Five reasons not to trust George Osborne with Britain’s national treasures

Worried about privatisation? What to watch out for in Wednesday's budget

 

On Wednesday it’s thechancellor’s ’emergency budget’.

We don’t know exactly what he’s planning. But we do know he seems to be in a hurry to sell off our public services to the private sector as quickly as possible.

That’s why we’ve launched our Top Trumps campaign to draw attention to some of the great public assets that we believe are on Osborne’s hit list. If it has a proud history of success, provides a vital service and makes a profit – we’ve got to keep a close eye on it. The chancellor is probably about to go in for the kill.

1) In May, Osborne announced that he would be selling off £23 billion of our public assets at a CBI dinner. The government is creating a new company to streamline the privatisation process: UK Government Investments (UKGI). UKGI brings together UK Financial Investments (which includes government shares in Lloyds and RBS) with the shareholder executive. The Shareholder Executive is in charge of a portfolio of government owned or part owned businesses, including the Met Office, Ordnance Survey and the Royal Mint, amongst many others. We don’t know for sure whether all or just some of these assets are up for grabs.

2) Under the coalition government, the Liberal Democrats held back some of George Osborne’s plans to sell off public assets. Vince Cable vetoed plans to privatise Channel 4, the Land Registry and the rest of the student loan book.

3) Mark Russell, the head of the Shareholder Executive, is on the record as saying ‘only one or two companies’ owned by the government will never be privatised and that the government is looking at wholly or partly-privatising Companies House, the Land Registry, the Met Office and Ordnance Survey over the lifetime of this parliament.

“Mr Russell makes clear that, unless there is a policy reason for government to own a business, it should look to divest its shareholding if it can realise value for money,” the FT reported. Meanwhile, private investors are already starting to eye up the potential of our profitable public assets.

4) The chancellor has already said that he is selling off the remaining public shares in RBS, and Lloyds. Business secretary Sajid Javid recently announced plans to privatise the Green Investment Bank, and the press is now reporting that privatisation of Channel 4 is back on the table.

5) We know George Osborne won’t wait for our permission or consult us. He doesn’t seem to mind what the public thinks. This government has already sold off a whole range of our services including Eurostar, the search and rescue service, blood plasma – not to mention opening the doors for wholesale privatisation of the NHS and encouraging councils to outsource as much as possible. We know we’ll be the last to hear about our services being sold off. Did you spot George Osborne selling off 15 per cent of Royal Mail shares overnight to bankers? It’ll happen again.

When Osborne goes in for the kill on Wednesday, let’s be ready. Ready to explain why he’s wrong. Ready to fight back. Let’s tell the positive stories about public institutions working well in our hands, making a profit and doing fantastic work.

Sign the petition to stop the sell off.

Cat Hobbs is the director of We Own It. Follow her on Twitter

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

28 Responses to “Five reasons not to trust George Osborne with Britain’s national treasures”

  1. Torybushhug

    The reason many of us come to lose sympathy for public servants is down to the mass tribunal claiming and sickness culture rife within it. Once again us on the right believe in fairness, genuine fairness, not the sort of world where people so easily exploit society. Seen it time and again, such as Ali Desighs multiple massive claims against The MET which funded his London property empire. Big fat lazy antagonistic negative bloke at kids football spent years constructing his dismissal, keeping meticulous notes, then just as we all predicted managed to win a tribunal and in his 40’s got a massive payout and income for life from his PS employer. Filth and yet so predictable.
    The public get worn down by all these spongers and thieves.

  2. Cole

    Talking of spongers and thieves, polls show the vast majority of us are opposed to privatising our NHS and flogging off public services – often to benefit Tory donors. No sensible economic justification is given for this racket which is, of course, the core mission of the Conservative government.

  3. Vice Squad

    Oh… so you have experienced a charlatan or two and we all must think like hardened Anti-Union Capitalists and exploiters of the vulnerable ?

    If you genuinely believed in fairness and decency you might consider the people who are in desperate need of support who are suffering because of the odd few…

  4. stevep

    If you know fraudulent activity is going on, it is your duty to report it to the authorities. Have you?

  5. Man the Barricades

    When you have a Chancellor who is a self-confessed tax avoider you are liable to discover many other quasi-legal personal money-making schemes. Why don’t you LFF run an article about Osborne’s agressive tax avoidance? On Radio 4 when he reduced the upper rate to 45% he was asked if he would personally benefit from the reduction. He answered “No, I don’t earn enough to be affected”. His salary is £135k and the threshold for 45% is £150k. He has benefits in kind which everyone else is taxed on amonst which are a free house at No 11 Downing St, with all utility bills and taxes paid, a car and a chauffeur with all fuel, taxes and insurances paid, the rent on his £4m house in Notting Hill he no longer needs as he lives at No 11, the income from a £10m trust fund and the income from a 25% share in the family firm Osborne & Little Ltd. No one in the press or media has ever sought to question him about these incomes. Why not? It’s time you at least ran the story and sought answers.

Comments are closed.