New statistics out today show a continued and rapid decline in net immigration to the UK: net migration to the UK in the year to September 2009 was 142,000.
New statistics out today show a continued and rapid decline in net immigration to the UK. Net migration to the UK (the surplus of people immigrating over people emigrating) in the year to September 2009 was 142,000. This compares with 160,000 in the year to September 2008 – a decline of more than 11 per cent.
Declining net emigration by British citizens included in this figure disguises an even more dramatic fall in net immigration by non-British citizens, which was just 185,000 in the year to September 2009 – down almost 27% on the year to September 2008 and compared with peaks of well over 300,000 in 2004/05.
Most striking is the fact that the UK is now seeing net emigration by citizens of A8 countries, for the first time since EU accession – 12,000 more A8 citizens left than arrived in the year to September 2009. There have also been dramatic falls in asylum applications, which were 48 per cent lower in the first quarter of 2010 than in the first quarter of 2009.
Grants of settlement rose significantly in the year to March 2010 – this reflects historical immigration patterns (settlement follows immigration with a lag of several years), and may also reflect migrants’ concerns that their ability to settle in the UK will be restricted in the future.
All this looks like good news for the Government, who this week reiterated their aim of reducing net immigration to tens of thousands, rather than hundreds of thousands. If current trends continue, the Government may be able to reach this goal without major policy changes – net immigration of under 100,000 looks more and more likely; what sounds like a radical policy shift may turn out to be no more than a matter of taking credit for existing migration trends.
However, this would surely not satisfy those who want to see a drastic reduction in immigration to the UK. A recent ippr report shows that net immigration levels of 40-50,000 (as called for by groups such as the cross-party Balanced Migration Group) will not be achieved without the introduction of major restrictions on migration to the UK for highly-skilled workers and the family members of UK citizens and residents.
The Government’s policy of introducing a cap on economic migrants from outside the UK will be made easier by the fact that applications for employment visas with the possibility of settlement (tiers 1 and 2 of the points-based system) were down almost 15 per cent in the first quarter of 2010, compared with the first quarter of 2009 – but the Government would be wise to tread with caution as they set the cap. Restrictions on the ability of UK employers to bring highly-skilled workers from outside the EU could harm both public services like the NHS and the economic recovery.
Continued declines in net immigration also call into question the likelihood of the much-discussed prospect of the UK population reaching 70 million in the next 20 years. The most recent ONS population projections assume a long term net immigration level of 180,000 per year, 187,000 for 2008/09, and 205,000 for 2009/10 – all significantly higher than the 142,000 for the year to September 2009.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
7 Responses to “Will the immigration cap just be legislating for existing trends?”
B Latif
RT @leftfootfwd: Will the immigration cap just be legislating for existing trends? http://bit.ly/ckoSGw
Immigration Tips
Will the immigration cap just be legislating for existing trends …: New statistics out today show a continued an… http://bit.ly/a4L9UD
Mr. Sensible
This is absolute nonsense.
The best way to control migration is to have something like the points system, not some artificial cap.
Sarah, this cap idea is absolute nonsense.
I think I’m right in saying that London First criticized the policy.
The best way to control migration is to set criteria, like the points system, not some artificial cap.
This was a nonsensical idea by the Conservatives, and the Lib Dems have swallowed it whole.
Sarah Mulley
Mr. Sensible – I absolutely agree that the cap is a stupid idea (see https://www.leftfootforward.org/2010/04/camerons-immigration-cap-do-the-numbers-stack-up/), and that the points approach is much more sensible. The point I was trying to make here is that migration is falling anyway, so the Government may just be taking credit for existing trends if they introduce a cap…the policy fails on its own terms as well as on ours!
Mr. Sensible
That reenforces it then, Sarah.
I can’t believe the Lib Dems are endorsing a policy that Clegg had a go at on the TV debate.
The coalition seems to be made up of a lot of Cameron and not a lot of Clegg.