Poorest in Scotland face “double whammy”, argues think tank

The poorest families in Scotland face the prospect of being more than £800 a year worse off as a result of the Chancellor’s plans for spending and benefits.


The poorest families in Scotland face the prospect of being more than £800 a year worse off as a result of the Chancellor’s plans for spending and benefits.

As the Scottish Government’s Finance Secretary, John Swinney, prepares to deliver his budget plans tomorrow, the analysis by IPPR Scotland has assessed the cumulative impact on Scotland of announcements made in the Summer Budget and the autumn statement last month.

It finds that:

  • £500 million would be cut from those on benefits by 2020 which would require the equivalent of a 1p rise in income tax by Holyrood to be able to reverse this;
  • The poorest households could lose £580 a year, while those who have their benefits cut will be on average more than £800 a year worse off by 2020;
  • The bottom 60% of households are likely to lose out, while the richest third are set to gain from the Government’s plans;
  • Unprotected Government departments in Scotland, including local government and justice, face the prospect of seeing their budgets fall by 2.9% in 2016-17. By 2020, it warns, spending on these departments could be cut by 10.7%.

Commenting on the findings, Russell Gunson, director of IPPR Scotland, said:

“The poorest households in Scotland are facing a double whammy of cuts to benefits and potential cuts to public services in Scotland.

“By 2020, many thousands of the poorest households in Scotland will see their incomes drop by hundreds of pounds each year, while the richest households in Scotland will benefit through tax cuts.”

He continued:

“At the same time, the UK Government’s spending decisions will see significant cuts to spending on public services in Scotland.

“Our calculations show that, for Scotland, departments outside of health, affordable housing and childcare could see cuts of over a tenth, leaving a shortfall of around £1.5 billion per year by 2020. From April next year, these non-protected departments could be facing cuts of over £400 million in real-terms.”

The findings come as the Scottish Commission on Local Tax Reform, established jointly by the Scottish Government and the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA) has called for an end to the unfair council tax system.

Whilst the report does not recommend any one particular replacement, it does outline three potential solutions aimed at informing next year’s elections to Holyrood which would bring in a similar amount of money to the £2 billion currently collecting in council tax. These are:

  • a replacement property tax, based on the value of land and buildings;
  • a land value tax, based on the value of land only; and
  • a local income tax which would raise revenue based on a householder’s taxable income

The report concludes:

“The predominant view of the Commission is that Local Government’s tax base should, if it could be proved feasible, be broadened to include income. Income is widely perceived to be a fairer basis on which to levy a tax, although a locally variable income tax presents substantial administrative challenges.”

The Commission’s findings come as the Finance Secretary looks set to freeze council tax for the ninth year in a row.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

12 Responses to “Poorest in Scotland face “double whammy”, argues think tank”

  1. Rick

    These are decisions for the Scottish assembly

  2. Alasdair Macdonald

    What is Rick actually saying? The Scottish Parliament does have some powers in these areas, but, until the financial settlement of the Scotland Act are worked out, any discussion is hypothetical. Of course, discussion should explore these matters both in the public domain and within government, so that the ramifications of proposals can be explored.a major part of the problem is the vacuity of Scottish Labour and the cavilling and trivial opposition in Paliament. There are some figures such as Hugh Henry MSP, who have gravitas and are prepared to discuss and transcend party politics to address the very specific issues relating to the poorest members of our society.

  3. Intolerant_Liberal

    It’s obvious that very few people in politics care about the poverty and pauperisation of the poorest people in the British isles as a whole. They have been abandoned. Politics is only really concerned with the affluent and the wealthy, which is not surprising as the majority of politicians in all parties tend to come from affluent and even wealthy backgrounds. Why should they care? Most of them have never lived for a moment in the real world of low paid jobs, financial struggles and the disappointments that many of us are party to. We need more politicians from ordinary backgrounds who have lived in the real world, outside Planet Politics and the concerns of the metropolitan political elites in London. Until that changes, and there is a massive resistance to that, our democracy is in name only.
    And, of course, it’s only the underclass of Scotland, hey, and who cares about them, being so far from London????

  4. Alasdair Macdonald

    There is a huge ‘underclass’ in London, too, and who, in the Government, Whitehall or, indeed, a significant chunk of the PLP, cares about them ….. or about the growing number of people from Muckle Flugga to the Scilly Isles, from Lowestoft Ness to Derry, who are getting poorer.
    Remember Keats’ poem: ‘Rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number …. We are many, they are few”? I heard that first in a speech by Michael Foot, at a time when Labour actually believed in the redistribution of wealth and power, at the time when “Lord”! Darling was pretending to be a leftie.


    Only 1p in the pound tax rise in Scotland to overcome the cuts. Go on Tartan Tories do it. You talk about austerity anf food banks now do somethingvyou have the powers.

Comments are closed.