Richest are paying lower proportion of income tax than poorest, says ONS

Cuts to tax credits will make things even worse for the poorest households

 

New data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has confirmed that the richest people in the UK are contributing a lower share of income tax than the poorest.

In its latest statistical bulletin looking into the effects of taxes and benefits on household income (for the financial year ending 2014), the ONS finds that the richest and poorest fifth pay 34.8 per cent and 37.8 per cent of their gross income respectively.

The richest fifth of households paid £29,200 in taxes (direct and indirect) compared with £4,900 for the poorest fifth.

This is despite the fact that, before taxes and benefits, the richest fifth of households had an average income 15 times greater than that of the poorest fifth.

After taxes and benefits are taken into account, the ratio between top and bottom was reduced to four-to-one, leading the ONS to note the importance of benefits and tax credits in rebalancing the top and bottom sections:

“The overall impact of taxes and benefits are that they lead to income being shared more equally between households…

“The distribution of cash benefits between richer and poorer households has the effect of reducing inequality of income.

“After cash benefits were taken into account, the richest fifth had an average income that was roughly six and a half times the poorest fifth (gross incomes of £83,800 per year compared with £12,900, respectively).”

The Tories’ planned cuts to tax credits could make up as much as £5bn of the planned £12bn cut to welfare. As well as helping to reduce inequality, tax credits have been hailed as a driving force in reducing child poverty.

Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter

82 Responses to “Richest are paying lower proportion of income tax than poorest, says ONS”

  1. Matt Booth

    Sorry, I meant 15 times.

    “This is despite the fact that, before taxes and benefits, the richest fifth of households had an average income 15 times greater than that of the poorest fifth.”

    They should be taxed 15 times more than the lowest fifth.

  2. Fergus Mason

    The government should not be spending money on crap like reducing “inequality”. Benefits should be there to guarantee the minimum standard of living compatible with safety, but not necessarily comfort. If you want luxuries work for them. It is not the government’s role to take money away from the people it belongs to and give it to someone else.

  3. Fergus Mason

    There are other, and probably better, ways to pay for universal health care.

  4. Matt Booth

    Name one.

  5. Matt Booth

    Name one.

Comments are closed.