The Greens are right to focus on fuel poverty

We need to be reminded of the incentives to phase out fossil fuel

 

Launching the Green Party manifesto today, party leader Natalie Bennett called out the other parties for failing to mention the phrase ‘climate change’ at the leaders’ debates.

Unlike the NHS, the economy, or business, sustainability has not been prioritised, debated, or even used as a mouthpiece in Cameron and Miliband’s sniping.

Bennett is right to point out the problem. The state of the planet is the one truly universal issue in the election battleground and, in the future even more so than now, it will underpin the health of the NHS, UK business and the economy.

Bennett and Caroline Lucas are right to say that hesitation during the recession was not the right strategy; tackling climate change cannot wait for better times.

Yet the national mood is still wrong. Last week the discovery of up to 100 billion barrels of oil under an area of Surrey prompted delight from investors. Shares in UKOG, the main exploration company involved in the find, shot up by 300 per cent in early trading and closed at 164 per cent up for the day. Clearly, the economy of the energy market has not changed enough.

Last year the government’s Committee on Climate Change warned that the UK was on track to miss its future emissions targets. The statutory advisers on climate change found that the coalition’s Green Deal had not been a sufficient incentive for people to properly insulate their homes as a way of reducing energy use and expenditure; the number (p.32) of cavity wall insulations, for example, fell by two-thirds. The CCC were very clear: ‘current policies will not be sufficient’.

It’s been a difficult few weeks for the Greens, but they are right to decry the lack of emphasis on climate change in the other parties’ campaigns.

What the Greens understand, apparently better than anyone else, is that sustainability impacts everything, and they have done a good job in making it relevant by focusing on the issue of fuel poverty.

Fuel poverty is a national scandal – latest government estimates suggest that over two million households are classified as fuel poor. This means the UK has the highest level of fuel poverty in western Europe. In 2013 there were over 30,000 excess winter deaths, and the World Health Organisation said that around 30 – 50 per cent of these could be attributed to cold indoor temperatures. An average of 65 people a day died that winter because their homes were too cold.

This puts a massive burden on the NHS in winter months. The chief medical officer of the Marmot Review team has estimated that the annual cost to the NHS of treating winter-related disease caused by cold private housing is £859 million, and that every £1 invested in keeping homes warm could save the NHS 42 pence in health costs.

The energy companies known as the Big Six make huge profits which they fail to pass onto their customers. Last year the watchdog Ofgem estimated that profits would double in 2015. Meanwhile, the average household’s annual energy bill is now £260 higher compared to 2010 and we remain locked into the fossil fuel economy, pumping out expensive carbon into the atmosphere.

The Greens are pledging to end fuel poverty by:

Investing massively in renewable generation          

Reducing the amount of energy we need by improving energy efficiency

Reorganising the energy industry to break the dominance of the Big Six

Creating thousands of jobs, getting carbon emissions down

The party’s manifesto sets out plans to provide a free nationwide retrofit insulation programme, concentrated in areas where fuel poverty is most common. It is designed to insulate 9 million homes, and take 2 million out of fuel poverty. This programme, the Greens say, will cost about £45 billion over the course of the parliament and will create 100,000 jobs.

The cost of replacing Trident – which the Greens won’t do – is usually estimated to be around £100 bn.

In addition, the party wants to give tenants the right to require their landlords to make these improvements to homes, and want all houses to be built to Passivhaus standards.

Fuel poverty is something we can all relate to – no one likes opening bills. In making tackling it a key part of their manifesto, the Greens have provided people with a real incentive to ditch dirty fuel and look for cleaner, renewable alternatives.

The Labour manifesto fell short on environmental pledges. It mentions ‘droughts in California’ and ‘devastating typhoons in the Philippines’, yet however charitable we may wish our society was, these events are not an immediate incentive to the average UK worker. Meanwhile the Conservatives want to stop building wind farms and have pledged huge tax breaks to oil exploration.

Climate change is not an abstraction, and it needs to be dealt with which much more urgency than we are currently seeing. And when we switch to cleaner energy there will be other benefits, including economic and health ones, which will protect our society as well as the environment. On this point at least, I hope people will listen to the Greens.

Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

61 Responses to “The Greens are right to focus on fuel poverty”

  1. Gerschwin

    Fuel poverty is caused by green levies imposed by the idiot Labour government. It is they who put these people into fuel poverty and they who presided over their suffering. If 30,000 are shivering to death in their homes then you need to scrap all green levies and get drilling under Surrey sharpish – but you won’t because ‘global warming’ is a business these days and you’d rather let the elderly freeze before giving that up… but hey you keep lecturing about the nasty Tory party – we all know which the truly cynical and evil political party is.

  2. Gary Scott

    Renewable energy is renewable (obviously) free (once you build the wind farm/hydro/tidal electrics) and reliable (the tide in particular). No pollution and the possibility of using electric vehicles at lower cost and lower cost to the environment. Its a win-win-win.

    These aren’t ‘fringe’ issues anymore. Constant campaigning by Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and the Green Party have seen the profile of the environment raised and eventually gaining some acceptance (even by the Tories, grudgingly)

    Policies on housing regulations and insulating older properties via grants can cut usage by vastly reducing waste heat and have already been successful in Scotland. During the time of SNP minority government the Green Party worked with them and had a number of these policies introduced. So, they’ve already been road tested for a number of years.

    Given their pledge not to work with the Tories and the pledges of Plaid and SNP to support Labour it looks certain to be Ed Milliband in Downing St after the election. If the Tories want to form a coalition they’ll struggle. The LibDems are going to suffer and that leaves only UKIP and DUP. Taken together, these three could only have 20 seats between them. Given the current polling the Tories would have to have a last minute tidal wave of support to have any chance of forming a government.

    So, hopefully we can throw out the Tories and, although it may still be a coalition, the parties involved are a lot closer together than the current coalition. Being optimistic, this could be very good for the country.

  3. steroflex

    And if you frack, little green goblins appear out of the sky and the earth cracks open revealing the Great Satan with his bloody jaws.
    Who are you trying to kid?
    If you close all the coal power stations, if you forbid us to use oil to make petrol for our cars, buses and tractors and every other piece of machinery, for all our factories and all our electricity, then – Bingo! – the price soars.
    We all know do we not that Patchy and his little crew, Mr Gore and his film and the UEA all told a few fibbies. Why? And then there is the worship of the Sacred Hockey Stick.
    Now we find we are sitting on a Texas oilfield!
    But if we exploit it, the moon (which is made of cheese) will quickly melt and the sun will explode and we are all DOOMED.
    PS Fracking sites are ugly and an eyesore: windfarms and solar fields are beautiful. Everyone with any sensitivity knows this.

  4. ForeignRedTory

    ‘Trident, which the Greens want to get rid of, costs £100 billion a year.’

    https://fullfact.org/factchecks/cost_trident_nuclear_deterrent-28864

    According to a series of statements made in Parliament by ministers of the MoD in 2008 and 2012 the annual operating costs of the Trident programme amount to around 5 to 6 per cent of the defence budget. That’s the equivalent of between £2 to £2.4 billion.

    The Greens are right on Greenhouse Gasses, but wrong just about everywhere else.

  5. AC

    Trident does cost about £2.4 billion per year. £100 billion is the total lifetime replacement and operating cost of Trident in the next 30 years until the replacement reaches the end of its lifetime, according to the CND. It isn’t the cost of replacing Trident by itself.

Comments are closed.