Lucas's proposal drew criticism from across the political spectrum.
Green Party MP Caroline Lucas called on Sunday for a government of women to enable a referendum on Brexit.
Writing in the Guardian, she said that women “have shown they can bring a different perspective to crises, are able to reach out to those they disagree with and cooperate to find solutions”.
The women she invited to join her in this proposed cabinet are Heidi Allen and Anna Soubry, the SNP’s Kirsty Blackman and Nicola Sturgeon, Labour’s Yvette Cooper and Emily Thornberry, Conservative Justine Greening, Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson, Plaid Cymru’s Liz Saville Roberts and independent Sylvia Hermon.
The proposal seems to have drawn criticism from across the political spectrum. Here are five arguments from the Left and Centre against the idea.
- Gender has little to do with Brexit.
Like almost everything, Brexit will affect men and women differently. But the link between the two things isn’t clear or particularly strong.
The idea that women are naturally better at co-operation also drew criticism.
2. The women she names are all white
When questioned on this by Victoria Derbyshire, Lucas said that them all being white was “a real concern” but she chose them because they are leaders or deputy leaders of their parties.
It’s true that the leading women in the Liberal Democrats, SNP, Plaid Cymru and the TIG/Change UK parties are all white, as they are in the Greens. Lucas is right to say that is a problem.
However, she has chosen to name Yvette Cooper – who is not a leader, deputy leader or even a frontbencher.
She could have chosen Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott, who is of the same seniority as Emily Thornberry, who she did choose.
She could have also chosen Labour frontbench women of colour like Dawn Butler or Shami Chakribati. Or any of a number of pro-Remain backbenchers like Chi Onwurah who has campaigned with the ‘Love Socialism, Hate Brexit’ group.
3. Yvette Cooper is not pro-second referendum
While she’s been leading the fight against a no-deal Brexit, she hasn’t said she supports a second referendum – making her inclusion all the more open to criticism.
4. It’s not politically possible
Without at least a handful of Tory or DUP MPs supporting it, this ‘cabinet’ would not be able to win a confidence vote.
The sole Conservative included in the scheme is Justine Greening and winning her support for the idea, let alone that of any of her colleagues, will be difficult.
5. It won’t be seen as legitimate
The public will see a change of government without a general election as illegitimate.
You can (and I would) argue that a change of prime minister without a general election is also illegitimate but: a) two wrongs don’t make a right and b) changing governing parties needs more of a mandate than changing PM in one party.
If we want to change the government, it’s simple – we need a general election. All the signs are that we are about to get one so, other than generating publicity, the reason for this intervention is unclear.
Joe Lo is a reporter for Left Foot Forward
15 Responses to “Five problems with Caroline Lucas’s ‘cabinet of women’ idea”
Marian Skeen
I think it’s a great plan. Faced with the darkest times in our modern history Caroline Lucas is hard at work with a plan to save us. This is no time to faff about with finding the perfect group of MP’s covering all races, genders, religions etc. with a pristine clean record of voting in Parliament. We’ll be stuffed by then. She’s getting on and doing it without being diverted by grouse shooting.
I am an exasperated Labour member. Well done Caroline !!
bob murphy
good start which was going to upset the upset people. When god created man she was only joking. a snowball not a snowflake
Janet Marks
Very disappointed in Caroline Lucas choosing women from the Centre only. Just goes to show where her politics are based. Very LibDem. Shocking to see an all-white list. I thought we’d made some progress on that front.
Julia Gibb
When I look at some of the woman in the current Tory Party it proves just how wrong Caroline’s theory is.
Dave Roberts
This looks like the week for stupid statements, first Nigel Farage on the Royal Family and then this. This has done her possibly terminal damage. How on earth is the thing to be achieved? Legally it can’t so why did she make the statement in the first place.