Cameron’s foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain’s interests

Cameron’s “liberal Conservative” foreign policy will consign the UK to a period of parochialism and declining influence. Let’s hope it is exposed tonight.

Our guest writer is Tom Rafferty, a visiting research fellow at Peking University’s Center for International and Strategic Studies

David Cameron’s performance in last week’s leaders’ debate has been widely dismantled. But largely missing in the post-debate analysis was any reference to Cameron’s comment that the UK needed to maintain an independent nuclear deterrent because “we don’t know what is going to happen with Iran, [and] we can’t be certain of the future in China”.

This is a major diplomatic gaffe which, ahead of the second leaders’ debate on foreign policy, raises a number of questions about the Tory leader’s grasp of international politics. It is reflective of wider problems in the Conservative Party’s thinking on foreign policy.

Let’s get some facts straight. China is a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the only nuclear state with a ‘no-first-use’ policy. It has not been involved in a major military conflict since the Sino-Vietnamese War of 1979 and deploys more troops on UN peacekeeping missions than the US, UK and Russia combined.

China’s record on nuclear proliferation has not always met western expectations – it helped Pakistan develop nuclear missiles in the 1980s – but it is now a key partner in efforts to curb the spread of nuclear weapons and prevent them falling into the hands of terrorist groups. Beijing has a strong interest in preventing a nuclear arms race in East Asia and is committed (rhetorically at least) to a world free of nuclear weapons.

Identifying China with Iran as a comparable threat to international security is therefore bewildering. Tehran has pursued a uranium enrichment programme against UN Security Council resolutions, remains subject to wide-ranging international sanctions and is in possible violation of the NPT. Iran looks destined to become an international pariah state.

China is a country that has transformed itself over the past 30 years and adopted the principal norms and rules of the international system. Its economy is interlocked with our own. It is worth remembering that China has voted in support of UN sanctions on Iran in the past and is reported to be considering doing so again.

What, then, was Cameron thinking? A generous interpretation would put this down to a slip of the tongue and suggest he meant to say North Korea – but the Conservative Party has more or less confirmed that he intended to say China, suggesting Cameron only wanted to “demonstrate the extent of uncertainties in the world”. Indeed, he is rumoured to have made similar remarks at a local hustings earlier this week. The more likely explanation is therefore that Cameron holds some profound misconceptions about the nature of China’s rise and what it means for the UK’s national security.

It is difficult to think of one strategic scenario involving China that requires the UK to have nuclear capability. Is Cameron suggesting the UK involve itself in any conflict over Taiwan? Or is he seriously predicting that Britain will one day need nukes to keep an expansionist China at bay? Does he have a “yellow peril” vision of Chinese troops marauding over the Middle East and Europe? As with his economic policy, Cameron appears to be channeling the instincts of Margaret Thatcher. Whilst the rest of the world engages with China, he has positioned himself as an outmodish purveyor of China threat theory – a reincarnated “Cold War warrior”.

His comments have not gone unnoticed in Beijing. They only serve to confirm impressions here that the west prefers to arrogantly hector China rather than give credit for the progress that has been made. The government is disinclined to listening to such pontifications when China’s economy is currently driving global economic recovery.

Liberal Chinese scholars also point out that such comments only give succor to China’s policy hawks in the domestic debate on foreign policy. Whatever one thinks about China’s political system, the UK has no alternative but to work with China on a range of global economic, security and environmental issues. To presume otherwise would be seriously detrimental to the UK’s national interests.

The election has so far understandably focused on economic issues, but this has served to disguise what a shambles Tory foreign policy has become under Cameron. The decision to withdraw Conservative MEPs from the mainstream European People’s Party has left the Tories isolated in the European Union and potentially unable to effect change.

Cameron is apparently not highly regarded in Washington and his party’s Euroscepticism is viewed as unhelpful by the Americans. With his latest comments on China, Cameron has managed to alienate another key international constituency. Together the EU, US and China will shape the global politics of the 21st century.

The Conservative Party’s manifesto is very thin on foreign policy content. Beyond the obvious politicking on troop numbers and equipment, there is no vision of Britain’s place in the world. Major international security issues are reduced to vague promises. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, for instance, the Tories say they will “work towards greater stability” but set out no concrete prescriptions as to how they will do so.

The overall impression is of a party that has not only failed to engage in substantive thinking on international affairs, but is also fundamentally uninterested in the outside world. Cameron’s “liberal Conservative” foreign policy will consign the UK to a period of parochialism and declining influence. Let’s hope it is exposed tonight.

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.

12 Responses to “Cameron’s foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain’s interests”

  1. J Clive Matthews

    Foreign policy is my biggest worry: RT @leftfootfwd Cameron's foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain's interests: http://bit.ly/d2DCg5

  2. Andy Sutherland

    RT @leftfootfwd: Cameron's foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain's interests: http://bit.ly/d2DCg5

  3. Iain Murray

    RT @leftfootfwd: Cameron's foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain's interests: http://bit.ly/d2DCg5

  4. Jonathan Taylor

    "Cameron’s foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain’s interests" http://bit.ly/decDRm

  5. Daniel Gray

    RT @leftfootfwd: Cameron's foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain's interests: http://bit.ly/d2DCg5

  6. Left Foot Forward

    Cameron's foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain's interests: http://bit.ly/d2DCg5

  7. Jason Deabill

    RT @leftfootfwd: Cameron's foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain's interests: http://bit.ly/d2DCg5

  8. Olipro

    RT @Nosemonkey: Foreign policy is my biggest worry: RT @leftfootfwd Cameron's foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain's interests: http://bit.ly/d2DCg5

  9. Liberal Conspiracy » Thursday 22nd April

    […] Tom Rafferty: Cameron’s foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain’s interests […]

  10. Matt Lodder

    Cameron’s foreign policy ignorance damaging to Britain’s interests: Our guest writer is Tom Rafferty, a visiting r… http://bit.ly/aPSRuk

  11. Ross Cypher-Burley

    Tom,

    You present an intriguing argument as always, but i’m afraid I must disagree. There is simply no basis of truth in arguing that Beijing somehow regards the Conservative Party with concern. Think tanks, academics, and the Chinese government themselves have told me that they can’t wait to see the end of this Labour government. Only three months ago William Hague went to Beijing for a week long trip at their invitation, a trip was that extremely successful. At the same time, during the Chinese Ambassador’s goodbye reception at a London hotel, a Foreign Office Minister in his address described how spending time in Tibet was the most “spiritual experience of his life” and severely criticised China’s human rights record; two comments that the room was palpably shocked by.

    In terms of our attitude to China, we see China as a partner. We always have. David Cameron always has – his chief of staff Ed Llewellyn has lived in China, and served as Chief of Staff to Chris Patten during the transition of Hong Kong governorship. His relationship with Beijing is extremely positive.

    You say that there is no foreign policy vision in the Tory manifesto. Not true; but we all know that detailed foreign policy does not win votes in a general election campaign. You should take the time to read William Hague’s 90 minute highly detailed RUSI speech, he gave one last year and again an updated one this year. That comprehensively sets out the Tory foreign policy.

    In terms of the geopolitics of it; the only reason China will back UN sanctions is that historically it never wants to be isolated – as long as Russia is on board, China will not veto. And you know as well as i do that China in the past year has vetoed sanctions against Burma, Zimbabwe and North Korea. Beijing has some way to go in its approach to foreign policy too.

    And there is no way that anyone truly knows how committed China is to non-proliferation as their defence spending is completely secret; i’ve read varying estimations of how many long range and how many tactical nukes China has. But until China is more open with its defence spending and nuclear spending, we will never know.

  12. Sue

    In all my life I have never been afraid of a government but I am scared to death of Cameron and Conservatives. When he can prearrange that riots will be met with the army, and state that if British people do not like his radical cuts then “leave”, when he refuses to answer every question in Parliment, and knowing that his chancellor is buddies with Rothchild family, Cameron’s pre election statements, calling council house people “Council house trash” and working class people “Lazy workers” and telling the poor of Wales “It is your own fault you are poor”. He is aiming to break down the welfare state, and this will bring back the work houses. He is more like a dictator than a democratic. Leaving this country at the mercy of all via army and weapon destructions and he is going to do what no other government has done, Scotland and Wales will eventually no longer be part of Great Britain, and what do the people do? Nothing! Surely any Government that gets to be elected on lies to the extent Cameron lied, should be made accountable? The result was based on a con, and hence people should have the right to vote whether he should be allowed to stay in power.

Leave a Reply