The press are not against monopolies, they're just looking to crush a weak rival
Another day, another avalanche of stories bashing the BBC in the Tory press.
They take their line from the dear leader, chancellor George Osborne, who yesterday told the BBC he’d like to trim the corporation’s website, and perhaps charge for use of the iPlayer catch-up service, accusing the BBC of ‘imperial ambitions’.
But just how ‘anti-imperialist’ are the Tory press when it comes to media ownership?
First, here are some of the headlines:
Osborne: BBC must curb online ambitions (Times)
‘Imperial’ BBC is threat to free press warns Osborne (Mail)
Oz hits BBC ’empire’ (Sun)
BBC must help shoulder cuts burden, says Osborne (Telegraph)
The editorial pages of the papers pick up this ’empire’ idea with zeal. The Mail’s leader column, titled ‘BBC imperialism‘, tells us:
“The BBC is supposed to be a public service broadcaster but is acting more like a rapacious commercial giant, trying to corner the market in news delivery.
Why on earth should the taxpayer have to fund this naked empire-building?”
As the Sun puts it:
“When George Osborne talks about its [the BBC’s] ‘imperial’ ambition, he’s spot on. Whether it’s the BBC’s local news sites putting local papers out of business, or its main website behaving as if it should be a monopoly provider of news, the BBC uses the cushion of the licence fee to protect itself from competition that exists in the real world – and to distort the market for everyone else.
It’s time there was a level playing field – and the BBC was brought back to reality.”
Since when, you might wonder, were Viscount Rothermere or Rupert Murdoch so concerned about monopolies?
– Rothermere owns the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, MailOnline (one of the most read websites in the world), and Metro.
– Murdoch owns the Sun, the Times, a chunk of Sky TV, 20th Century Fox, the New York Post, the Wall Street Journal, the Australian, and until 2011 the News of the World. Plus, as it happens, lots of local newspapers in Australia and the US.
These unlikely anti-imperialists and champions of the little guy are right to say the BBC is treated differently to other market competitors.
Murdoch and Rothermere would never have their papers attack a business rival in these tones – they don’t want the same abuse back, and anyway, such talk can be awkward during any future merger or buyout negotiations.
The BBC is treated by these publications as a vulnerable deer on the edge of the pack, a weak but real obstacle to their own mastery of the market. After all, you can’t buy a public service broadcaster.
The next best thing is to have your friends in government ‘cut it down to size’, (as another Sun editorial put it), that’s to say, small enough not to threaten their own ‘imperial ambitions’.
Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter
Read more:
Top 10 BBC bashing stories from the Tory press
Murdoch-owned Times attacks BBC for ‘media empire’ monopoly
Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
18 Responses to “‘Anti-imperialist’ attacks on BBC from the Tory press ring hollow”
Selohesra
I don’t think its their Jewishness that gets then the gig its their general liberal leftiness although I wasn’t aware half of that lot were Jewish.
Cole
It’s not 1933 you know.
blarg1987
Have you actually watched QT on the issue?
If you noticed it was very reasonable, with people saying we have to be objective our hearts saying one thing and mind saying another which is true.
The only way you will know if the audience is bias is to get a notepad and ask each member of the audience their political leanings.
stevep
It`s right-wing rants like this that give the game away. Criticise anything left of Attilla the Hen and hope something sticks. Or diverts attention from the real debate.
Try asking people in beleaguered regimes around the world how valuable and unbiased the BBC is and how important it is as an impartial source of information.
You might just get an answer unclouded by years of vile, far-right propaganda spewed forth by what passes for a “free” British press.
stevep
Far right tosh and humbug.