2010 intake: More exclusive yet more representative

The proportion of MPs that went to private school is five times that of the population as a whole - an increase from the last parliament.

The proportion of MPs that went to private school is five times that of the population as a whole – an increase from the last parliament. The new parliament sees the number of ethnic minority MPs almost double from 14 to 26, while the number of female MPs also rose – though by less than 2.5 percentage points, from 126 out of 646 in the last parliament, to 142 out of 649 today.

A new report out yesterday, published by the Sutton Trust, shows that 35 per cent of MPs elected last week were privately educated; the figure for the 2005 intake was 32 per cent, and for the general public it is just 7 per cent.

It also reveals that many more Liberal Democrat than Labour MPs went to private school – 40 per cent compared to just 15 per cent; more than half of Tory MPs went to private school. The percentages going to Oxford or Cambridge are: Tories (38%), Lib Dem (28%), Labour (20%), though the overall proportion is down slightly.

In terms of ethnic minority representation, the Liberal Democrats still don’t have a single non-white MP; there are 15 Labour and 11 Conservative – an increase of nine, including the first ever black woman and first asian woman to be Tory MPs. Last week also saw the election of the first female Muslim MPs, Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi (Bolton South East), Shabana Mahmood (Birmingham Ladywood) and Rushanara Ali (Bethnal Green and Bow).

The number of female Tory MPs increased from 18 to 48, with the figure for Labour falling from 94 to 81 – though rising as a proportion from 27 per cent to 31 per cent – and the Liberal Democrats’ figure down from nine to seven. The small overall rise, however, was described as “derisory” by the Centre for Women & Democracy.

Nan Sloane, director of the CWD, said:

Although there has been a small increase in the number of women MPs at this election, it can only be described as derisory, and the next parliament needs to take clear action to ensure that we do not find ourselves in this situation again.

“We are well behind the majority of other European countries in this regard, and at the present rate of progress it will take decades – if not centuries – before women are properly represented in our democracy.”

In March, The Guardian had reported that:

Evidence from the Equality and Human Rights Commission has shown that the movement of women into positions of power and influence has reversed or stalled. It likened women’s progress to a snail’s pace and said it would take a snail 73 years to crawl from Land’s End to John O’Groats and halfway back again before the numbers of women becoming directors of FTSE 100 companies was the same as men.

“The snail would have to cross the length of the Great Wall of China in 212 years before women would be equally represented in parliament.”

16 Responses to “2010 intake: More exclusive yet more representative”

  1. Shamik Das

    More female & ethnic minority MPs: RT @leftfootfwd: 2010 intake: More exclusive yet more representative: http://bit.ly/bo1CQv

  2. Jane

    Not enough women MPs
    The election is over. We may not know which parties will govern but we do know who the MPs are. It has been noted in the press that women MPs are in the minority. I can’t understand this myself. The parties did actively attempt to recruit female candidates but found it difficult to convince women to stand in the election. What is it that prevents women from taking an active part in public life? I watch endless news programs and there’s always a succession of men giving their opinions but as soon as a woman appears viewers are more likely to know her name than a male interviewee. This points to the scarcity of women MPs.

  3. sarah

    What are the stats on disabled MPs? Would be interesting to know.

  4. SadButMadLad

    With such low numbers it is technically possible to have good representation of female and ethnic MPs but in reality it is very difficult. Looking at the figures and saying that they are derisory is a bit like making people’s salaries match a bell curve. In reality salaries will fit in a bell curve but forcing salaries to fit a bell curve is stupid. The more numbers in your dataset the better the fit to the bell curve, or in the case of MPs better figures.

  5. Elaine

    When Obama won, Craig of Craig’s List is reported to have said “The policy wonks are coming to Washington and bringing their friends, the nerds.” (or vice versa). Hooray we said, ‘the reality-based community’ may return to government!!!
    I guess all you can say here is that “The chaps are back” and…..??????

Comments are closed.