A recent UN report shows in devastating detail how black and minority ethnic communities have been hit by the UK government.
At the end of May, a Special Rapporteur for the UN’s Human Rights Council reported on the state of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and other forms of racial and religious intolerance in the UK.
The findings of the report are shocking — or to use its own words “analogously grim”.
A combination of hostile immigration policies – remnants of the hostile environment era – and austerity measures have resulted in a rise in racially and religiously-motivated hate crime, racial profiling and socio-economic inequalities across the board in BAME (black, Asian & other minority ethnic) communities.
Cuts to public service sector funding have, readers do not need reminding, been devastating. In the last decade services key services have been slashed by up to 40 per cent.
These measures, according to the Special Rapporteur, have disproportionately impacted BAME individuals, families and communities in the UK.
“Austerity measures in the United Kingdom are reinforcing racial subordination”, her report damningly states. And there are several factors which play into this.
Black and Asian households have seen their living standards fall drastically since austerity measures were introduced. According to a report by Women’s Budget Group (WBG), black households have had a standard drop of 11.2 per cent, while Asian households have seen one of 11.6 per cent. In cash terms, this equates to a loss of £5,090 for black households, and £6,526 for Asian households.
According to the findings of the Race Disparity Audit taken in 2016, black and Asian children are twice as likely to be in persistent poverty and live in sub-standard accommodation than white British children.
With the cost to public finances from Brexit estimated at between 0.4% and 1.8% of GDP by 2030 (under May’s deal), and 1% to 3.1% under no deal, Brexit could result in anything from £9bn to £64bn of cuts, if the Conservative government follow their usual trend of cutting deficits through austerity. With this in mind, the living standards of BAME families are set to worsen.
As well as this, ongoing cuts (which have increased three-fold in most areas) to local funding have resulted in the closure of many small & medium-sized charities – a disproportionate number of which are targeted at BAME communities.
According to the UN report, for this reason (among others) BAME women continue to be hit hardest. Notably, that report also highlights the toll historical hostile immigration policies, which ultimately encouraged UK service-providers to act as immigration officers, have taken on the BAME community.
BAME women in particular, including domestic abuse victims on British Spouse Visas, and asylum-seekers and refugees, were found to be widely reported to the Home Office after seeking support from police forces and health-care staff during the hostile environment’s reign.
Although data-sharing policies are no longer officially in place, many BAME women are still frightened that they could risk their status and life in the UK if they looked for help from the NHS or the police.
The UN Special Rapporteur comments on this in her report, highlighting cases in which migrant and refugee women have been too scared to visit the hospital during their pregnancy and labour, for fear that they or their child could be reported and removed.
It’s time to focus on solving racial inequalities in the UK. Policies desperately need to be reviewed. Ultimately, more time, energy and resources need to be spent on tackling the issues highlighted by the UN, if the UK is to function as a fair, equal society.
Luna Williams is a political correspondent and editor for the Immigration Advice Service (IAS, a team of immigration solicitors that works with asylum-seekers, victims of domestic abuse and visa applicants.
5 Responses to “BAME communities are still being hit hardest by hostile Tory policies”
Tom Sacold
We all should be working for a meritocratic, colour blind, secular society.
Dave Roberts
I agree Tom but I’m afraid the snowflakes will always blame white people and demand preferential treatment for ethnic minorities. There are reasons white certain groups are more economically disadvantaged than others and it’s got nothing to do with discrimination, more choices.
Take Sikhs for instance. They are Asian and most arrived at about the same time as the West Indians, late forties early fifties. Sikhs have the highest proportion of home ownership of any group in the country closely followed by Indian Muslims who tend to be in the professions and business. The lowest achieving Asians are Bangladeshis with large families who have traditionally run restaurants which are now under threat from competition and fashion, curry is so yesterday!
Somalis and Eritreans have very large families, marry children off very young to start their own families, have low educational achievements and expectations and rely on state resources such as housing and benefits disproportionately.
The most recent wave of immigrants from Eastern Europe have high levels of employment and educational achievement, especially in English, and are integrating through intermarriage into society.
This report, like many others similar, is rubbish and is typical of a culture that promotes victim hood and entitlement.
Dave Roberts
It would be quite good if the writer of this piece were to reply to criticism and engage in a debate, but I’m not holding my breath.
Rebecca Ingles
Dave, get a life, you creepy incel. Not every reporter has time to engage with you as you touch yourself in the basement wanting a debate because you have nothing better to do.
Media Round-up: June 2019 - Womens Budget Group
[…] Foot ForwardBAME communities are still being hit hardest by hostile Tory policiesLuna Williams, 21st June […]