With a hung parliament looking likely, a new report brings together advice from experts on how to make power-sharing work for the public
With a hung parliament looking ever more likely, the Electoral Reform Society (ERS) have released a report that brings together senior politicians’ experience of power-sharing arrangements.
A recent survey by the ERS suggested that the public feel favourably towards power-sharing deals. In areas where there has traditionally been a fierce two -party battle, 54 per cent said they believe parliament works best when no party is too dominant so that cross-party agreement is needed to pass laws. 51 per cent said it is better to have several smaller parties than two big parties, and 50 per cent believe the era of two parties dominating British politics is over.
The report includes extracts from an interview with Jenny Willott, the Lib Dem MP for Cardiff Central. She describes the challenges that have faced the Lib Dems in the current coalition arrangement:
“Tuition fees are the prime example. I was critical of the plan to support the government on tuition fees but I lost the argument. Part of the problem was that we were inexperienced – the tuition fees saga happened very early on, within the first six months, when people were still finding their feet in coalition and still trying to get used to how it worked.
“There was still a genuine fear that the government might fall if the Lib Dems disagreed with the Tories too openly and too vocally.
“If it had happened a year later, perhaps it wouldn’t have happened the way it did; I’m sure there would have been more visible disagreement between the parties up front, and more of a compromise.
“I think it was a massive problem for the Lib Dems that the first visible disagreement was on such a key issue for the party. The timing was poor.”
So how do politicians form a successful coalition? ‘Working Together‘ offers five key lessons for party leaders in May:
1. For a coalition to work, there needs to be a common sense of purpose – clear aims and a united vision for what the parties want to achieve together
2. It takes time to negotiate. Deciding how to govern a country is not something that should be rushed. And sometimes, the longer it takes, the better the outcomes
3. need to sign off on any power-sharing arrangement if it is going to achieve legitimacy. This can take the form of special conferences or other means of gaining party members’ assent
4. Power-sharing comes in numerous forms. Each nation can develop models of coalition or minority government which fit with their own political culture
5. Coalitions aren’t easy. They need constant dialogue, good personal relationships between protagonists and mechanisms for resolving disputes if they are going to work
Andrew Burns, the Labour leader of Edinburgh City Council, Scotland’s only Labour/SNP coalition, also contributes to the report. He says:
“Now more than ever, I see genuine cooperation being at the forefront of innovative partnership working across sectors, tackling the serious challenges that lie ahead together, and rebuilding voters’ trust in local democracy.”
After May it is likely that this kind of innovation will be more necessary than ever, as the new government finds its feet in a changed political landscape.
Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
22 Responses to “How to form a successful coalition government”
Gary Scott
I hope that an agreement of this type goes ahead and pulls Labour back into being the people’s party.
Gary Scott
FPTP has already had problems, the seventies were a nightmare. From 1979 to 2010 things were clear cut. The difference this time is the emergence of new players threatening the big two. If this was in a business context it’d be TESCO Vs Saintsbury with Lidl and Also coming in and taking all their customers.
robertcp
I agree with this, although people keep on saying that the election systems in Scotland and Wales were designed to prevent majorities. They are semi-proportional and mean that majorities are possible, for example, the SNP got less than 50% of the vote in 2011.
robertcp
As I said, I have many disagreements with the coalition but the situation is not as bad as you describe. The deficit is lower than it was in 2010 for example.
uglyfatbloke
The Scottish system was not chosen to prevent majorities – it was chosen to prevent the gnats becoming the largest party; McConnell and Wallace told us so at the time and since they chose it we should take them at their word. The assumption (which as not unreasonable at the time) was that Labour and the Lib-Dems would always have very strong regional strength in the central Belt and the North East which would give them almost all of the FPTP seats (mostly Labour) and that the smaller number of list seats would be split between the tories, the gnats, Labour, Lib-Dems, Greens and SSP.