If the government promises a welfare payment to older people it should come from general taxation
In the budget today the chancellor will announce a deal between the BBC (desperate to survive) and the government (desperate to offload every service possible).
The result of this deal is another kick in the teeth for ‘Generation Y’ from a government which only ever sees young people as economy robots to pay for votes from older people.
In the deal, the BBC will no longer receive the difference from those over 75 who do not have to pay the licence fee – effectively a £600 million cut in BBC budget. Instead the BBC will have to swallow the cut in order to keep the licence fee. The sweetener is to ‘possibly’ have the law changed to allow a charge for use of the iPlayer.
So, let’s just get this straight: the government promises free stuff to those over 75. To pay for this they have told the BBC ‘they must pay for the difference’ costing £600 million, which will come from the BBC budget – otherwise known as my (and your) licence fee.
Because the government wants to give free stuff to old people, I will pay for their TV licences and reduce the amount of money that can go creative projects, quality news programming or coverage aimed at younger people (BBC3 will soon be taken off air).
I am not against the principle of those who receive a state pension getting free TV licences. Nor do I object to modernising the licence fee to cover iPlayer services. I do, however, object to the £145.50 a year I give the BBC being used to fund free licences promised by the government.
The licence is a flat rate fee. It does not take into account how much I earn, how many children I have, if I am in work, or if I am a pensioner who went to university for free, made money in the boom years and now own my own house.
Put simply, if the government promises a welfare payment to older people it should come from general taxation – where differences in income are taken into account.
This is nothing more than a 1/5th budget cut to the BBC which will threaten coverage, creative industries and the ongoing success of one of the only British institutions still respected worldwide.
I guess I shouldn’t be concerned. If the Conservatives have their way, when I am 75 I won’t pay a licence fee because there will be no BBC left.
Matt Aldridge works in Social Policy from central London. Follow him on Twitter
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
6 Responses to “Budget: Yet again younger generations are subsidising the old”
stevep
Income tax is the fairest and most effective form of taxation: The more you earn, the more you pay.
That`s why the right don`t like it. They want high earners to keep more of their income. They put up VAT instead, which is effectively taxation of lower earners, A subsidisation of the wealthy.
Who says the wealthy aren`t scroungers.
CGR
It must always be in people’s benefit to work rather than live off long-term welfare.
stevep
If there are enough living-wage jobs to go around, yes. If not, as is the case currently, then people need benefits to live in dignity and even survive in some cases. Assuming you want them to?
DaHitman
Lets not expect who demands money from the public, the BBC!
stevep
Scroungers like rich tax avoiders, large corporations, subsided agriculture and companies paying less than a living wage, you mean?