Dear Theresa May, holding hands with a fossil fool is not what strong leadership looks like

May has done nothing to safeguard the Paris Agreement


The Tories are good at grand rhetoric on the environment. From ‘the greenest government ever’ to ‘the first generation to leave our environment in a better state than we found it’, we’re often told how preserving the environment is a Conservative value. But while Thatcher may have been the first world leader to warn of climate change, Theresa May was happy to stand by and do nothing as Trump destroyed years of progress towards solving it.

The current Conservative manifesto claims that, if elected, a Tory government would ‘continue to lead international action against climate change’.  Yet from the G7 to stump speeches, May turned down every opportunity she had to try and protect what is undeniably the most important document for international climate cooperation. Of the world’s six biggest economies after the US, the UK was the only one not to say anything publicly about Donald Trump’s threat to leave the agreement.  

What makes it worse is that May should have been in a unique position to influence the Trump administration. Our special relationship was the very reason we were meant to tolerate the hand holding, state visit and May’s rush to Washington. Either this relationship is meaningless and the UK has no influence — in which case why not join the world in publicly condemning Trump’s actions — or May just doesn’t see climate change as a priority, unwilling to speak out for fear of upsetting the likes of trade deals post-Brexit.

Downing Street’s woefully weak reaction was the final nail in the coffin. Whilst everyone from Merkel to Trudeau personally spoke out against the move, reaffirming the importance of collective action, May hid behind a bland Downing Street briefing which expressed its ‘disappointment’. While Macron delivered a heartfelt message to the American people, May was nowhere to be seen.

Not only did she stay silent, but May actively refused to join our European partners in a show of solidarity, turning down the opportunity to add her name to a joint statement with France, Germany and Italy. As Jeremy Corbyn argued earlier today, given the chance to present a united front with our international partners, May ‘instead opted for silence and subservience to Donald Trump’.

Depressingly, this isn’t surprising. For all their slogans and rhetoric, the Conservative record on the environment is atrocious. The party that promises to lead on international climate change is the same party that was caught trying to water down the EU’s flagship energy efficiency policies. It is the same party that hit parts of the solar industry with an 800 per cent tax rise, and refuses to support onshore wind in England, despite it being the cheapest form of renewable energy. It is the same party that is in danger of missing the UK’s legally binding climate targets for 2030.

The Tory record on the environment is a litany of delays, broken promises and apathy. It doesn’t have to be this way. While May stayed silent as Trump attacked the Paris Agreement, Labour has pledged to stand up to the US on climate change and our shared values. A Labour government would put the UK back on track to meet its targets in both the Climate Change Act and the Paris Agreement. Rather than abandoning our international partners, Labour would work more closely to tackle a host of environmental challenges — from air quality to new environmental standards at the WTO.

As Britain prepares to leave the EU and start a new national chapter, we can’t afford a government that is content to do nothing and watch from the wayside. From the economy to climate change, we need bold and ambitious leadership – and Theresa May’s dereliction of duty over Trump shows she’s simply not up to the job.

Adam Dyster is National Organiser at SERA, Labour’s Environment Campaign

4 Responses to “Dear Theresa May, holding hands with a fossil fool is not what strong leadership looks like”

  1. Mike Stallard

    How very 1990s!
    Today in the 2010s, you have to prove Climate Change. The consensus has slipped away and nobody seems to have noticed. Debate, of course, is closed down. Even to question Climate change/AGW is heresy.
    But the 95% of scientists argument went ten years ago, windmills simply do not provide the electricity reliably and solar panels only work when the sun is at its zenith. Meanwhile electricity prices soar driving the aluminium and steel worked onto the dole along with coal miners and coal fired power station workers.
    I thought Labour supported such people?

    (PS Nobody dare ask this question: but here goes:
    The world is a very big and diverse place. Large parts of it are Oceans, Forests and Deserts. Other parts are not reliably measured. So how can we possible measure its temperature?)

  2. Greg

    I can not bring myself to believe in the CO2 scenario – I can believe that man’s emissions contribute to warming, but can not believe that it is the major part.

    But…I am not a scientist, and I have noted that many eminent scientist also disagree with the hypothesis.

    Indeed, via Labour List, I have come across this site which takes on the sceptics:

    Where I come from is this: If our politicians, scientists, and members of the green industry really believe in the theory, why are they partying like there is no problem?

    If our politicians fly around on unnecessary junkets, then why should I care?
    Similarly for pampered scientists and conference-attending green activists.

    I’m sick of the hypocrisy – my (very) modest lifestyle creates an almost unnoticeable Carbon footprint compared to our virtue-signalling MPs, MEPs, and climate industry freeloaders.

    In fact, and I am sure there are others, the only individual politician that I have heard of refusing to fly is the LibDems’ Sarah Fulford.

    Credit where it is due.

  3. Alma

    It is not the CO2 that is causing the warming! Think about the billions of cars that run at high temperature and millions of refrigerators and air conditioning that dissipate heat! Now thing about this planet that always had CO2 emissions form volcano, fires and so on. Now compare! Heat versus CO2! Why do they call it warming?

  4. Stephen

    The acceptance of anthropogenic climate change is so universal nowadays, even the most extremist right wing fools accept it, although not necessarily in public.

    Trump ‘does believe in climate change’, says US ambassador to UN

Comments are closed.