The Mail's piece was published just four hours after the blaze began
Within four hours of the Notre Dame cathedral catching fire, the Daily Mail had published an article questioning firefighters response to the disaster.
The fire started at 4.50pm and at 8.34pm, a Mail Online piece was publishead about how “many questions were raised as to how the fire was dealt with.”
The article continued: “There was criticism that the fire service had not responded quickly enough – and didn’t seem to have the right equipment to tackle such a large blaze. Flames appeared to be raging inside the cathedral for a long time before water jets capable of stopping them were mobilised.”
As evidence of this “criticism”, the article cited four twitter users, only two of whom are from Paris. There was no indication that any have expert knowledge of firefighting or of Notre Dame’s structure.
The French Civil Security Agency though said that this could damage the building, surrounding buildings and people. Unlike California’s forests, Notre Dame is surrounded by people and buildlings.
The article did not go down well in the Mail Online’s comments section. “The armchair experts are out in force I see, knowing everything about everything from the comfort of their sitting rooms,” said one.
“So here we go… start attacking the fire-fighters! Must be the thing to do these days…identical to how the firefighters were treated after Grenfell,” said another.
“The Mail’s already looking around desperately for somebody to blame,” said a third.
Joe Lo is a reporter for Left Foot Forward
Like this article? Left Foot Forward relies on support from readers to sustain our progressive journalism. Can you become a supporter for £5 a month?
Leave a Reply