Experts have called for politicians to reject Draft Wales Bill
A new independent report has urged politicians in Cardiff Bay and Westminster to reject proposals for further devolution to Wales.
The Draft Wales Bill seeks to implement the proposals contained within the St David’s Day Agreement outlining a series of new powers to be devolved to the Welsh government and Assembly in policy areas such as energy, transport, the environment and elections.
It included proposals for a new ‘reserved powers model’ – in line with the model in Scotland – which would enable Wales to make policy and law in all areas except those specifically reserved for Westminster.
But a report published today by the Wales Governance Centre at Cardiff University and the Constitution Unit at University College London has argued that the draft Bill does not do what was promised.
The independent review group which produced the report has noted:
- Whilst the ‘reserved powers’ approach offers many benefits to Wales and to the UK as a whole if done properly, this is not achieved within the Draft Wales Bill. “Done badly, the reserved powers approach will lead to another short-lived arrangement that works poorly.”
- “To be lasting and effective, a new Wales Act needs to be underpinned by clear principles that ensure a coherent and consistent devolution package for Wales. As that is not the case, it is unsurprising that the Bill has attracted little support, even in the short time available for consideration”.
- “The list of reservations in the draft Bill reflects the lack of coherent approach by Whitehall. The overall package of reservations is highly complex, and some of the proposed reservations are designed to protect Whitehall departmental interests rather than deliver a coherent and consistent set of devolved powers. Their complexity will inhibit policy making and undermine the robustness of the settlement.”
- “The reliance on ‘necessity’ tests for legislation affecting private or criminal law is unduly onerous. These tests add complexity and uncertainty, and will provoke legal challenge with decisions on whether Welsh legislation is necessary taken by judges rather than elected representatives.”
- “There are complex questions about the legal relationship between England and Wales arising from the powers necessary to make ‘reserved powers’ work effectively. A distinct Welsh legal jurisdiction is one answer to these issues. A ‘rules-based’ approach to managing legal differences is another.”
Commenting on the difficulties with the Bill, Professor Richard Rawlings of University College London, who helped draft the report, said:
“Wales has experienced three deeply problematic devolution settlements since 1999. There was genuine hope that the all-party agreement that Wales should move to a ‘reserved powers’ model of devolution heralded the beginning of a process that would lead to Welsh devolution being placed on a sustainable constitutional basis.
“The Draft Wales Bill does not do what was promised. All too often, the secretary of state’s fine policy objectives of a stronger, clearer, fairer and more robust devolution settlement are frustrated by provision that is constricting, clunky, inequitable and constitutionally short-sighted.
“At the heart of the difficulty is the triple squeeze on the devolved institutions of intrusive general restriction, over-occupation of legislative space, and blurry forms of executive veto. It does not have to be like this.”
The report points to the need for fundamental changes to the proposed legislation and sets out a series of proposals for reconstructing the legislation in order to deliver a properly constituted reserved powers model of devolution for Wales.
The report explains how alternative approaches to the legislation, based on territorial rules or a distinct but not separate jurisdiction for Wales, offer ways of providing the space to allow the National Assembly to legislate effectively
Commenting on the next steps for the Draft Wales Bill, Professor Richard Wyn Jones of the Wales Governance Centre said:
“We believe that the legislative process around the Draft Wales Bill should be paused for these matters to be fully examined by all stakeholders including the Welsh government, Wales Office and the Ministry of Justice.”
Ed Jacobs is a contributing editor at Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
3 Responses to “Welsh devolution hits a stumbling block”
Bradley B.
A federal system with same devolved powers and institutions for all constituent parts would be best so let’s not even think about it. Rather let us bury ourselves in false history and redundant complexity and call it ”being British.”
CGR
A fully federal solution is needed that gives equal powers to Wales, NI, Scotland and England, with a federal UK government dealling with external affairs, security and financial management.
Richard MacKinnon
Asymmetric devolution as we have in the UK at present is constitutional vandalism. It has resulted in constant friction between parent parliament and devolved administrations as each vie for more powers. It is an unstable model of government.
There are no other rational alternatives other than full UK federalism or a single UK parliament (or independence from rUK). Devolution was an ill thought out unionist solution to Scottish nationalism. If full UK federalism is unachievable the recent devolutionary arrangements should be deconstructed.