Focus on merits of ESOL schemes, not political point scoring

English-language classes for immigrants are not simply fodder for opponents of Boris Johnson, says Maheen Behrana.

Migrants from Syria

After yet another hustings event showcasing the Tory leadership candidates, Boris Johnson has been reported as pledging to make all immigrants learn English.

Predictably, outrage ensued. While Johnson did not actually propose mandatory English lessons, he said in a Guardian article that there are “too many parts of our country … where English is not spoken by some people as their first language and that needs to be changed”.

It’s worth adding that the day before he made those comments, Parliament debated the issue of English-language funding cuts, including the effect on Syrian refugees trying to build a new life here yet struggling to access learning support.

However, once again Boris has got it wrong. If people in the UK speak a language other than English as their first language, then so be it, especially considering that the UK actually has one of the lowest rates of multilingualism in Europe.

Someone’s first language has no bearing on their ability to learn a second. But the Guardian has got it wrong too: portraying Boris as someone who would make immigrants learn English (thereby implying force) simply serves to distract us from a very important issue.

Yes, Boris Johnson may well be an intolerant nationalist, as suggested in the Guardian article. But believing we should help immigrants learn English should not be seen as representing a nationalist or even right-wing mindset.

In fact, back in 2011 it was David Cameron, pontificating about the failure of immigrants to integrate into UK society, who oversaw severe cuts to adult English-language classes.

Cameron’s reforms meant that many economically inactive migrants with a poor command of English (often people dependent on the income of other family members) would no longer qualify for free English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) teaching.

Only those on jobseeker’s allowance were eligible for free lessons; women whose husbands were in work, for example, did not qualify.

While proclaiming what immigrants ought to do, David Cameron removed the very means by which immigrants might do those things. And when in 2016, he pledged £20 million to help immigrants, particularly Muslim women, learn English, he was simply doing a U-turn, and half-reversing the cuts he had made earlier.

In the last census, just 0.3% of the UK population indicated they spoke no English. A further 1.3% defined themselves as speaking English, but not well. The numbers are small, but this actually catalyses a sense of perceived and actual isolation from wider society for people in these groups. Many of those affected by cuts to free ESOL teaching are women from minority backgrounds.

Co-director of the Social Action and Research Foundation Amina Lone notes that many individuals are in an impossible situation: they are demonised for not being able to speak English but not facilitated to learn it in any way.

So if Boris genuinely believes in helping immigrants to learn English, we should not overlook the potential benefits to score a political point.

But I fear his words are much like Cameron’s: sweeping statements underpinned by a desire to see a more homogeneous England. There is no real wish to help immigrants become part of British society, as the severe cuts to ESOL funding show.

Yet the Guardian is not helping when it leads with headlines like that: the real issues become lost in a spat between political right and left. And it is the people on the front line who are left to deal with the fallout.

Maheen Behrana is a writer and is an editor at

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

6 Responses to “Focus on merits of ESOL schemes, not political point scoring”

  1. Tom Sacold

    Learning the language is just the first step in integrating into normal British society and culture. But it is probably the most important step.

  2. Dave Roberts

    Another stupid racist article from a non entity. I went to school with Jews whose parents had difficulty in speaking English and whose grandparents spoke Yiddish. No English lessons paid for for they. They just got on with it. Stop whinging and do the same.

  3. Dave Roberts

    I have tried the website and it is for sale! It doesn’t seem to exist. Is this fake news? Editors we nee an explanation. I’m now going to check on the writer.

  4. Dave Roberts

    I decided to check this Social Action and Research Foundation and one of its directors Amina Lone, it and she are quoted as support for the basic premise of the article. It was founded even years ago and has published a half a dozen articles since then. It financial position is that it has £19 in the bank, its net worth is £-2.5K, has liabilities of £5K and uses an accommodation address. Ms Lone was deselected as a Manchester councillor by Labour as she had a very poor attendance record at meetings and didn’t do here work as a councillor.
    What we are increasingly getting are articles like this one which use the likes of Ms Lone as a sort of guarantor when in fcat they have credibility whatsoever.

  5. Dave Roberts

    Sorry about the typos in the above and would the writer like to make some comment?

Comments are closed.