Raising the state pension age is regressive class politics – the Tories have no excuse for it

Forcing people to retire later is class politics dressed up as economic policy.

Has the British working class been politically so successful that its hard-won social rights are permanent? Or has it just secured some crumbs and concessions which can be eroded. The case of the State Pension age (SPA) provides some food for thought.

The SPA has a chequered history. For some time, the SPA was 65 for men, and 60 for women. Gradually, it has been equalised and then raised.

From December 2018 the SPA for both men and women will start to increase to reach 66 by October 2020 and then rise to 67 between 2026 and 2028.

Following lobbying by the Institute of Directors (IOD) the government plans to raise SPA to 68 between 2037 and 2039. Some want to raise SPA to 70. The rise in SPA is a cut in the entitlements of citizens.

The government has claimed that higher SPA is the price of gender equality. In addition, it claims that life expectancy has increased and therefore SPA needs to be raised “to protect public finance”. These claims are dubious.

The average life expectancy of a newborn baby boy and girl is 79.2 years and 82.9 years respectively.

Life expectancy is dependent on quality of food, healthcare and housing, which are a function of income and wealth.

Men living in Blackpool, with one of the lowest amounts of disposable income, have an average life expectancy of 75 years compared to 83 years for those in the City of London.

A girl born in affluent Buckinghamshire can expect to live for 87 years compared to 80 years in low income Middlesbrough. So the raising of SPA has hurt the poorest the most.

After years of austerity, low wages and cuts in social welfare, the rate of increase in average life expectancy has stalled and is declining.

The October 2017 statistics published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) estimates that by 2041 average life expectancy for men would be 83.4 years and 86.2 years and women.

Just two years earlier, the ONS had estimated life expectancy to be 84.3 years for men and 87.1 years for women.

A report issued by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to accompany the November 2017 budget noted that:

“For adults aged above the SPA [State Pension Age]: a large downward revision due to higher mortality rates at older ages than previously assumed. Total deaths for this age group average 502,000 a year in the new projections, up from 476,000 previously.

This is consistent with life expectancy increasing less than projected since mid-2014. By 2022, the population in this age group is 1.2 per cent lower than previously assumed”.

Despite knowing that life expectancy is declining, the government has not sought to freeze or reverse the rise in SPA.

The raising of SPA is likely to have saved the government about £5 billion a year. But it could have paid the pensions if it had the political will. It hands out £4-£5 billion in subsidy to privatised train companies.

Since 2015, the government has reduced bank levy by £4.7 billion, a tax cut for banks. Since 2010, corporation tax rate has been reduced and the cumulative effect of reductions is around £56 billion.

In April 2013, the government reduced the top marginal rate of income tax from 50% to 45%. This has reduced the cumulate income tax bill of the richest by around £8.6 billion.

Around £34 billion of tax revenues remain uncollected each year due to tax avoidance, evasion and other reasons. The government gives numerous tax reliefs to corporations, often without knowing the economic benefits.

It is estimated that some 1,128 tax reliefs costing some £334 billion a year are given. Overall, the government chose to increase SPA and the resulting savings have been passed in tax cuts to the rich and corporations.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) reported that the state pension for a typical British worker is about 29% of average earnings compared to an average of 63% in other OECD countries.

The full UK state pension is currently £159.5 per week (£8294 p.a.) and is utterly inadequate, assuming that people can get it in full.

Some people may supplement this with private pension schemes, but with low wages and savings many of tomorrow’s retirees will mainly be relying on the state pension.

At the very least, the state pension should not be less that the Living Wage and that won’t be achieved without people asking politicians uncomfortable questions.

Meanwhile, Sir Robert Devereux, the architect of higher SPA policies will retire next month from the Department for Work and Pensions at the age of 61 with a tax-free lump sum of £245,000 and an annual pension of £85,000.

The IOD so keen to raise the SPA forgot to mention that a typical FTSE 100 director  retires at 60 with a pension 25 times the average expected employee pension.

The SPA policies are the outcome of class politics often dressed up as economic policies. The less well-off are expected to be grateful for the crumbs that fall off the table. As always, the hard won-social rights need to be vigorously defended through political action.

Prem Sikka is Professor of Accounting at University of Sheffield and Emeritus Professor of Accounting at University of Essex. He tweets here.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

12 Responses to “Raising the state pension age is regressive class politics – the Tories have no excuse for it”

  1. LordBlagger

    The certainly do. You redistributed all the pension contributions. That leaves a debt. That debt is large. Currently the state owes 10,000 bn pounds for pensions. If we just look at the inflation increase, no increase caused by more contributions, that was 280 bn. That’s off the book debts. That’s caused by not investing the money but redistributing the cash. Spending it.

    If Mr Average retired today, and his NI had been invested he would have. 1.23 million in the bank. 40,000 a year in dividends.

    That’s what socialism has done to people. It’s screwed them out of the money.

    If we take your reliefs and look at someone on min wage. Top of your list is the personal allowance. Then there’s the 20% band instead of 40%.

    So get rid of your tax reliefs. That means someone on min wage has to pay another 5,676,80 in tax each year.

    Min wage tax dodgers eh.

    You ripped people off for their pension contributions, now you complain about the consequences.

  2. Norma paddock

    And what happen to my late husbands life time of NI contributions after he passed away at 60 never having claimed even one penny in sick ,unemployment or any other type of benefits,,I am left with only a 80%state pension and am not able to have it made up for my late husbands credits ,and widows pension is now ended

  3. Jane Davies

    Don’t forget that the UK is the only member of the OECD to freeze the state pensions of 4% of seniors just because of where they live in retirement, totally disregarding the fact they have paid into the NI scheme under the same terms as everyone else. For example if a pensioner joins their children and grandchildren and retires to Canada the pension is frozen at the amount of the first payment paid once there. But here’s the kicker, not everyone who retires overseas has their pension frozen, retire to the USA and one gets an indexed pension, in fact the majority of those who retire to another country have an indexed pension, just 4% are victims of this outrageous theft. Every opposition party has supported the ending of this rip off but once a party is voted into government this injustice is forgotten, therefore this has been allowed to go on for decades and the oldest and most vulnerable are getting a state pension of less than 20 pounds a week. So not only have this 4% had there cost of living increases stolen from them they are also victims of blatant discrimination from their own government.

  4. Peter McDonald

    It’s a disgrace that we have one of the lowest pension in the EU, even Spain has higher pension, Germany it is £400 a week, it’s about time we did something about.

  5. Bridget Green

    Waspi are fighting hard to right the injustice done to the women born in the 50’s. I have had a 6 year increase to my SPA with no notice. Dismissed from job on grounds of ill health no pension living of savings for next 4 years no letter no notice no pension

Comments are closed.