Labour has put its fingers in its ears in the hope that not hearing the bad news would make it go away.
Labour has put its fingers in its ears in the hope that not hearing the bad news would make it go away
In the end, Johann Lamont’s resignation as leader of the Scottish Labour Party over the weekend was probably inevitable.
Increasingly poor polling results and a party looking divided meant that something had to change. Sadly though, Ms Lamont is being used as a scapegoat for a much bigger problem – namely Ed Miliband’s failure to connect with voters across the country.
Putting aside the deserved sense of grievance that the outgoing leader of the Scottish Labour Party has at the way Labour HQ in London stifled the Scottish party’s ability to do things its own way, the independence referendum highlighted the dire position Miliband personally is in north of the border.
For a leader of the Labour Party to be performing worse in the polls in Scotland than the Conservatives when voters are asked which leader they prefer is bad enough. Add that to the fact that just 1 per cent of Scots trust Ed Miliband most to deliver extra powers for Holyrood – again behind David Cameron – and the picture becomes bleaker still.
Whilst a new leader north of the border might help, Labour’s immediate priority will be the UK General Election, an election in which it will be Miliband, not the Scottish leader, who will be putting himself forward as a prime minister-in-waiting. It is for this reason that Labour officials would be making a catastrophic error in believing that a mere changing of the guard at Holyrood is enough.
So why does all this actually matter?
Because Labour’s crisis in Scotland now looks more likely than ever to deny it the keys to Downing Street, allow David Cameron to continue as prime minister and by default continue the sense of grievances across Scotland that it isn’t getting a government that it votes for.
With some predictions that the SNP could win up to 25 seats from Labour, Miliband would need to pick up an additional seat in the Midlands and the South for each one it loses in Scotland just to keep the number of MPs he has at the moment, let alone to win an outright majority.
One only has to look at the polling ahead of the Rochester and Strood by-election, a seat which Labour held between 1997 and 2010, to see how dire things are for the party in the South.
The reality is that Labour is in a crisis of its own making. Having taken Scotland for granted for far too long it is now being out-flanked by the SNP on the left, whilst in the South the voters have turned to the right and in northern England, UKIP’s appeal to ‘traditional’ working class voters is becoming a severe headache for Labour strategists.
This has been brewing for some time, but Labour has been caught with its fingers in its ears in the hope that not hearing the bad news would make it go away.
Johann Lamont might have resigned in Scotland, but in the long run it is Ed Miliband who is proving to be more of a problem, and with just months to go before the country goes to the polls, the prospects of any dramatic turnaround looks increasingly unlikely.
As the Christmas carol goes, Labour faces a bleak mid-winter.
Ed Jacobs is a contributing editor to Left Foot Forward
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
19 Responses to “Labour’s crisis in Scotland could deny it the keys to Downing Street”
treborc1
The Welsh parties in Wales has stated they will not accept welfare being devolved, same as the Tories.
Labour have stated they cannot take welfare benefits until the whole funding issues have been sorted out and even then they stated it’s highly unlikely this would be devolved at any time in the near future.
Leon Wolfeson
Not even on the radar compared to the voters they’ve bled by moving right, as far as I can see.
Guest
So see a Hamas-supporting site.
Way to undermine any argument!
uh-huh.
robertcp
Losing seats to the SNP might mean that Labour will not get a majority but it might not mean that there will not be a Labour-led government. SNP voters would be committing political suicide if they propped up a Tory government. Regarding working class UKIP voters, I suspect that they tend to be working class Tories rather than traditional Labour voters. No need to panic in other words.
Peter Arnott
Ever been to Scotland? They’d rather gnaw off their own legs.