Should Britain take part in military action against IS? Or are we best of out of it?
Should Britain take part in military action against IS? Or are we best of out of it?
Foreign secretary Philip Hammond is to meet foreign ministers in London today to discuss plans to deal with the so-called Islamic State (IS).
David Cameron has said the UK will ‘hunt down’ the killers of aid worker David Haines, who was murdered over the weekend by IS militants. But the prime minister has yet to spell out exactly what form that action will take.
So we want your view: should Britain take part in military action against IS? Or are we best of out of it? Cast your vote. Result will be published later this week.
Create your free online surveys with SurveyMonkey , the world’s leading questionnaire tool.
Left Foot Forward doesn't have the backing of big business or billionaires. We rely on the kind and generous support of ordinary people like you.
You can support hard-hitting journalism that holds the right to account, provides a forum for debate among progressives, and covers the stories the rest of the media ignore. Donate today.
17 Responses to “POLL: Should Britain take part in military action against IS?”
treborc1
That what Blair said when he went into Iraq, better we killed the children and the women and the baddies. Hang on Gaddafi wants to see me.
sarntcrip
UNDER PRESSURE CAMERON HAS COME OUT WITH THE WE WILL HUNT DOWN THE PERPETRATORS RHETORIC BEFORE IT RESULTED IN NO ACTION WHATEVER
HE IS CLEARLY JUST PLAYING TO THE GALLERY AS THE POPULARITY OF HIS GOVERNMENT IS PLUMMETING
AIRSTRIKES =COLLATERAL DAMAGE=INNOCENT VICTIMS,WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO KILL INNOCENTS SO HUMANITARIAN AID IS THE ONLY WAY TO GO
Jay
The whole question in biased – we should take part irrespective of usa
Leon Wolfeson
The Arabs are. They sent Islamists.
That’s why we’re in this mess in the first place.
Just Visiting
You don’t think the funding and support of Qatar and Saudi played no factor?
Or the Sunni-Shia tribalism of Iraq?