If Debenhams bosses want to cut costs, they should start with their outrageous salaries

The company’s CEO, who looks set to cut 4,000 jobs, earned £1.3m for six months work

Today, Debenhams has announced that it needs to cut costs and will do this by closing up to 50 stores – putting up to 4,000 jobs at risk.

This is disastrous news for everyone who works at Debenhams, their friends and families and for the economy as a whole as 27,000 Debenhams workers tighten their belts.

Or should that be 26,699 Debenhams workers? One man who is unlikely to be tightening his belt is the company’s CEO Sergio Bucher.

In the 2017 fiscal year, Bucher earned £1.34M from Debenhams. Think that’s outrageous? Consider this: he was only with Debenhams for six months of that fiscal year, so that’s £1.3m for six months work.

What he earned in 2017/2018, his first full year in the job, has not been announced yet but it could well make painful reading for Debenhams workers.

Yet we shouldn’t single him out unfairly. The former Amazon executive is not the only one doing well out of Debenhams. In the same year, 16 senior executives were paid £6.1m by the company while the share price slid from £80 to £55 a share.

Meanwhile, Debenhams 27,000 employees took home just £408m between them all. This is an average of just £15k each in a year – although admittedly it does include 19,000 part-time workers.

According to the High Pay Centre, such huge pay for chief executives is not unusual. In the last 25 years, executive pay has quadrupled while workforce wages have barely kept up with inflation. The High Pay Centre propose putting workers on company boards, paying executives in cash rather than shares and bonuses and insisting on a 40:1 pay ratio between the highest-paid worker and the average worker. The current average pay ratio for FTSE 100 companies is 150:1 while some companies like John Lewis and TSB have a 70:1 policy.

Jeremy Corbyn has gone further, proposing a twenty to one pay ratio between the highest-paid worker and the average paid. David Cameron also suggested this – although he never followed through with it. In Debenham’s case, a 20:1 ratio would mean the average worker would have to be paid £70,000 or Bucher would have to be paid less.

The case for pay inequality is strong in any company but particularly in one where such drastic job cuts are on their way and where management are clearly failing to look after the business. Bucher should never have been allowed to take so much from a struggling company.

Read more of LFF’s pay inequality coverage here.

Debenhams did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Joe Lo is an investigative journalist and writes for Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter.

Like this article? Left Foot Forward relies on support from readers to sustain our progressive journalism. Can you become a supporter for £5 a month?

Leave a Reply