Article 50: MPs must vote says Supreme Court in defeat for May

Judges say only parliament can trigger Brexit


MPs must vote on Article 50 to take Britain out of the EU, the Supreme Court has ruled, in a defeat for Theresa May’s government which argued it had the power to do so alone.

Judges today dismissed Brexit Secretary David Davis’s appeal of a High Court ruling in November, which said only parliament has the power to trigger Article 50.

Lord Neuberger said his fellow judges ruled eight to three that

“an Act of Parliament is required to authorise ministers to give Notice of the decision of the UK to withdraw from the European Union.”

You can read the full judgement here.

Gina Miller, who brought the original case, welcomed the decision. Speaking outside the court, she said ‘This case was about the legal process, not politics’. She added:

“No government can expect to be unanswerable or unchallenged. Parliament alone is sovereign.

This ruling today means MPs we have elected will rightfully have the opportunity to bring their invaluable experience and expertise to bear in helping the government select the best course in the forthcoming Brexit negotiations.”

Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn, responding to the decision, said:

“Labour will seek to amend the Article 50 Bill to prevent the Conservatives using Brexit to turn Britain into a bargain basement tax haven off the coast of Europe.”

He added Labour wanted ‘full, tariff-free access to the single market’, workers’ rights and environmental protections, and is ‘demanding’ a government plan which is accountable to parliament.

TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady, responding to the decision, said:

“Before voting to trigger Article 50, MPs must demand a clear plan from Theresa May on how she will protect working people from paying the price for Brexit, and make sure their workplace rights do not fall behind those in the EU.”

Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said his party would vote against Article 50 without a referendum on the Brexit deal. He said:

“I welcome today’s judgement. But this court case was never about legal arguments, it was about giving the people a voice, a say, in what happens next.

This Tory Brexit government are keen to laud the democratic process when it suits them, but will not give the people a voice over the final deal. They seem happy to start with democracy and end in a stitch up.”

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

3 Responses to “Article 50: MPs must vote says Supreme Court in defeat for May”

  1. Alma

    Totally agree! What is the next move?

  2. Jimmy Glesga

    Disagree, the remainers do not accept democracy. The judges used the argument of past custom and practice to allow time for the remainers to come up with another excuse.

  3. ted francis

    Jimmy you’re reasoning ignores the very principle upon which one of the salient reasons for the desired Amendment to the Law which brought the 1973 Treaty into being i.e.; that the UK should have its right to the absolute sovereignty of its own law-making PARLIAMENT restored has it has done for centuries.
    That is “Parliament” not “Government”. It is Parliament, representing all the people of the UK, that debates and passes or amends the laws that govern us, not the Government.
    A majority of the people who voted in the Referendum required that we simply withdraw from the Treaty (the majority of “those that voted”, not “the people of the UK” incidentally) without being given the terms upon which that withdrawal is activated. Now it is for Parliament on behalf of, not only this generation but for generations to come, to determine the terms of the withdrawal from the Treaty.
    It has nothing to do with changing the result of Referendum neither does it have anything to do with “custom and practice” or “democracy”, it is only about LAW!
    No one is above the Law, Jimmy, not Prime Ministers not cabinet members, not political parties. And it is Judges who decide what actions do or do not fall within the Law.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.