The paradoxical stability of welfare expenditure (and why we should be spending more)

Whether they express their views in the élite language of economic or fiscal ‘unsustainability’ or the demotic of ‘welfare scoungers’, everyone apart from a handful of unreconstructed egalitarians seems to agree that welfare spending is too high.

Whether they express their views in the élite language of economic or fiscal ‘unsustainability’ or the demotic of ‘welfare scoungers’, everyone apart from a handful of unreconstructed egalitarians seems to agree that welfare spending is too high. Not that anyone feels obliged to specify a level of spending that would not be too high: everyone knows that it’s going through the roof, and that’s all that matters.

As the Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander put it recently:

“The welfare bill has ballooned by £60bn in 10 years. Failing to tackle this would make it impossible to deal with our debts without cutting essential services.”

Allowance made for the difficulty of getting complex messages across in newspaper opinion pieces, it has to be said that that £60 billion figure is a little too open to misinterpretation for comfort. It includes all expenditure on state pensions, pension credit and disability benefits to the retired as well as all tax credit expenditure: but it could easily be read as referring to the other kind of welfare, the one that everyone knows is too high, out-of-work benefits paid to working age adults.

Of the £60bn increase referred to by the chief secretary, less than a fifth will be accounted for by those benefits, and most of that is due to the massive rise in unemployment since the crash of 2008 – affecting spend on Jobseeker’s Allowance, housing benefit and the new Employment and Support Allowance. Only about 6 per cent of the figure is explained by increased spending on working age benefits prior to the crash.

The chart below shows the social security elements contributing to real terms growth in welfare spend over the last ten years, pre- and post crash (it doesn’t include tax credits):

Apart from housing benefit and disability living allowance, both targeted for arbitrary cuts in the budget, working age social security payments fell prior to the crash- and that includes spend on the much-maligned and much-misunderstood Incapacity Benefit caseload, which started falling mid-decade.

Even were it not so open to misintrepretation, Mr Alexander’s £60bn is the wrong sort of figure to be focussing on. A cash figure taken in isolation, even expressed in constant prices, tells us nothing about the economic or fiscal sustainability of welfare expenditure, because what is important to that question is the share of expenditure in total national output.

The chart below shows how welfare’s share of GDP has developed over the last 20 years; in this case, tax credits and child benefit are also included in the welfare figures:

Welfare-expenditure-as-a-share-of-GDP

What it shows is not out of control growth but overwhelming stability. Welfare spending grew as a share of GDP during the early 1990s recession, fell in the mid-to-late 1990s and stabilised from 1998/9 to 2008/9. During that period, it never deviated more than .2 of a percentage point from its average of 10.7 per cent, slightly lower than in 1991-2.

It rose rapidly with the financial crisis, and on current projected figures was slightly higher in 2009/10 than at its previous peak in 1993/4. As visual inspection of the chart shows, this difference is entirely explained by expenditure on the retired. Working age and childrens’ welfare payments are at exactly the same point as at the earlier peak in welfare expenditure.

So despite population ageing, greater welfare generosity under Labour and a much deeper recession than that of the early 1990s, welfare expenditure has not ballooned, gone through the roof, exploded, hit unsustainable levels or whatever other glib phrase people want to use to describe what didn’t happen over the last ten years.

Is this good news? Obviously it’s not helpful if you’re trying to build the case for welfare cuts on claims about spending which fly in the face of the evidence. But for those who have no ideological investment in myths about welfare spending under Labour there may nonetheless be a downside to the paradoxical stability of welfare spending.

With the major increases in welfare generosity over the last ten years – particularly through tax credits – it’s hard to shake the feeling that welfare’s share of GDP spending ought to be higher than it is given current rates of unemployment. In fact, increases in generosity were largely directed at those with children and the retired.

The bill for Jobseeker’s Allowance, on the other hand, rose by about £2bn in 2008/9 prices during the recession: that is not a high price for accommodating a rise of more than 600,000 in claimant unemployment. Part of the explanation for the fact that welfare expenditure on working age adults isn’t higher now than it was in the early 1990s will lie in the continuing stinginess of payments to those without children – and they are going to get stingier as the shift to CPI uprating kicks in.

Those who are opposed to the Coalition’s more arbitrary and unfair welfare cuts need to see off the myth of ever-increasing welfare expenditure which is being used to justify them – but that might mean having to think the truly unthinkable and say the unsayable: we aren’t spending enough on welfare.

Sources:

DWP Benefit Expenditure Tables updated March 2010

HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics April 2010

HM Treasury Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses July 2010

PESA previous years

GDP deflator

GDP time series

nb. ‘Welfare’ in the charts is the sum of DWP pensions and benefits, tax credits and child benefit. Because some departments other than DWP also pay benefits which are included in social security expenditure in official sources such as the FSBR and the Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses figures will not precisely match those in the official series

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

138 Responses to “The paradoxical stability of welfare expenditure (and why we should be spending more)”

  1. Mr Farty Pants

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  2. Brian Kellett

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  3. A J Horniman

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  4. Richard Alexandar

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  5. Dino Goldie

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  6. Jan O'Malley

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  7. A J Horniman

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  8. Jules Clarke

    Those opposed to Coalition’s arbitrary/unfair welfare cuts need to see off myth of ever-increasing welfare expenditure http://t.co/UnRMBpwP

  9. doasyouwouldbedoneby

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  10. doasyouwouldbedoneby

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  11. Ian Davies

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  12. Ian Davies

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  13. Sam Barnett-Cormack

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  14. June Mason

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  15. Mo Lawless

    Interesting blog on welfare spending, bit old but still relevant #wrb http://t.co/xSHCHwQF

  16. Just Me

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  17. Jane Wuster

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  18. Stephen Crowther

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  19. David Gillon

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  20. Jill Hayward

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  21. Helen Bryant

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  22. Chris Gregson

    “@djmgaffneyw4 is like a welfare magician!! Show him how much we love him and RT!!!! http://t.co/2pmuYgwG”
    #wrb #spartacusreport

  23. Mr Mojo Risin

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  24. JCody1985

    I would urge anyone on the left to read more about MMT as well, it completely destroys all of the the neo-liberal myths that are damaging to ordinary people, especially the nonsense about welfare being unaffordable. Here’s some links to get you started.

    This is an interview with professor Bill Mitchell giving a brief explanation.

    http://hir.harvard.edu/debt-deficits-and-modern-monetary-theory

    This is a small book by Warren Mosler called the the seven deadly innocent frauds of economic policy.

    http://moslereconomics.com/wp-content/powerpoints/7DIF.pdf

    Here’s some MMT blogs where you can find much more information relating to it.

    http://neweconomicperspectives.org/

    http://neweconomicperspectives.org/p/modern-monetary-theory-primer.html

    http://mikenormaneconomics.blogspot.co.uk/

    http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/

    There’s plenty more once you get into it, I really think it’s important that more on the left know how our monetary system works, to counter the nonsense from the right wing.

  25. Verity

    The paradoxical stability of welfare expenditure (and why we should be spending more) http://t.co/1ZxmclmE

  26. Verity

    The paradoxical stability of welfare expenditure (and why we should be spending more) http://t.co/1ZxmclmE

  27. Thomas Hemingford

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  28. sean

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  29. Sam Downie

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  30. Rose

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  31. Jenny Archer

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  32. Delroy Hibbert

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  33. Declan Gaffney

    @MasonDAutistic bottom line is working age & children welfare spend as % GDP falls 95-2000 then stable till recession http://t.co/oqoHz8yE

  34. Declan Gaffney

    Welfare spending fell as share GDP from mid-90's to 2000, then stable till recession.
    http://t.co/oqoHz8yE #newsnight

  35. Brian Tomkinson

    Welfare spending fell as share GDP from mid-90's to 2000, then stable till recession.
    http://t.co/oqoHz8yE #newsnight

  36. Stuart White

    Welfare spending fell as share GDP from mid-90's to 2000, then stable till recession.
    http://t.co/oqoHz8yE #newsnight

  37. Chris Goulden (JRF)

    Welfare spending fell as share GDP from mid-90's to 2000, then stable till recession.
    http://t.co/oqoHz8yE #newsnight

  38. Mason Dixon Autistic

    @MasonDAutistic bottom line is working age & children welfare spend as % GDP falls 95-2000 then stable till recession http://t.co/oqoHz8yE

  39. Steve Walker

    http://t.co/4Y6UUXC6 Are we REALLY spending 'unsustainably' on unemployment benefit? #UKuncut #moti austerity

  40. Mark Naylor

    “@djmgaffneyw4 : No "unsustainable rise" in welfare payments. http://t.co/2pmuYgwG” In fact, RT til your twinger bleeds!!!! #wrb

  41. Kirst

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

  42. Rob Trotter

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

  43. Robert Clayton

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

  44. Patrick Mc Grath

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

  45. WorkfareProtest

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

  46. Teddy Mcnabb

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

  47. claudiawood

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

  48. Jamie Cartwright

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

  49. BevR

    Bored now. IDS ' the welfare bill increased by some 40% in real terms' Chart 2 shows spend as %GDP. http://t.co/oqoHz8yE Please desist.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.