Radical politicians must respond to Britain’s cry of pain

The Brexiters are exploiting people's anger but offering no solutions


The faux rebellion narrative of the Brexiteers has succeeded.

They have managed to persuade a majority of the British people to support them against their own interests and the advice of every breathing expert.

Tory Brexiteers managed to exploit the hostility felt towards politicians – something they themselves have engendered – and presented voting Leave as an act of rebellion.

During the campaign I was reminded of Yeats’s poem The Second Coming when he says that ‘the best lack all conviction, while the worst; Are full of passionate intensity’.

Although the content of the arguments of those arguing for a withdrawal from our own continent was nonsense and their statistics largely bogus, their passion for their cause was compelling.

They energised people’s disgruntlement with globalisation and exhaustion with austerity and channeled it into a destructive but powerful movement for change.

As radical politicians our role now is to respond to the cry of pain that drove our country to make what I consider a disastrous decision and use its energy to revitalise both our democracy and the progressive politics that we believe in.

The first vital step is to change our electoral system so that all votes count.

First past the post forces us into a choice between two parties who compete to occupy the narrow centre ground and collude with each other to share power and prevent others from entering the political arena.

It is a political cartel designed to prevent radical change — voters have seen through it and are rejecting it.

First past the post also means that most votes don’t count.

There are only around 194 marginal seats that change hands during general elections, and nearly all the attention is on these marginals and the swing voters in them. For those in the remaining 456 constituencies with safe seats, their vote really has no bearing on the result.

In a referendum, by contrast, every vote is equal.

I think it may have been the novelty of their vote counting that confused the ‘Regrexiteers’; they regarded their little cross as a gesture and then were horrified when they discovered that they had changed history.

The Leave campaign were dishonest and irresponsible. Nothing could have made this clearer than the horror in their faces when they realised they had won. Now they would be expected to live up to the dishonest promises they had made.

And when the prime minister resigned the horror expanded: now they would actually have to take responsibility.

I hold no candle for Cameron but I do admire anybody who is prepared to take the weight of the country onto their shoulders and I know the difference between a charlatan and a politician. Most of those on the Leave side were the former.

So, there are a couple of things we must do.

First, we must not allow the far right to use the vote in the referendum as a domestic mandate. People on the right and the left voted for Brexit and it implies nothing in terms of domestic politics.

Secondly, we must hold the Brexit majority to their statements about sovereignty and democracy. In the context of multi-party politics it is no longer democratically acceptable to have a choice between two parties who will exercise sole power.

This is like having a choice between two mobile phone companies who collude to limit your choices and have no incentive to offer a better service.

First past the post is holding our country back and if we the people really want to take control we must demand a fair electoral system.

The most famous phrase from Yeats’s poem is also particularly relevant to our continent at this time:

Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.

While I eschew the politics of fear, we do need to recognise that this is a critical time for our continent.

We cannot use the Channel as a barrier against the rise of fascism in continental Europe any more than we can imagine that the City of London provides a buffer against crisis in the Eurozone.

We are making preparations to leave the EU and our political influence inside its institutions is already diminished to almost nothing.

But in parallel with revitalising our democracy at home we must continue to work with progressive forces across our continent to maintain stability, democracy and peace across Europe.

Molly Scott Cato is Green MEP for the South West of England and a former Professor of Strategy and Sustainability at the University of Roehampton. Follow her on Twitter @MollyMEP

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

12 Responses to “Radical politicians must respond to Britain’s cry of pain”

  1. Carey

    Thank you Molly Scott Cato. I agree with a lot of what you say, in terms of the rebellion and anti establishment nature of the vote. Whilst I am sickened by the seemingly corporatist nature of the EU, and was appalled at its treatment of Greece for example, I don’t agree that we have left corporatist economics by leaving the EU, far from it. I do believe that we benefited from being part of it – though it needs to be much more democratic – we have to understand that the British Gvt held great influence in the EU, and are responsible for much of what has happened to Britain whilst we were members. Anyone who hasn’t seen EU Law expert Prof Michael Duggan’s explanation of Britain’s position in the EU – in fact and in Law – maybe would like to see this. https://www.facebook.com/UniversityofLiverpool/videos/1293361974024537/ The next 10 years of re formulating our Laws, trade agreements etc etc will now be crucial, and I fear, very difficult.

  2. Chris Brody

    We need a progressive alliance. Perhaps we could call it Progessive Left for a United Kingdom (PLUK)?

  3. Digby Strong

    I think it’s too late for recriminations against those who democratically won.
    However, we can take some lessons as learnt, and try not to repeat some of the bad political practice, which has left me embarrassed about my country.
    The part of the electorate who were disillusioned by a party-political system, which they thought had abandoned them, are now even more sick about the empty promises made to them about the NHS and immigration.
    We need a foundation for the framework of where we go from here. Let’s start with disassociating ourselves from the rhetoric of populist bandwagons, and require politicians to give the FACTs, and to clearly distinguish these from opinions, goals and wish-lists.

  4. Niki Underhill

    Read the Guardian article on the link address and wrote to your MP to try to stop Brexit being triggered


  5. Five key lessons from this EU vote about referendums | Left Foot Forward

    […] See: Radical politicians must respond to Britain’s cry of pain […]

Comments are closed.