Jeremy Corbyn has inspired change in Labour, now Smith should be trusted to carry it forwards
I am a little bit left wing — a trade unionist since I started working and a Labour Party Member for about 17 years.
I voted for Jeremy Corbyn last year and I am one of the small group who voted for Diane Abbott in the previous leadership election. I set up and chaired a very active Momentum branch in Medway.
I am also supporting Owen Smith in his leadership campaign.
Over the last ten months, I became increasingly frustrated with the leadership of the Labour Party. I hear the policies put out by John McDonnell and Jeremy Corbyn and I wholeheartedly support them. I cheer the support and rejuvenation they have brought to our party.
But what I see in practice is different. I see a leader confined by an inability to compromise and to reach out to make alliances — the basis of pragmatic politics.
In Wales, Labour maintained its control of the National Assembly this year only by building an alliance with the Lib Dems’ single AM. That alliance saw off an unlikely collaboration between Plaid Cymru and UKIP.
Alliances in politics matter and create success. Yet, while Carwyn Jones is left to negotiate the future of Port Talbot Steelworks with Theresa May, we are left with a party leadership in Westminster which cannot bridge alliances within our own party.
The operation of the current leadership permeates throughout the Momentum movement. Nationally, the failure to communicate and engage on supported policy is chronic.
Organisers hand out policy and approaches as a done deal with little, if any, consultation to committees, let alone members. Even the national committee was scarcely consulted on the instant selection of Rhea Wolfson as an NEC candidate after Ken Livingstone fell from grace.
Momentum, like the Corbyn leadership, is a body on the brink of self destruction; unable to listen, blindly pushing out ideology while local groups flounder unsupported, and just a few unpopular decisions away from collapse.
My father passed away at the end of May. In true Welsh style, the community turned out and visited my mother and me. In the time spent over cups of tea and memories, conversation often drifted to politics and the message that came out from old family friends was ‘you’ve got to get rid of that Jeremy Corbyn’.
These were solid Labour voters. People who actually were part of the communities that came together and organised during the Miners Strikes. Traditional, old fashioned socialists.
They understand the need for a strong socialist party in government, but have no confidence in Corbyn’s Labour.
My confidence, which was waning, was knocked. At work, in a heavily unionised environment, people told me they had always voted Labour but had strong doubts now.
The final straw came after EDF finally made a decision to proceed with the Hinkley Point C project, which I have worked on for five years as a Branch Councillor with Prospect.
As a union, we have worked solidly with our colleagues in Unite, GMB and UCATT to support this project, which represents an £11 billion investment in the UK business economy, which will create over 25,000 UK jobs. It will produce seven per cent of the UK’s power needs with a vastly reduced carbon footprint, avoiding 90 million tonnes of CO2 production annually and is predicted to generate three per cent of the UK’s entire corporation tax when in production.
The project was initially conceived under a Labour government and has been supported by Labour, but team Corbyn’s response was derogatory and facile.
Tories have just put up the cost of your electricity by giving a blank cheque to EDF for a power station that doesn’t work
— Jeremy Corbyn MP (@jeremycorbyn) July 28, 2016
This tweet mocked the work of hundreds of nuclear engineers who have worked doggedly for years devising design solutions to combat the safety concerns raised by Fukushima. There was no advised policy, there was no coherent response and there was no support for the work of the unions.
I have felt immense relief in leaving the Corbyn camp and joining with Smith. We need a strong, organised Labour Party and he is offering that.
Owen, as a committed, soft left politician can relate to and embrace the needs of a Labour movement that has cried out for change. He has seen how the membership feels and responded. He is offering policies that sit firmly on the left but the real difference is in what he personally offers.
His policy is offered in a way that works within the constraints of our political system. It’s offered with the support of the majority of MPs who desperately want to represent the entirety of the Labour movement and make a difference to people’s lives.
Different leaders have different strengths. Many agree that Winston Churchill was a good leader in wartime but an abysmal peacetime prime minister.
Corbyn has been an inspirational force for change, but now we need to continue that change by adopting a leader who can hear the message and move the party onward to electoral success. To do that, we all need to admit and put aside our differences and work together.
We need to to build on the inspiration generated by Corbyn, by entrusting the party to the safe hands of Smith.
Rachel Garrick is vice chair of Rochester & Strood Labour Party and a trade unionist with Prospect.
See also: Diane Abbott: Jeremy Corbyn’s vision can win a general election
46 Responses to “I founded a Momentum branch – but will be supporting Owen Smith”
Joe Baxter
Thank you LFF for making me aware of this person’s decision to campaign for Smith, I don’t know where else I might have heard about this otherwise.
David Hamilton
Interesting and compelling reasons why someone would change their minds on who to support in the leadership election.
The main issue with Corbyn is clear – he could not lead his way out of a paper bag, but then neither can Mcdonnell or Abbot.
Smith clearly knows how to approach leadership and should in my opinion be given the chance.
What is really begging to scare me is not the terms of the debate, nor the abuse or planned support at the hustings, but the absolute certainty of many of Corbyn’s supporters that he and only he can take this forward. That Corbyn and only Corbyn is an honest politician. If you believe this then fine, I am not going to produce the standard abusive comments. I would just ask yourself just one question. What has, apart from becoming leader and getting people to join the party, Corbyn achieved between 1983 and 2015. Thats 32 years, 13 of which Labour was in power. What did he achieve?
Glen Adams
Margret Thatcher was not responsible for Thatersm. Far left and militant activists were.
Globalised industry isn’t responsible for global warming. Far left and militant activists are.
Reality isn’t black or white. It’s grey.
If Corbyn supporters want the government opposition to be the SNP and then UKIP, carry on not thinking.
Owen Smith is a sharp thinker and an effective leader.
Don’t be selfish like Corbyn and crash it all to dust, be smart like Owen Smith, be True Labour.
Dennis lane
The point on the miners strike is lost on me,Ask were Owen was and what did he do for the miners,
Jeremy was here there and everywhere supporting the miners when Kinnock was knocking the miners, Kinnock Mandleson Blair Ed Milliband are supporting OWEN,enough said.
Tom Gabriel
@Catherine Love-Madden
Owen Smith has actually never supported fracking. He voted in the minority for explicitly requiring environmental permits for fracking and he voted against the 2015 Onshore Hydraulic Fracturing Regulations because they were insufficient. Corbyn did exactly the same but papers such as the Sun characterize Smith’s latter vote as him being ‘against greater restrictions on fracking to extract shale gas in national parks, the Broads, areas of outstanding natural beauty and so on’. This is simply a lie by the right wing press and so it is sad to see Corbyn supporters, who so readily critique media bias, repeating it.
As for your claim that Smith’s past support for ‘direct payments to pay for private treatments’ is necessarily ‘a step towards the privatisation of the NHS’, this is simply not true. Firstly, the NHS has always made direct payments to the private sector as part of the provision of its services, but even if you specifically mean Smith’s past support of Labour’s previous policy of using some NHS funds for the likes of private healthcare hip operations, I’d simply ask: if that is proposed alongside Labour’s doubling in NHS spending, why is that necessarily wrong? Of course, you might argue that there is a danger of it becoming a slippery slope to privatisation by the Tories, and Smith has voiced sympathy with that view, but it is perfectly moral to give temporary payment to private providers for certain over-subscribed NHS services, especially when people like my Nan had to wait inhumane periods of time on NHS hip operation waiting lists, meaning that even as an NHS user and life-long tax payer who’d worked for the NHS, she eventually had to stump up the money for a private operation herself. Frankly, I think that is wrong and you should be careful not to just throw people like her under the bus of your ideological agenda.
The same, sadly, is true of your flat out denial that Corbyn is unelectable. Corbyn has the worst personal ratings of any Labour leader, he has averaged 11% worse in the polls against the Tories than even Ed Miliband managed, Corbyn has led the only opposition to have lost seats since the 1980s, and he has only been ahead of the Tories (by the smallest of margins) in just 3 anomalous polls of the 88 conducted so far, which is unprecedented for an opposition party given the artificial boost they get in mid-cycle polling. Simply put, a vote for Corbyn is a vote for the Conservatives to win the next election and, as a Clause IV socialist myself, I see that as a gross abdication of our party’s solemn duty to fight meaningfully for the poorest and most vulnerable in society.