way.

  3. Fat Bloke on Tour

    Mr Mouse

    Surely not, the right wing upper middle class establishment working with the Treasury and the BoE to wave a shroud in a very energetic manner?

    Consequently are wrong and you were right.

    Wrong — The cuts will hurt no matter what happens, the ConDemNation are all fully paid up members of the Dog Boiling agenda. Any extra money will be tax cuts not spending increases, sorry smaller reductions compared to today’s budgets.

    Right, but not now — Before the nihilistic / sado masochistic cuts put forward by Sniffy then there was good chance fo a growth and tax rebound. AD had fully bought into the re-balancing agenda, public sector squeeze when approprite not slash and burn just for the sake of it.

    It will be beyond irony if Sniffy misses out on the recovery because of his wilful destruction of the public sector. I fear someone is about to experience a second dimension to his economic education, unfortunately at a horrible cost not only to his political reputation but also to the employment prospects of millions of British workers.

    He is a muppet economically, out of his depth to a frightening degree.

    You were warned but like millions of others you would rather have a severe thrashing from one of your betters than a balanced recovery from a party who wore a donkey jacket in your lifetime.

  4. NewLeftProject

    RT @leftfootfwd: Labour’s shrinking C2 and DE vote: http://bit.ly/azPhdd – More on @Ed_Miliband’s analysis of why Labour lost

Comments are closed.