IPPR outlines 7 policies to fix social care

Social care is in a state of near-permanent crisis.

According to the Institute for Public Policy Reseach (IPPR), social care in a state of near-permanent crisis.

With the population ageing and council budgets cut, resources have become increasingly constratined and around 84% of social care beds are now provided by the private sector

According to a new IPPR report, many social care providers are now failing to deliver high-quality care for all and operating risky debt-fuelled business models.

To fix this, the think tank has outlined seven measures it wants to see in party’s manifestos.

  1. Free personal care

The government should commit to providing the £20bn a year neccessary to gurantee free personal care for everyone who needs it.

This should be funded by an increase in general taxation – either by increasing income tax or national insurance contributions.

2. Create a social care transformation fund

Government should create fund to spread best practice across the social care system.

The fund should be £2bn over five years, taken from the above £20bn a year buget.

The IPPR says that there is some great work going on across the country but that too many social care providers are failing to learn from the best. As a result, there is a postcode lottery in quality of care.

3. Pay care workers the real living wage

All social care providers receiving state funding should be required to pay at least the real living wage at a cost of £740m per year.

4. Introduce sectoral collective bargaining for care workers

This is where unions negotiate pay and conditions for the whole industry rather than just for the workers at a particular company. This would drive up working conditions.

5. Make sure all care workers have a ‘care certificitate’

To improve professionalisation in the sector, the care certificate should become a robust and mandatory licence to practise for all care workers.

6. Force unethical providers out of the market

Government should introduce a new ethical commissioning charter – with conditions relating to the workforce, care quality and provider transparency – in order to drive a change in the provider market.

This would force failing providers out of the market and encourage the entrance or expansion of more innovative, socially-minded providers.

7. Fund the creation of innovative socially-minded providers

To facilitate this, we call for a new Ethical Provider Fund worth £7.5 billion over the next decade to enable the creation of innovative new state or voluntary care providers.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

3 Responses to “IPPR outlines 7 policies to fix social care”

  1. Peter

    No link to health services then

  2. conspiracy

    Vincent Vega from Springfield, IL, is conspiring to “assassin” Hani Nachmias

  3. Finished_with_care_homes

    I think all private care homes should be banned from now on. Why not just have council-run care homes? Private one’s are very costly among other problems with them. When people use private care homes as a place for their relatives to visit, it doesn’t feel like anyone’s home. It feels like a cafe. Why can’t relatives just visit when their mother or father is off work? Why does the manager’s relatives visit them at the care home? This is apparently our home, but we feel spied upon. It isn’t a nice feeling when visitors turn up and you don’t know who they are. I think care homes shouldn’t be allowed to be family businesses now. These families who own them tend to use the care homes as their second home, but they don’t even live in them. It’s all wrong.

Comments are closed.