The former chancellor warned that whilst the issue of Scottish MPs voting rights on English-only matters needed to be addressed, to link it with further powers to Holyrood risked putting the SNP back into the ascendency.
The former chancellor warned that whilst the issue of Scottish MPs voting rights on English-only matters needed to be addressed, to link it with further powers to Holyrood risked putting the SNP back into the ascendency
The leader of the Better Together campaign, Alistair Darling, warned David Cameron not to make any moves to dilute the voting power of Scottish MPs just moments after Scotland voted to stay in the Union.
According to the Guardian, during a phone call with the prime minister in the early hours of 19 September, the former chancellor warned that whilst the issue of Scottish MPs voting rights on English-only matters needed to be addressed, to link it with further powers to Holyrood risked putting the SNP back into the ascendency.
Just hours later however, Cameron used a statement outside Downing Street to call for a process to allow some sort of English Votes for English Laws (EVEL) to work in tandem with further powers for Scotland.
The statement led the SNP to cry foul that Westminster was back tracking on the famous vow provided to the people of Scotland by the main UK wide parties.
According to the Guardian, the prime minister’s announcement also led to what it describes as an ‘angry Gordon Brown’ to make a swift phone call to the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood, to warn of a heavy price being paid by the UK parties as a result of the PM’s political posturing.
The reports of the warnings come as William Hague yesterday presented a series of proposals to address the West Lothian question.
It came as new polling has revealed support for restricting the rights of Scottish MPs to vote on English only matters.
The data, collected by ComRes for ITV News, found that 53 per cent of voters in Britain support the idea of not allowing Scottish MPs in the UK Parliament in Westminster to vote on issues that do not impact on Scotland, with 23 per cent opposing the idea and 24 per cent who did not know.
Interestingly, of those surveyed in Scotland, more people support the idea of restricting the voting rights of Scottish MPs (43 per cent) than those who were opposed to it (40 per cent).
The poll found also that 44 per cent support the idea of giving more decision making powers on issues such as tax, education, policing to big cities and regions in England and Wales with 40 per cent agreeing with the need for a fully-fledged English Parliament.
The results are likely to increase the pressure still further on Labour to come up with a more eye catching policy. It will need to tread a fine balance between regaining the confidence and support of Scottish voters whilst also seeking to attract the middle England votes which will be vital if the party is to make it to Number 10.
Ed Jacobs is a contributing editor to Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
18 Responses to “Darling warned Cameron not to pursue EVEL following Scottish vote”
Guest
And now you try and move the goalposts.
Right.
Selohesra
Having reviewed them I believe my initial comment and response were entirely consistent – so can only assume your alcohol impaired judgment is making you see things that aren’t there again. Why not leave it a bit until you sober up before commenting again Leon.
th43
What do you mean “your”? Is justice for England’s voters just a Tory thing then?
swat
I simply refuse to dye my eyebrows or half my beard or half my head of grey hair.
And I wish others would do the same. EVEL will come whether the Tories and Labour like it or not. Because it is only fair in a Federal Britain. Labour will havre to accept that it won’t be able to rely on the Scots votes to save its skin, but will have to work that extra mile to persuade MPS of whatever persuasion that it is fit to govern.
David Lindsay
“English Votes for English Laws” would be a judgement call by the Speaker on each occasion. It would never happen in practice. Not once.
England is so dominant within the Union that anything applicable here, except perhaps some purely ecclesiastical legislation, could always be argued to have some kind of effect on one or more of the other parts.
The devolution of benefits would be the denial of equal citizenship within the United Kingdom, and that it had already happened in Northern Ireland would not make that any better or any less true.
However, if income tax is going to be devolved, then there is no remaining case, such as there ever was, for the Barnett Formula. Simply none.
The powers are coming back to the English cities and counties, and must come back to them all equally. As, strictly on the basis of need, must the money.