The George and Vince show may get ugly

Heir to the Baronetcy of Ballentaylor, Mr Osborne has a degree in history and has never had a job outside of Westminster politics. An intellectial giant? No.

George Osborne, the Prime Minister’s closest political ally, has been confirmed as our Chancellor. As part of the coalition deal with the Liberal Democrats, Vince Cable will be playing a significant supporting role with a specific focus on business and the thorny issue of banks. The key question for the country is whether this team is capable of managing the economy through one of the most difficult periods in British history.

On personality, the differences are clear. A grammar school boy educated at Cambridge, Dr Cable has a PhD in Economics and has lectured on the subject at the London School of Economics. Having worked in Africa as a Treasury adviser, he published a number of academic papers whilst gaining high profile private sector experience as Chief Economist to Shell.

Heir to the Baronetcy of Ballentaylor, Mr Osborne has a degree in history and has never had a job outside of Westminster politics. It is clear who carries more intellectual weight.

On policy, the differences before the election were there for all to see. On banking reform, Dr Cable was an early and strong advocate of breaking up banks into smaller entities. Mr Osborne presented a less clear argument, arguing on the one hand that he would support President Obama’s financial reforms even before their details were revealed, but on the other stating at Davos that:

“I fully understand that modern universal banks need to offer their customers investment-banking services.”

And the Lib Dem’s hard-line position on capping bankers’ bonuses may be hard to swallow for a Prime Minister who trumpets ‘the City is in my blood’. The Chancellor also suggested, pre-election, that shares in publicly owned banks could be sold at a discount to small investors as a way to recapitalise the poor. The ridiculousness of this proposal was pointed out not only by this blog, but by Dr Cable himself, who at the time suggested that the plan “beggars belief”.

Last year Cameron pledged to abolish Regional Development Agencies, with Eric Pickles stating that ‘RDAs are unaccountable, unelected and they will be abolished”. In contrast, the Liberal Democrats’ “Fair and Sustainable Economy” release fronted by Dr Cable and the new Deputy Prime Minister, pledged to take economic regionalisation even further, putting in place both ‘local enterprise funds’ and even regional stock exchanges.

The Chancellors’ debate before the election highlighted the many differences between Dr Cable and Mr Osborne, not least on the management of the economy. Calling Mr Osborne’s proposals to rely on efficiency savings to halt the rise in National Insurance “utterly incredible”, Dr Cable also referred to business support for Mr Osborne’s pet policy of an NI tax cut “nauseating”.

And his position on the timing of cuts in public spending cuts could not have been clearer – too early would risk the recovery, and the Tories were wrong in trying to further reduce spending this year. In his own words: “The Tories presided over two big recessions in office, they wasted most of the North Sea oil revenue, they sold off the family silver on the cheap. Now they want to have another turn to get their noses in the trough and reward their rich backers”

Today we are beginning to see how this uncomfortable arrangement will operate. A centrepiece of the Tory reform plans was to disband the Financial Services Authority, placing its responsibilities in the keep of the Bank of England. It appears this morning that the Chancellor has backed down on this costly, apparently pointless policy, under pressure from the Liberal Democrats.

In return, Dr Cable has entirely reversed his position on the timing of cuts in public spending, today arguing that in the last two weeks a number of factors have convinced him that the Tories were right in the first place. This quite astonishing volte face is in sharp contrast to the straight-talking, honest politician he has previously presented himself as.

Coalition government of this nature is new to all of us. Compromises will have to made across a range of policy issues – and most importantly on the issue of the economy. Keeping the inexperienced Tory economic team in check will be a welcome result. However progressives in this country – many of whom wholeheartedly accept the rationale for a stable Con-Lib pact under current circumstances – do still expect the Liberal Democrats to act with principle and decency.

If what we end up with is Nick Clegg pretending to support ill-thought out Tory economic policy from the despatch box in gratitude for the granting of a referendum on the electoral system, then the laudable stance of acting in the national interest may well begin to unravel.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

23 Responses to “The George and Vince show may get ugly”

  1. David Morton

    Oh I *do* hope so…in fact I'm relying on it: RT @leftfootfwd: The George and Vince show may get ugly:

  2. sally mumby-croft

    RT @leftfootfwd: The George and Vince show may get ugly:

  3. Sean Sayer

    RT @leftfootfwd: The George and Vince show may get ugly:

  4. ray campbell

    RT @leftfootfwd: The George and Vince show may get ugly:

  5. James Roberts

    RT @leftfootfwd: The George and Vince show may get ugly:

Comments are closed.