If the Brexiteers are coming for our workers’ rights, they’d better do it out in the open

No one voted for weaker workplace protections

© UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor

Today, Theresa May unveiled her plan for the UK outside of the EU. Those working in public services are rightly concerned by what Brexit might have in store for them. While it is certain that the UK will leave the EU there are still huge choices for the Prime Minister to make.

Leaving the single market and turning the UK into a low-tax, low-regulation island off the coast of continental Europe may be how many Tory Brexiteers see our future — but for anyone who relies on the protections at work, who relies on public services or who provides those services, that would be a disaster.

Today the Prime Minister prioritised keeping the right flank of her party happy over setting out clear and coherent principles for a stronger Britain outside the EU.

Any meaningful trade deal with the EU — especially one that involves a customs union — will involve conformity to EU rules and regulations. Thanks to geography, history and culture we will be tied to Europe and the EU regardless of what deal we sign. The real question is what is the government willing to protect.

It’s clearer than ever after today’s speech that there’s far more at stake in the weeks and months ahead than just our membership of the EU. So much of what our union cherishes is on the line.

That’s why these negotiations cannot happen only in the corridors or Whitehall and Brussels and must not be the preserve of a secretive government cabal. They must take place in public, with full transparency, open to consultation with unions and others and crucially, they must have the consent of parliament.

Let anyone who dares come for our rights at work make and lose their case in public view, rather than cutting working people adrift in shadowy meeting rooms.

Now is a time for clarity, honesty and openness — all of which are necessary if the government is to receive the consent of the British people for its negotiations.

So far, all three have been sorely lacking.

Our priorities

For our part, UNISON is clear about what we sort of Brexit we want. We want to see employment rights protected in full, enshrined in primary legislation so that they can only be changed by a vote of parliament. And we want to see a Brexit with provision for investment in quality jobs, the protection of living standards and funding for quality public services.

We want to see a fair deal for public services at the core of any new trade deal with the EU and other major economies, rather than selling the NHS down the river with a rehashed TTIP.

And we want to see the right to remain for EU nationals as a starting point in negotiations with the rest of Europe. The alternative — which Theresa May’s government has failed to rule out — is the lives of millions of people, including vital public servants, being used as pawns in those negotiations.

A negotiation that fulfils these criteria shouldn’t be too difficult to achieve. No-one voted to leave the EU to weaken their rights at work. Few want to tear apart the families of those who have made their lives here. And everyone would, I hope, want to see a thriving British economy with well-funded public services in the years ahead.

UNISON will be working towards a fair deal for public services and those who provide them. It remains to be seen whether Theresa May and her ministers will be doing the same.

Dave Prentis is the General Secretary of UNISON

See: Theresa May should guarantee the residency rights of EU citizens. It’s the smart thing to do.

See: Theresa May’s ‘clean Brexit’ would hurt working people, says TUC

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

3 Responses to “If the Brexiteers are coming for our workers’ rights, they’d better do it out in the open”

  1. Chester Draws

    Any meaningful trade deal with the EU — especially one that involves a customs union

    LFF really struggles with the concept of “Leave” doesn’t it?

    There will be no “customs union” for two reasons 1) that isn’t really exiting, and 2) being in the EU customs union means not being in ones, and other ones are, frankly, better offers at the moment.

    There is no reason to link EU membership with workers’ rights, other to than to slag Brexit. The two are unrelated. Worker’s rights in France and Germany are already different from those in Britain, despite the EU “guaranteeing” provisions. The EU doesn’t set minimum wages, hours, holidays, sick leave, holiday pay etc anyway. Leaving the EU may give British workers better rights for all you know (some would argue that the protection from low wage immigrants being one of them).

    They [the negotiations] must take place in public, with full transparency,

    Full transparency is neither possible nor desirable, as it prevents people making provisional offers in confidence. It prevents working papers that offer alternatives being discussed without giving away your hand to the other side. It’s a ridiculous demand.

    We get that you don’t like the Tories, but it’s not like Labour ever had full transparency with any of its international negotiations, and it won’t want to be penned to that when it returns to power.

    How about asking the EU to be transparent first? One of the biggest objections to Brussels is the opaqueness of its workings. We’re told the UK must be transparent, and also not leave the least transparent government in the Western world? It smells of rank hypocrisy.

  2. Mike Stallard

    Mrs May’s speech was catastrophic.
    Article 50 lays down a time limit for negotiations (where UK is not present) at 2 years. There is absolutely no chance that this time limit will happen.
    Mrs May wants a special deal with 27 totally different countries each with their own agendas – and elections – each of which does not put Brexit at the top of their to do list.
    The “Single Market” which she spurns is a unit. You are either in or out. It is like fortress Europe. You cannot be half in and half out. At the end of 2 years, it is highly likely that we will find ourselves shut completely out of Europe. Businesses will go bust. With our massive £2 trillion debt, too, the government could well go belly up. Workers will be back in the 1930s.
    We need some action from Labour now – not the sort of NUS mealy mouthed stuff either!

  3. Heart Unions: Let's recognise our movement's successes as well as its challenges | Left Foot Forward

    […] right now many of those victories — hard won by unions — are under threat as a result of Brexit and the government’s unwillingness to commit to their protection. Theresa May has stated that the […]

Comments are closed.