Labour leadership candidates have similar records on the issues
With Owen Smith’s hat in the ring, Jeremy Corbyn has two potential challengers for Labour Party leader.
How do the three compare on the issues?
Owen Smith
Owen Smith says he would be a ‘radical and credible’ leader, and his voting record bears this out.
He has backed increasing welfare payments, including benefits for disabled people, and voted against welfare cuts (including the Bedroom Tax) and cuts to local government funds.
Smith voted with his party to abstain on the July 2015 welfare bill, but voted against the bill in its third reading.
Smith has consistently voted for gay rights (including same-sex marriage) and assisted dying for the terminally ill, and wants to see a wholly elected House of Lords.
Smith has voted against tax cuts for the wealthy and backed a higher rate of tax for top earners, while opposing higher taxes that affect lower-income earners, like VAT and alcohol.
He backed a bankers’ bonus tax and Labour’s proposed mansion tax.
Smith has also consistently voted against restrictions on trade unions.
On health and education, Smith has voted against privatisation measures, including academies, and consistently voted against having university tuition fees and against raising them to £9,000.
His votes on devolution to Wales and Scotland and to local councils are a mixed bag, and he has opposed stricter asylum and immigration rules.
On security, Smith says he opposed the Iraq war, though he wasn’t an MP when the vote was taken in 2003.
He has since voted for a no-fly zone in Libya during the Arab Spring effort to topple Gaddafi (2011), against taking action in Syria after Assad used chemical weapons (2013), for airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq (2014) and against airstrikes against ISIS in Syria (2015).
Smith said this morning he was for multilateral nuclear disarmament, but currently backs replacing Britain’s Trident submarines (a view popular with trade unions), and his votes reflect this.
He has voted for bulk retention of communication data by security services, and backed measures to prevent climate change.
Conclusion: Owen Smith’s voting record shows a commitment to a Left programme for social justice, opposing privatisation, a cautious but internationalist foreign policy, and greater equality.
Angela Eagle
Angela Eagle has promised ‘real leadership’ to bring party and country together – and lead Labour into government.
On welfare and benefits, her votes are as strong as Owen Smith’s, including on government jobs programmes for young people who are unemployed. (Like Smith, she abstained on the welfare bill in July 2015 but voted against in its third reading.)
She voted against tax cuts for top earners and voted for a higher top rate of tax, plus voted for a tax on bankers’ bonuses, and Labour’s mansion tax, while opposing higher taxes that affect lower-income earners, like VAT and alcohol.
She has consistently voted against restrictions on trade unions.
Eagle has consistently voted for gay rights, (including same-sex marriage), and assisted dying for the terminally ill, and wants to see a wholly elected House of Lords.
Like Smith, she has voted against stricter asylum and immigration laws, and for the bulk data retention, but also supported Labour’s anti-terrorism laws and plans to introduce ID cards. (Smith was not in parliament at the time.)
Eagle has opposed privatisation measures in health and education, including academies, and voted against tripling university tuition fees. However, Eagle generally voted for tuition fees.
On security, Eagle has generally voted for replacing Trident nuclear submarines, and voted with her party in support of the Iraq war in 2003.
Eagle voted against taking action in Syria after Assad used chemical weapons (2013), for airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq (2014) and for airstrikes against ISIS in Syria (2015). (She was absent for the Libya vote in 2011.)
Taken with her support for Labour’s anti-terrorism measures, this suggests a security policy based on tackling Islamist terrorism, but cautious of intervening against dictators post-Iraq.
Unlike Smith, Eagle consistently voted for ministers being able to intervene in inquests. Their records on devolution to Wales, Scotland and local councils are similar, as are votes to prevent climate change.
Conclusion: Angela Eagle’s voting record is one of a solid social democrat working for greater equality, social justice, opposing privatisation, and a security policy based on keeping Brits safe.
Jeremy Corbyn
As the incumbent, Jeremy Corbyn’s positions are already well-known, and his voting record is consistent over many years in parliament.
He consistently voted for raising welfare payments and benefits, including for disabled people, and opposed cuts to welfare spending.
Last July he was one of 48 Labour rebels who voted against the government’s welfare bill, on which the party abstained. This helped secure his election as Labour Party leader less than two months later.
Corbyn has opposed tax cuts for the wealthy and voted for higher taxes for top earners, along with opposing VAT rises. However, he voted for raising tax on alcohol in 2010.
Unlike his rivals for Labour leader, Corbyn voted against assisted dying for the terminally ill in 1997.
Like his rivals, he has voted against cuts to corporation tax, against trebling tuition fees and against privatisation measures in health and education, including academies.
Also like his rivals, he backs a wholly elected House of Lords, has opposed stricter asylum and immigration laws, has a mixed record on devolution, and has voted against curbs to trade unions.
The biggest single policy difference is on security and foreign policy. Corbyn has voted against every use of military force up for a vote in parliament, including in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and on airstrikes against ISIS. He has also voted against Labour’s anti-terrorism laws and bulk retention of data.
He leads a minority in his party on not replacing Trident nuclear submarines – a position the Labour Party NEC voted against debating at September’s party conference, before effectively backing replacement as Labour’s long-standing position.
Conclusion: Jeremy Corbyn’s voting record shows consistency over many years on Labour’s hard-Left, with a commitment to greater equality, social justice, opposing privatisation, and a non-interventionist foreign policy, with curbs to anti-terror laws and no nuclear deterrent.
Obviously, Labour voters will consider much besides voting records when choosing a new party leader.
But it’s worth noting that on the issues, there is little space between the three candidates on domestic policy. All three are certainly to the Left of Ed Miliband.
In other words, there are no ‘Blairites’ currently in the race.
On foreign affairs, Corbyn is an outlier among MPs, with stances popular with sections of the party. But again, there are no ‘hawks’ or ‘neo-cons’ in sight – at least based on the evidence.
UPDATE: This piece has been amended to say both Smith and Eagle voted against the Welfare Bill in its third reading.
Adam Barnett is staff writer for Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter @AdamBarnett13
See: Jeremy Corbyn lacks support from union members, says YouGov poll
23 Responses to “Owen Smith, Angela Eagle and Jeremy Corbyn – what’s the difference?”
Bob
Just a note: they *all* voted against the Tory welfare bill at the important stage, the third reading. That is where the bill passes or falls, to keep saying only Corbyn voted against is wrong and implies blind and wilful prejudice.
Bob
, to keep saying only Corbyn voted against is wrong and implies blind and wilful prejudice.
Jim Goode
Ths article seems to be a summary of the information on http://www.theyworkforyou.com .
The problem with that it, in Smith’s case, the only data you have is votes he made while in opposition to the coalition and current government.
In our binary political system, it is rare for Opposition MPs to vote with the government of the time, and given how right wing those governments have been, it would be a really shock were any Labour MP to vote with them.
Nancy
Your summation of Owen Smith is seriously lacking. Forgot to mention he went to school for History and French which somehow qualified him to work as a radio producer for the BBC for ten years, followed by a career as a lobbyist for Pfizer, who had previously been funding the right-wing pressure group Progress, then moved on to fund his first election in Wales. Interestingly Pfizer has been putting pressure on UK government to pay their exorbitant costs for new cancer medication which has been shown to be quite effective in saving lives but at a cost of strangling the NHS, usually these drugs are offered at a discount, Pfizer instead withheld the drug for over three years until the government agreed to pay very recently. Also you should have considered the points made by Tony above as they show his rhetoric is not consistent. To say now he is strongly against the Iraq war, but at the time to say he supported it goes to show his own inconsistencies and how he just acts in the flavour of the popular rhetoric of the month.
He also hasn’t shown a very ‘left’ approach to working women: According to the book The Greasy Poll: Diary of a controversial election by Mike Parker, prior to their debate, he told Leanne Wood while on camera that she was only on Question Time to fill the needed female quota.
Angela is also far from ‘Left’ wing and has shown with her voting record that her actions and words do not meet. Not sure how you missed that in your analysis, it’s pretty obvious.
You should definitely not be so blaze about brushing over their thoughts on privatisation either given it is privatisation more than anything that separates the Neoliberals from the true Left. Cameron has made it very clear by his repeated attacks on the Labour party and Corbyn (simply because he is the current leader, not because he had anything to do wiht it) that they cannot criticise Tories for privatisation as they were the ones who started it. Opening the door to privatisation, especially in health and education leaves it vulnerable to complete disintegration when the Tories are in power. It didn’t take long to take the NHS from Blair’s PFI to it’s current state where by the World Health Organisation’s definition, the UK doesn’t actually qualify as an NHS as it became too privatised under the Health and Social Care Act of 2012 http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/terrifyingly-according-to-the-world-health-organisation-definition-the-uk-no-longer-has-a-nhs-a6923126.html
Jay ginn
The differences on foreign policy are significant for the welfare of people in many countries and also have large financial implications. hence Corbyns stand against Trident replacement and disastrous wars , that have killed and injured so many while devastating middle eastern infrastructure and economic position, is not a minor issue. Let’s not forget , too, that besides the many uk servicemen and women killed , even more suffered life changing injuries and will require much surgery and rehab care for the rest of their lives.
I take issue with the writers bland assumption that Assad used chemical weapons. He may or may not have done this, we don’t have the necessary evidence and he should not swallow uncritically the politicians assertions, remembering similar assertions about WMD in Iraq.