The differences between Labour and the SNP are smaller than you think

In seeking to put as much distance between it and the SNP as possible, Labour is alienating potential voters in Scotland


Writing for the Scotsman over the weekend, Jon Curtice of Strathclyde University had a dire warning for Labour: “Rather than beginning to puncture the nationalist balloon, Scottish Labour is if anything falling even further behind the nationalists in the polls.”

Labour’s problem is that they are playing to the Tory tune. In seeking to put as much distance between it and the SNP as possible, the party is effectively alienating pro-independence supporters who previously voted Labour. In the process they are choking off the only viable option to a stable Labour-led government that can go on for a full Parliament.

Politics has changed – and potentially for good. The UK is fractured; but rather than embracing Scottish voters and seeking to tie the SNP to the difficult decisions to come, Labour, the Conservatives and the Lib Dems are slowly prising the Scottish-England border apart.

All of that aside, what of the content of the SNP’s manifesto, which Nicola Sturgeon today declared to be ‘bursting with ideas and ambition’?

At its heart is a commitment to bring an end to austerity. What it dubs a ‘modest’ spending increase of 0.5 per cent a year would, the manifesto argues, enable at least £140 billion extra investment in the economy and in public services. On the basis of an analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, Labour could potential sign up to such a plan and still meet its fiscal targets.

On housing, the SNP commit to the construction of 100,000 new affordable homes a year each year and to increasing the minimum wage to £8.70 an hour by 2020 (Labour  has committed to increasing it to ‘more than £8 an hour by October 2019’).

Restoration of the 50p top income tax rate mirrors the commitment made by Labour. It would also be difficult to find a Labour politician willing to argue against an increase in the Employment Allowance, or to support the £3 billion cut in disability support which, the SNP argues, ‘threatens to cut the income of a million disabled people by more than £1,000 a year’.

For the rest of the day, politicians of the major parties will be doing their utmost to undermine the SNP. In reality, however, the differences between the SNP’s plans and Labour’s are not as stark as some in Miliband’s circle might have you believe.

Ed Jacobs is a contributing editor to Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter

Like this article? Sign up to Left Foot Forward's weekday email for the latest progressive news and comment - and support campaigning journalism by making a donation today.

55 Responses to “The differences between Labour and the SNP are smaller than you think”


    Julia how can you have self determination in Europe or as the Nats used to say, “independence in Europe”. You cannot be in the EU and independent.

  2. Guest

    Keep making up your nonsense slogans.

  3. Robert

    When Miliband took over it was seen as to the left whether you think they were well that is your view, but they were seen as being to the left. Then slowly they have moved to the right and are now off into the center or center right due to Progress a party within a party.

    I would agree with Progress now the power house within labour it was always going to go to the right

  4. Leon Wolfeson

    To me, it doesn’t really matter WHY they’ve moved right, just that they’ve done so.

  5. AlanGiles

    Ms. Sturgeon just seems more forthright, articulate and genuine. Miliband seems like a posh boy posturing and attitudenizing. Perhaps his double act with Russell Brand will help him?

Leave a Reply