The word 'foreigner' has become so toxic that Britain is now prepared to let refugees drown.
The word ‘foreigner’ has become so toxic that Britain is now prepared to let refugees drown
Britain appears to be engaged in an immigration death spiral. For one politician’s ‘legitimate concerns’ another will raise you their ‘community tensions’. Britain is ‘swamped’ by immigrants and any sort of logic is the preserve of ‘liberal elites’ and can therefore go to the dogs.
So deep is the rot that even some on the left are now yearning for a politics steeped in populism and wild emotion, as was evident last week when Russell Brand was feted by people who should know better for saying that he “ain’t got no time for a bloody graph”.
Don’t like the gist of your opponent’s argument? Then dismiss them as part of the liberal elite/the establishment/the corporate lobby (delete as appropriate).
Nowhere is this form of anti-logic more aptly demonstrated than on immigration, where everyone from certain factions of the Labour Party to the loopiest fringe of UKIP are completely impervious to anything which fails to paint migrants as a bunch of good-for-nothing freeloaders.
Sticking to the facts would be just so ‘elitist’, after all.
And so this week we’ve reached the bottom. The word ‘foreigner’ has become so toxic that Britain, along with other European nations, is now prepared to let refugees drown.
According to a statement from Foreign Office minister Lady Anelay, the Government “do not support planned search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean”. Their reasoning is as follows: it believes there is “an unintended ‘pull factor’, encouraging more migrants to attempt the dangerous sea crossing and thereby leading to more tragic and unnecessary deaths”.
British policy toward asylum seekers is now set by the spluttering bore in the pub. Human catastrophes like the war in Syria and the Isis takeover of Iraq are just a sideshow; the real reason refugees want to come to Britain is the £50 a week they might claim in Jobseekers Allowance. Better that we don’t look like a ‘soft touch’ by saving them from drowning.
Outrage would likely have greeted this policy a few years ago. Yet because the drumbeat of anti-foreigner sentiment has been beaten for so long, all we can do is shrug. To do anything else would be to fail to understand the “genuine anger that’s out there about immigration”, or so the argument goes.
But British politicians (and the public that elects them) want to have it both ways. They wish to scapegoat immigrants and asylum seekers for electoral gain (and to distract from their own failures to regulate the banks), yet they also cling to the idea of Britain as a supposed ‘sanctuary’ for the needy and the dispossessed.
On Tuesday Czech authorities honoured Sir Nicholas Winton, sometimes endearingly known as the ‘British Schindler’. Sir Nicholas was 29 when he put his life in great danger to provide safe-passage to 669 children, most of them Jews, out of Nazi-controlled Czechoslovakia. Some of the people Sir Nicholas rescued looked on with tears in their eyes at this week’s ceremony. Hundreds of people owe their life to this man. Calling him a hero somehow doesn’t cut it.
Tuesday, then, should have been a great day to be British. Instead, on the same day the Czech authorities honoured our very own Schindler, the British Foreign Office decided that today’s victims of genocide were not worth a single search and rescue boat. From Tuesday, asylum seekers out at sea would, if it came to the pinch, be left to drown – lest they get the silly idea in their heads that Britain might be prepared to help them.
We may celebrate Sir Nicholas Winton, but it’s evident that we’ve completely forgotten what he stood for.
This is not to draw a false moral equivalence between Nazi Germany and the various conflicts currently burning parts of the globe. Rather it is to point out that principles must be more than abstractions if they are actually to mean something; they can’t simply be projected onto the past.
Sir Nicholas put his life on the line to rescue the asylum seekers of his generation. Today, while we puff ourselves up and pat ourselves on the back over our ‘British Schindler’, we’re not even willing to send a few boats out to sea to rescue them.
James Bloodworth is the editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twittter
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
18 Responses to “We celebrate our ‘British Schindler’ Sir Nicholas Winton, but we’ve forgotten what he stood for”
Peter Martin
By all means let’s be fair, rational and logical about any discussion on immigration.
But that has to apply to both sides too. Take a closer look at this sentence:
“Nowhere is this form of anti-logic more aptly demonstrated than on immigration, where everyone from certain factions of the Labour Party to the loopiest fringe of UKIP are completely impervious to anything which fails to paint migrants as a bunch of good-for-nothing freeloaders.”
Notice how quickly any sensible discussion on levels of immigration is quickly ruled out by accusation of loopiness and anti-migrant sentiments.
Just on a point of information Mr Bloodworth: it is quite possible to like and respect migrants, even to the extent of being perfectly happy to see a family member marry one, but at the same time be of the opinion that 560,000 new arrivals, per annum, is too high a number for a small country like the UK to reasonably sustain.
Joe Muggs
“Some of my best friends”…
Guest
Yes yes, we can’t reasonably sustain trade or let the 99% cross borders. And that’s YOUR starting position for debate, right. That you endorse the line that all immigrants are good-for-nothing freeholders, which is ironically accurate about many of the richest…
Guest
Keep blaming everyone else for your hate, making frantic excuses for it.
You would have seen the children die, of course. They were foreign.
Guest
Ah, so now you’re rambling off about paying more to your rich, as you claim you’re an immigrant, from an alien culture, here to smash the UK. Thanks for that, as you try and end trade and shut the borders on the 99%.
No, not 4 million of your rich.