Nick Clegg affirmed his progressive foreign policy credentials this morning, citing the £100 billion expenditure over the next 25 years on a Trident successor.
Nick Clegg affirmed his progressive foreign policy credentials this morning, citing the unwarranted near £100 billion expenditure over the next 25 years on the Trident successor.
Answering James Naughtie’s question about more limited nuclear deterrent options the Liberal Democrat leader cited the Astute alternative, which Left Foot Forward has advocated as a smaller scale, less costly alternative to Trident either in the form of a theatre based nuclear deterrence platform achieved through nuclear armed cruise missiles or by maintaining an intercontinental ballistic missile system but using a variant of the existing Astute class as the delivery vehicle rather then committing to the wholescale reaserach, development and construction process for a new submarine type.
Speaking on the Today programme Mr Clegg said:
“What we’re saying is there are a number of options that you could explore in the future… you could equip the Astute submarine. What we’ve done is, I asked Menzies Campbell to look at the range of options and he’s published a number of options simply to make the point which the other parties won’t even accept that there are alternatives to a like-for-like replacement for Trident.
“We haven’t yet settled on which of those options. What we’re doing is something the government are refusing to do, and the Conservatives refuse to do – they wont even include it in a future defence review. Whether we have a nuclear deterrent or not depends heavily on whether multi-lateral nuclear disarmament in the non-proliferation talks succeed or not I am a multilateralist
“I believe we should not just be throwing away our nuclear deterrent without any regard to what others are doing; all we are saying is that you shouldn’t rule in the option which we think is neither affordable nor strategically necessary which is the like-for-like replacement of Trident.
“Can I just spell that out for a minute neither of the other two parties accept this. Trident is a cold war nuclear missile system which was designed to flatten Moscow and St Petersburg at the press of a a butoon it will cost us £100 billion over 25 years. I think we are perfectlty entitled to say whatever we do in the fuiture let’s not pretend we either need or can afford the like-for-like replacement of that old cold war nuclear missile system.”
Listen to it:
In February, Left Foot Forward reported Liberal Democrat defence spokesman Nick Harvey’s remarks on Trident on Newsnight. Mr Harvey said that rather then a false choice between Britain as a nuclear power today or unilateral nuclear disarmament tomorrow:
“This nuclear deterrent (Trident) keeps us a nuclear power for another 20 years, the decision is whether we want one for 30 years after that.”
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
16 Responses to “Clegg: Replace Trident with Astute”
Benjamin A'Lee
Is replacing Trident with a cheaper nuclear weapons system really all that progressive? http://ur1.ca/tw1p (via @leftfootfwd)
uberVU - social comments
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by leftfootfwd: Clegg: Replace Trident with Astute: http://bit.ly/b7mI1d…
Clegg: Replace Trident with Astute « The best Labour blogs
[…] More… […]
Trident: what’s the Lib Dem alternative?
[…] Left Foot Forward Share this story with your […]
Look Left – The Week in Fast Forward | Left Foot Forward
[…] should be replaced with the Astute class submarine – the only main party leader to do so; he said: “All we are saying is that you shouldn’t rule in the option which we think is neither […]