From regressive tax to shrinking the state, the Times outflanks George Osborne on the right
Two examples in today’s Times belie the common impression of it being among the more balanced UK papers.
The first, on page 2, warns that ‘high earners face big hit’ if chancellor Osborne merges income tax and national insurance.
It quotes an investment firm saying those earning more than £47,500 (£21,000 more than the national average) would pay an extra £230 in tax every year.
However, the story notes that
“…those earning less than this amount would benefit. Someone earning £20,000 a year would be more than £500 better off.“
Thus the Times has chosen to criticise a government proposal from the perspective of it being too progressive (in tax terms).
The second example is the paper’s editorial column, headlined ‘A Streamlined State’. It argues George Osborne is too timid about cuts to government departments and calls for an explicit and ideological commitment to slim the size of the state:
“Mr Osborne calls his protected spending choices a matter of political priorities. That is bloodless language. It would be good to know that these cuts reflected a broader political philosophy as well, with the goal of a more efficient, more responsive state that consumes less of the nation’s income.
To achieve this the chancellor will ultimately have to target waste inside his ringfences, not just outside. He would find plenty of fat to cut.”
More efficient government would be welcome, but in business-speak (a language in which the Times is fluent) ‘efficiency’ is code for cuts to resources and sacking staff.
The Times is urging government cuts to departments even the slash-happy chancellor has ‘ring-fenced’, and wants public justifications of this in the name of a ‘streamlined’ (more business-speak) state.
In both these pieces, the supposedly balanced Times – formerly the newspaper of record – puts itself to the right of the Conservative government.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
Read more:
French ferry workers lose their jobs… but the Times revels in French property market
The Times’s Melanie Phillips says calling gender pay gap a ‘scandal’ is sexist
Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
12 Responses to “Murdoch’s ‘balanced’ Times is more right-wing than the Tories”
BlueApesRevolt
Murdoch likes to encourage the use of words such as “balanced “to describe his propaganda outlets ..it is well known that Fox News in the USA has long used the slogan “fair and balanced”.Murdoch does not do balanced and he despises fairness .The Times and Sunday Times have always had a centre right bias but at least there were some quality in depth and yes “balanced “pieces in the Times before Murdoch took over the titles.Murdoch has a political agenda and uses his papers to zealously impose that agenda ..that would be okay if the vast majority of national news titles weren’t also so zealously hard right in their outlook.Of course the likes of the (very shallow ) Guido Fawkes are ok with this as it fits with their Thatcherite worldview.For genuine democrats however the slanted and narrow perspective of (the vast majority of ) the UK press (and associated websites )is very troubling .
John Cooper
Murdochs propaganda balancing act we do not want to become like the USA with there mind of graft!