The proportion of MPs that went to private school is five times that of the population as a whole - an increase from the last parliament.
The proportion of MPs that went to private school is five times that of the population as a whole – an increase from the last parliament. The new parliament sees the number of ethnic minority MPs almost double from 14 to 26, while the number of female MPs also rose – though by less than 2.5 percentage points, from 126 out of 646 in the last parliament, to 142 out of 649 today.
A new report out yesterday, published by the Sutton Trust, shows that 35 per cent of MPs elected last week were privately educated; the figure for the 2005 intake was 32 per cent, and for the general public it is just 7 per cent.
It also reveals that many more Liberal Democrat than Labour MPs went to private school – 40 per cent compared to just 15 per cent; more than half of Tory MPs went to private school. The percentages going to Oxford or Cambridge are: Tories (38%), Lib Dem (28%), Labour (20%), though the overall proportion is down slightly.
In terms of ethnic minority representation, the Liberal Democrats still don’t have a single non-white MP; there are 15 Labour and 11 Conservative – an increase of nine, including the first ever black woman and first asian woman to be Tory MPs. Last week also saw the election of the first female Muslim MPs, Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi (Bolton South East), Shabana Mahmood (Birmingham Ladywood) and Rushanara Ali (Bethnal Green and Bow).
The number of female Tory MPs increased from 18 to 48, with the figure for Labour falling from 94 to 81 – though rising as a proportion from 27 per cent to 31 per cent – and the Liberal Democrats’ figure down from nine to seven. The small overall rise, however, was described as “derisory” by the Centre for Women & Democracy.
Nan Sloane, director of the CWD, said:
“Although there has been a small increase in the number of women MPs at this election, it can only be described as derisory, and the next parliament needs to take clear action to ensure that we do not find ourselves in this situation again.
“We are well behind the majority of other European countries in this regard, and at the present rate of progress it will take decades – if not centuries – before women are properly represented in our democracy.”
In March, The Guardian had reported that:
“Evidence from the Equality and Human Rights Commission has shown that the movement of women into positions of power and influence has reversed or stalled. It likened women’s progress to a snail’s pace and said it would take a snail 73 years to crawl from Land’s End to John O’Groats and halfway back again before the numbers of women becoming directors of FTSE 100 companies was the same as men.
“The snail would have to cross the length of the Great Wall of China in 212 years before women would be equally represented in parliament.”
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
16 Responses to “2010 intake: More exclusive yet more representative”
Mr. Sensible
I notice that over the last few years the Tories have generally made the least amount of progress in this area, and Labour the most.
There’s a lot of debate about how to make politics more attractive to women.
I can’t say I’m terribly keen on all-women shortlists myself.
And Jane, at this rate we could see more women come in as another election is I think going to be heled later this year.
2010 intake: More exclusive yet more representative « The best Labour blogs
[…] More… […]
angus murray
RT @leftfootfwd: 2010 intake: More exclusive yet more representative http://bit.ly/bo1CQv
Lady J
People chanting ‘TORIES OUT, TORIES OUT’ outside the gates of Dowing Street. The BBC is trying to supress the sounds. These will be the words that will follow Cameron, whereever he goes. Get active people.
Robert
Disabled people I believe the last time I asked it was 0.4% total out of all parties. Working within Parliament it stands now at 1.76% the lowest of any work force.
A report in Jan 2010 reform the speaker put up the problems for the disabled in politics and the out come stated a pool of lost talent was being missed by Politicians and parties to get people interested and to take part, but the said that Parliament was so taken up with self interest it’s highly unlikely many people are really interested in the disabled or the sick, like me, people feel they should not be seen and not heard.