The British government can take this contentious issue off the table
If this week’s deadline to restore power-sharing in Northern Ireland founders, then one of the main reasons will be a failure to get agreement on measures to recognise the Irish language.
Despite being a feature of repeated deals over the past twenty years, no legislation has been passed giving Irish the same status as English. To Sinn Féin, this is a breach of trust, evidence of the Democratic Unionist Party’s ‘arrogance’ and their lack of respect for Irish identity.
But it matters more broadly to nationalists and native Irish speakers because of the effects of centuries of British rule, which saw determined attempts to wipe out the Irish language altogether.
The Democratic Unionists, often derisory about the importance of Irish for the most sectarian of motives, now complain about the costs, putting the price of implementing a language strategy at £100m. There is no credible basis for this figure and most estimates put the costs of adding bilingual road signs and the like at a twentieth of that.
True, the implications may rise if Irish is put on a par with, say, the Welsh language, which is now embedded in the fabric of the judicial system and public sector. But if it can be done in Wales, why not in Northern Ireland?
Welsh was granted equal footing with English in courts as long ago as 1967. This was strengthened by an Act of Parliament in 1993 to ensure:
“…in the course of public business and the administration of justice, so far as is reasonably practicable, the Welsh and English languages are to be treated on the basis of equality.”
Cultural respect matters and the point of the Good Friday Agreement was to accommodate Irish identity within the context of the overall deal.
Alas, part of the reason the Executive collapsed in January was because the DUP’s communities minister, Paul Givan, axed a grant to an Irish language charity while rewarding unionist marching bands instead.
Lost amid the fallout from the elections, however, was the successful legal challenge mounted by an Irish language group over the failure to implement a strategy for the Irish language.
Last month, the High Court ruled the Executive had failed in its duty to implement a scheme after a commitment to do so was made by British ministers at the St Andrews’ talks back in 2006. Essentially accusing the Executive of dragging its feet, the judge concluded that:
“It cannot have been the intention…after nearly 10 years from the coming into force of the Act in 2007, this obligation would remain unfulfilled.”
Here’s the thing. If James Brokenshire, the Northern Ireland Secretary, was smart, he would remove this particular obstacle by pointing out to the DUP that the High Court decision offers a climbdown and honourable retreat on this issue. (Pedants may argue a ‘strategy’ is not an ‘act,’ but this is splitting hairs).
He could then address the cost issue by simply underwriting the costs of implementing an Irish Language Act/strategy.
Even if Arlene Foster’s ludicrous overestimate was even remotely accurate, picking up the tab would be a drop in the Irish Sea. Cheaper, certainly than the inducements that will otherwise be needed to get everyone around the table if this process collapses.
Such a move would help to break the stalemate that looks likely scuttle talks this week. With the Irish Foreign Minister, Charlie Flanagan, joining the negotiations today it might be the last best chance to avert the cliff edge.
Will Brokenshire seize the initiative?
Kevin Meagher is a former Special Adviser to Labour’s last Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward and author of ‘A United Ireland: Why unification is inevitable and how it will come about,’ published by Biteback
As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.
We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.