Daily Express is keen to believe his boast, but let's think this through
The Daily Express gleefully reports today that a ‘jobless layabout ‘ has boasted of spending £10,000 of benefits on prostitutes.
Out-of-work builder Carl Robinson, 26, said:
“I will get a job at some point but at the moment I’m enjoying myself and paying for sex. I have spent over £10k of benefits on hookers. It is a lot but it is money well spent.”
A charming boast to make. But the Express seems uninterested in the important question of whether it’s actually true.
The Department for Work and Pensions was no help, bleating: “After looking through their system for ‘Carl Robinson’, without any key identifying details, they have ascertained that they are unable to say definitively if he is claiming.”
Thank heavens that has been ascertained. But why were they not provided with any other ‘identifying details’? If the Express can speak to Robinson and take his photo, why can’t they ask for other details? Very curious.
Regardless, is Mr Robinson’s claim true?
Working with the story’s sketchy information, MediaWatch can surmise the following:
The only benefits Robinson is said to be receiving is £170 a fortnight of Jobseekers’ Allowance (JSA). He is said to have started claiming and using the money for prostitutes three years ago.
Assuming he received this benefit all year for three years, this would amount to £4,080 a year and £12,240 in total.
For his claim to be true, he would have to have spent £10,000 out of this £12,000, or 83 per cent of his money, on prostitutes.
This would leave him with £2,000 for food, travel and so on, for three years.
Given that this is the case – and again, relying on the information in the Express story – we echo David Hume in asking:
Which is more likely? That Carl Robinson survived on £2,000 for three years while spending the other 83 percent of his benefits on prostitutes?
Or is it more likely he made it up? (or is massaging the truth, or the story has left out some key information)
Time will tell. We expect a correction or clarification within the week.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
DONATE to support MediaWatch here.
Read more:
Express complains about bilingual children, as language stands in for race
Daily Express says sorry for false ‘half of Muslims support ISIS’ story
Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
8 Responses to “Did this man really spend £10k of benefits on prostitutes? We’re sceptical”
Selohesra
Another possibility would be that he did a bit of cash in hand work whilst claiming these benefits meaning he would not have to survive on £2K for three years
GTE
So how can Lord coke spend 400 quid on hookers plus extra for coke, when his expenses are only 300 quid?
Answer he has other sources of money.
Clive
JSA is only £72 a week. £53 for those 25 years of age or less. I should know because I claim it. Where does the Daily Express (or the young man) get £170 a week? I wish!
Giles Farthing
if there is anyone out there who needs to get laid, i’d say it was Adam
Cole
Or that he’s a boastful idiot and that the story is a lot of nonsense.